5/03/2004

 

Kerry Plans to Define Self, II


Last night I postedword that candidate JF Kerry planned to spend $25-million this month to define himself as a Vietnam vet, etc. Jaws of JawsBlog noted that this "like his primary ads in NH all over again." Maybe so, but Kerry let's out one heretofore unbeknownst to me fact about himself: JF Kerry is a Coloradoan. (Perhaps it's where he gets the gold rush when shopping for brides.)

Taegan Goddard posts a quote from CBS Marketwatch and links the commercials, which can be found: HERE.

But the Colorado Rocky Mountain high
I’ve seen it rainin’ fire in the sky
The shadow from the starlight is softer than a lullaby
Rocky Mountain high (high Colorado) Rocky Mountain high (high Colorado)


0 comments
 

Mitt Romney and Capital Punishment


Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, via a commission, has proposed a formula with which the Commonwealth could reinstate the death penalty.
One of the major recommendations is raising the bar for a death penalty sentence from the normal legal standard of guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt" to a finding of "no doubt about the defendant's guilt." The commission has also proposed that a defendant in a capital case be given the option of facing two separate juries -- one to try him and, if he is convicted, a second to sentence him.
DNA, forensics.

It is possible that Romney is angling for a Vice Presidential nod should Dick Cheney step aside. It seems improbable that Massachusetts (or New England in general) would vote Republican in a Presidential election, but it might force Kerry to dump a lot of money into the Bay State

Just a thought.

0 comments
 

About Ted Rall


Just a reminder: Ted Rall is in no way consequential. He is at best a mediocre intellect, and he has never been a serious individual.

I shall never mention his name again.

0 comments
 

Saleh is Out


All over the press on Saturday were reports that former Republican Guard General General Jasim Mohamed Saleh had taken over the new Fallujah Brigade of Iraqi soldiers securing that city. U.N. General Secretary [sic, mine] Kofi Annan told host Tim Russert on NBC's Meet the Press that he had selected Saleh to put an Iraqi face on the mission. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Richard Myers appeared on Fox News Sunday, Face the Nation, and This Week telling us that this was bad reporting, that Saleh had not been selected. He still had to be fully vetted.

Coaltion Provisional Authority spokesman Dan Senor told host Wolfgang Blitzer on CNN's Late Edition that Saleh was definitely in.

Now from Reuters comes word that Saleh is out.
Their initial choice, who outraged victims of the Baathist regime because of past service in Saddam's feared Republican Guard, said he was stepping aside, leaving command of the new Falluja Brigade to former intelligence officer Mohammed Latif.
So Myers was right.

0 comments
 

Vets Say Kerry is "Unfit"


From the Cybercast News Service (CNSNews.com):
Hundreds of former commanders and military colleagues of presumptive Democratic nominee John Kerry are set to declare in a signed letter that he is "unfit to be commander-in-chief." They will do so at a press conference in Washington on Tuesday.
Read the story HERE.

"Unfit" is a word I've used.

I was tipped to this story by an unlikely source. It could be refreshing in this season.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

My referrers reminded me of this, from an April 17 post:
A soldier can kill. A soldier can be killed. It is a special employment, and it must not be considered, for the purposes of winning a war, with the terms used for civilians in peacetime.

Mr. Kerry voted not to fund those troops, thus denying them the rights of soldiers.

He is unfit to be Commander in Chief.
And he is.

0 comments
 

Dodd to seek reelection


Connecticut Democrat Cristobal Dodd says he is going to run for another term. No surprises, but he was an ambulating contradiction when he announced this AM:
Dodd said when he ran for re-election six years ago the economy was strong, the United States had good relations with foreign countries and the country had made strides in health care and education.
Okay, the economy is strong, the U.S. has great relations with foreign countries, and we have better medical treatments and more home-schooled children than every before. Despite Dodd's partnership in obstruction.
Dodd said he was seeking a record fifth term to "protect against the radical and reckless path the Bush administration is putting this country on."
Dodd's assertion is that things were great, Bush came along and was "radical and reckless" while Dodd was a Senator, and now he wants to be re-elected to prevent what he has unable to prevent for three years.

It's amazing to watch these minds function.

0 comments
 

New Judson Cox Column


The latest column by Judson Cox, Yo Quiero GOP, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site:
Approximately 90% of black Americans vote only for Democrats. However, a few decades ago blacks were more likely to vote for the party of Abraham Lincoln than for the party essentially founded by the Ku Klux Klan. Democrats by day/Klansmen by night, like Robert Byrd, Bull Conner and George Wallace were racist segregationists who wielded dogs, fire hoses and clubs in the civil rights battles. [MORE]
He speaks for himself.

0 comments
 

Attacking the Catholic Church


We have established that to believing Catholics, abortion is not a political issue; the sanctity of human life is fundamental to their faith. In today's San Francisco Chronicle, Frances Kissling, president of Catholics for a Free Choice, rumbles with determination to confuse the religious and the political.
The few policy-makers who have been punished or attacked [by the church for their pro-abort beliefs] have not changed their views, and instead have been perceived as more sympathetic candidates, winning elections even when they were the underdogs.
The church is not trying to influence elections. The Eucharist is sacred to them, and some bishops do not what non-believers (in church doctrine) to participate. This is not political.
But something has changed in the Vatican and among conservative Catholics: No longer are they simply anti-abortion, they are now Bush Republicans. Like their earlier counterparts in the Moral Majority and the Christian Coalition, winning elections has become more important than practicing good theology. They know that the Catholic vote will play a critical swing role in the 2004 election, and they hope to deliver that vote to George W. Bush. A Catholic Democrat is a serious obstacle to that goal.
That is quite a charge! Francis Cardinal Arinze, the Vatican official from Nigeria who oversees the sacraments, recently said that pro-abort politicians should not request the Eucharist. He had compiled a report covering the Eucharist broadly, and people like Kissling are attempting to politicize church doctrine. Arinze is more concerned with the way in which the Mass is celebrated than with Bush/Cheney or the Democrat Party. He is a member of the Vatican's College of Cardinals, not one who dotes on the U.S. Electoral college.

0 comments
 

Warren Buffet and JF Kerry


Warren Buffet, a registered Democrat, is a high profile billionaire. Candidate JF Kerry, like last year's Arnold Schwarzenegger campaign, has signed him on as an "economic advisor." In reality, though, this is merely Buffet lending his name to the campaign, if that. The Financial Times reports today:
"I have only had one talk to John Kerry who called me three weeks ago and said would I work on an economic council with Roger Altman and Bob Rubin [Treasury secretaries in the Clinton administration] and some others and I said yes and that's about it," said Mr Buffett.

"I have not had any meetings yet but I expect I will receive calls asking me to endorse a policy of some sort or another."
And like most other Kerry "supporters," Buffet is forced to overlook the candidate and go the Anybody But Bush (ABB) route; to wit:
"I think the election will be a referendum on George Bush," said Mr Buffett at the close of his annual shareholder meeting in Omaha. "The Kerry campaign is quite unimportant compared to how people feel about Bush when they go into the voting booth."
From Bloomberg.com, we find Buffet's sole criticism of President Bush:
Buffett said he has become an economic adviser to Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry. He said President George W. Bush's tax cuts are ``tilted toward the rich.

``I've got way more money in my pocket because of the tax change and I don't think it's a good idea,'' he said.
Buffet thinks that because he has more money, no one else does. This is erroneous, of course, as the President's tax cuts have helped those who do not happen to own Coca-Cola stock valued at more than $10-billion. (Or ketchup stock, for that matter.)

0 comments
 

The Fight is Not Over?


Specter defeats Toomey. As had been long expected, those were the results of last Tuesday's Pennsylvania primary. That's that: GOP nominates Snarlin' Arlen, again.

Pennsylvania's James N. Clymer, head of the national Constitutional Party, says his group will field a candidate this November: "Arlen Specter does more damage to the conservative movement than [Democrat opponent] Joe Hoeffel."

I received an e-mail this morning from Charles Fournier, Ballot Access Chair and Eastern Vice-Chair of the Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania (LPP), with word that his party needs 25,000 signatures to put their candidate on the ballot this November: Jay Russell - pro-gun, pro-small government, and pro-life. As Fournier writes, Russell seems to be the "[L]ibertarian double of Pat Toomey."

Russell will not win, and that is my main concern about the Libertarian Party; that being said, I cannot support Specter. Russell sounds like someone I can support even as what will essentially be a protest vote. But there is something bigger for the conservative movement in this.

If Hoeffel wins, Pennsylvania will have a Democrat Senator, but the GOP will not lose its Senate majority. We're set to pick up seats this fall. If Hoeffel wins, Arlen Specter will not be chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, blocking the President's conservative judicial nominees at will.

A vote for Jay Russell is a vote for Arizona's Jon Kyl to be chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Unlike Specter, Senator Kyl is conservative and respectable.

Not all fights are over.

0 comments

5/02/2004

 

Kerry plans to define self


The Associated Press reports that JF Kerry will spend $25-million in may defining himself.
The new ad campaign featuring his biography and platform includes substantial ventures into two Republican-leaning states.

[ . . . ]
The sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the two new ads -- one that focuses on aspects of Kerry's life such as his Vietnam service and another that talks primarily about his top issues -- also will run on national cable networks.
Vietnam. Go figure.

0 comments
 

KOFI ANNAN MEETS THE PRESS



Here's this from this afternoon's Rightsided Newsletter regarding Kofi Annan on Meet the Press this morning. Note his estimation of the role of the United Nations in Iraq.

KOFI on MTP. Russert offered U.N. General Secretary [sic, mine] Kofi Annan the opportunity to ply his wares this morning, and Kofi did not disappoint. When asked of the June 30 turnover day for Iraq, Kofi said: "I think [the transfer of] sovereignty will be and should be complete but their [Iraqi's] powers will be limited." He explained that, according to the U.N. plan, the Iraqis still have to write a constitution before they can pass any permanent laws, and they will hold their first national elections of January 1, 2005.

Annan disclosed that he decided that the U.S. military should turn Fallujah over to the Iraqis, in the person of former Republican Guard General Jasim Mohamed Saleh, because "you have to win the hearts and minds of the people [of Fallujah]." He decided to "defuse the situation" in Iraq and to "work with the Iraqis." And he approved of Saleh, pointing out that not all members of the Iraqi army "committed atrocities." (I had a gentleman suggest on the weblog that the allies might have used the skills of German General Erwin Rommel should he have switched sides, as he was not one of Hitler's true believers, nor did he commit atrocities. It's the same dynamic.)

Annan claimed credit for himself and for the U.N. He could be blinded by delusional arrogance, or he could be selling that idea to the Moslem hardliners, the French, and their ilk in order to placate them.

Russert asked Kofi about Lakhdar Brahimi's reference to Israel as a "poison" in the region, and the U.N. boss replied that Brahimi is "a very serious man who has done a lot of work." His credibility is not damaged, Kofi insisted. He insisted that Brahimi was talking of the perception in the Islamic world that Israeli policy is "undermining the efforts" to find peace everywhere in the region. He told Russert that some Arab's have suggested that the U.N. "resolve the Israel-Palestinian issue first, then move on." He would like to see Israel and Palestine follow the U.N. "roadmap" to peace which calls for two states. (It's now his roadmap!

Annan declared that his son, who received Oil for Food payoffs, "had nothing to do with the Oil for Food program." Other principles in the scandal were clean because they "worked for the U.N. for several decades." Kofi pushed it all aside: "I'm not sure that this is important. In the end, what is important is that the investigation of Mr. Volker get to the bottom of this." [Former Fed Chairman Paul Volker heads the investigation for the U.N.]

Russert, on the attack with most guest, read in monotone the headline of an Op/Ed asking what Kofi knew and when did he know it, in regards to the Oil for Food corruption. He read from the piece itself as if he were doing so to get it over with, in order "to give you [Kofi] a chance to respond.'

Annan got a pass this morning.


0 comments
 

Who will be the Democratic nominee?


Who will the Democratic Party run against President Bush this Novembers? If the true believers speak for all, it is critical to them to rid the White House of President Bush. The party's Powers-That-Be must then be looking beyond JF Kerry. Kerry cannot win, and they have to know this.

Kerry's base, if you can call it truly his, is the Anybody But Bush crowd; it is fairly sizable, with some estimates putting it at 43-percent of Americans. Kerry cannot win with them alone, however; he needs to have some Kerry supporters. To have Kerry supporters, he needs to present something for them to support. But what?

Kerry purports to favor remaining in Iraq, but he favors relinquishing authority to international bodies. Kerry says that he favors tax cuts, but smaller ones and for fewer people. His bellowing about outsourcing has been turned on its side. His gripes about the price of oil have been marginalized. Less Bush that Bush.

He's running on his four valorous months in Vietnam, but that doesn't amount to a call for votes, especially when he threw/did not throw his/someone else's medals/ribbons over the fence/onto the stairs upon his return. Especially when he asserted, in the recently recalled distant past, that he and his Band of Brothers were constantly doing some pretty nasty stuff.

But there can be arguments about those things. What is clear is that Kerry is not clear. He is not anything. There is not reason for anyone to support him other than that he is not George W. Bush, and the Democrats need more than this in a candidate. Anyone else is not George W. Bush, but someone else might have something to recommend him or her.

Remember, the President's base is excited about George W. Bush; it is not merely a ragtag group joined as Anybody But Kerry. President Ronald Reagan had this following tenfold, and the senior President Bush borrowed from that for his first election.

Bill Clinton developed his following -- 43% -- in 1992, but the quixotic candidacy of H. Ross Perot ensured that this was enough. For his reelection bid in 1996, he had built his following to nearly half of all voters. (The nation, under Clinton, was split down the middle to that extent.)

Okay, let's look at what the Dems must do if they want to pull this off. First, Bob Shrum and Mary Beth Cahill, both Kennedy advisors, are running the Kerry campaign, in theme and day-to-day respectively. They have make Kerry into something he's not: a centrist. The problem is that while Shrum is good at what he does well; what he doesn't do well is painting liberals as centrists. Shrum knows only how to run progressive/populist candidates: Ed Muskie, George McGovern, Teddy Kennedy, Jimmy Carter, Dick Gephardt, Al Gore. (He had nothing to do with Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign.)

The Democratic Party PTB have to look through their bylaws and find a way to throw the convention open. If not just retaking the White House, but defeating President Bush in and of itself, is vital to them, they must find someone else. But whom?


Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-New York) - It would be a good story, but her personal negatives are far higher than President Bush's, and Democrats think she is a wonderful Senator. Period.

Senator John Edwards (D-North Carolina) -"Two Americas" would still work, despite the thriving economy. The line could be: "It's working only for half of us." Inexperience during wartime is a negative, but he could do what Bush did in 2000: select gravitas as his running mate. Bob Graham, notebooks and all, should suffice in that role, or Joe Biden, if they could get him.

Al Gore.- A Democrat friend with whom I had been talking about this threw his name into the mix if only because he was the candidate in 2000 and won the popular vote. But he was running against a tax-cutting governor of Texas, not the Commander in Chief. Plus, Gore's lost several of his marbles in the Democrats' interregnum.

Really, I can think of no one else who might appeal to voters outside the ABB group. If they do not come up with a willing candidate soon, they will lose the election. With Kerry, the ABB crowd will probably prevent a landslide, but the Democrats will lose.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This article was first posted on WatchBlog, Friday.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Addendum. Eric Lindholm at Viking Pundit posts some additional input on this matter.
0 comments
 

Thomas Hamill


He had been a hostage of some thuggee brigade in Iraq for two weeks, but Haliburton contractor Thomas Hamill crawled out a window, chased a military convoy, was rescued, and turned in the two clowns guarding him. He was in Iraq because he was doing what he had to do for his family.

If he looked like Rambo, if he were a mercenary… two examples of childish prose we've seen celebrating tragic happenstance of late from the cesspool of human intellect.

This is good news. It is good news out of Iraq.

Let's see what it does. For his part, Mr. Hamill gets to come home.

0 comments
 

A Conspiracy of "Embedded Operatives"


One William O'Rourke opines in today's Chicago Sun-Times that President Bush is a suitable Commander in Chief in only one war, a political one:
The only war that the Bush administration is fighting with great skill and imagination, aided by wisdom gleaned from past experience, is the war against John Kerry's Vietnam war (and anti-war) record. Bush has had practice: All his previous major national opponents (John McCain and Al Gore) have been Vietnam vets.
Bush has not maligned Kerry's war record, much less that of McCain or Gore, the latter two of whom were included only in an spasm-triggered apoplexy of non sequitur. But O'Rourke continues:
Unlike in Iraq, President Bush has the help of embedded operatives throughout the country, locals willing to be even more gung-ho in the viciousness of their attacks than Bush himself. His troops also include his closest White House confidants, including Vice President Dick Cheney and Bush's language-nanny Karen Hughes. They've been sent out to snap and snarl at Kerry.
These "locals" are what I thought of as the core of Hillary Clinton's old Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. These are citizens with bumper stickers, letters to the editor, calls to radio talk shows, etc. It is not a per se conspiracy, as there is no organization. They are not affiliates of anything formal, least of all the White House or the Bush/Cheney campaign.

O'Rourke quickly deteriorates into incoherence, as do the rest of that lot. That lot. I'd call them the Vast Left Wing Conspiracy to destroy Laura's husband, but I don't see ideology as their motivation. We’re dealing with something more base and thus more pathetic. Ideology is secondary to them, as it is with their candidate.

This would be nothing if there were no solution. Perhaps another electoral loss will take some of the edge off. The only things keeping them from marginilization right now is their favorable press and the Presidential election. If President Bush wins the election and continues to do his job well, we could turn the corner. And the page.
0 comments
 

Rieckhoff on This Week


Army National Guard 1st Lieutenant Paul Rieckhoff, a platoon leader in Iraq, delivered the Democrat's response to the President's Weekly Radio Address on Saturday, which was distributed by JF Kerry's presidential campaign.

In it, he lambasted the President for not supplying troops with adequate equipment, food, and water. He said that our troops demanded "a policy that brings in the rest of the world and relieves their burden." He further agued that he does not expect anyone to be perfect, but that he wants the Administration to admit its mistakes. This is all stuff we have been hearing from Kerry's campaign.

Lt. Reickoff was Steph's guest on ABC's This Week, where he said he would go back to Iraq if called. He is a soldier, he said, and his duty is to serve. This is something the Kerry campaign would definitely want him to emphasize.

He's a soldier involved in politics. He told Steph: "When you're sending our boys and girls over there, you're involving them in politics." He explained that his platoon was required to perform political tasks for which they weren't trained, such as fighting corruption and ensuring public safety. Which sounds like a job for Superman, to be honest. He thinks they should do soldier stuff.

He opposes sending troops into Fallujah and negotiating, he said, because that's not what soldiers do.

He's just the tip of the iceberg, he said. He's talked to several of his military friends who evidently want their own 15-minutes as JF Kerry prostitutes.

He inexplicably noted: "I'm trying to stay as non-partisan as possible." So how did he wind up doing the Democratic Response. He was put in contact with the Kerry campaign.

He said: "Right now, we need more troops, or we have to get out." He does not care if we have to raise taxes on the wealthy to hire more troops: "It's the lower socio-economic class that is bearing the brunt of the burden" of the war.

I prefer to think of our troops as brave and skilled men and women laying their lives possibly on the line for our country, and they are that. One such brave and skilled man acting as a shill for a political nominee cannot tarnish the broader picture, or even his own service, but it would be positive if he hadn't been used in this way. He could have written to the editor of his paper, of national papers, news magazines, etc. This soldier has involved himself directly in a national political campaign on behalf of one candidate, taking a position contrary to the interests of those serving now in Iraq. That is dishonorable.

0 comments
 

The Sunday RSN is LIVE


Today's Rightsided Newsletter, the review of the Sunday shows, has been sent to the sundry global Inboxes and is also now LIVE on the RSN web site: HERE.

The tripod page will give you an annoying "side pane," which is of no value whatsoever to our purposes, so close it.

This week, Russert talks to KOFI™, and General Myers asserts that the Iraqi Republican Guard general will not be the man running the Fallujah Brigade for the Iraqis, only to be seemingly contradicted by Wolfgang Blitzer and CPA spokesman Don Senor.

There's other good stuff in there, and I'll put some additional material in here, such as Steph's interview with the Democrat National Guardsman who delivered the Democrat response to the President's Weekly Radio Address.
0 comments
 

Heard on CNN's Late Edition


Host Blitzer said: "The war in Iraq. Does George Bush or John Kerry have it right? We'll talk to former Presidential candidate and possible vice presidential nominee John Edwards."

Gee.

Edwards might reply: "You know, Wolf, right now, there are essentially two Iraqs..."

0 comments
 

Saleh "will not be the head"


General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was all over the talk shows this morning. He said: "This has been reported very badly over the last several days."

Saleh, the former Saddam Republic Guard general named by the press as the new commander of the Iraqi forces in Fallujah. It's not him, according to Myers. In fact, Sanchez and the boyz in Baghdad are said to be looking at another general.

There are several names floating, Saleh's was one of them, but Myers doesn't think Saleh will be the final choice. They all must be vetted, he said.

0 comments
 

The Sunday Morning Talk Shows



KEY:
MTP: NBC’s Meet the Press with Tim Russert
FNS: FOX’s Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace
FTN: CBS’s Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer
TW: ABC’s This Week with former Clinton staffer George Stephanopoulos
LE: CNN’s Late Edition with Wolfgang Blitzer

And that's the KEY I use for my Sunday review and analysis of the Sunday Morning Talk Shows, mercifully inimitable, for the free Rightsided Newsletter. If you are interested, please visit our web site or send a blank e-mail to rsn-subscribe [AT] tripod.com.


On MTP, host Russert will walk to UN General Secretary [sic, mine] Kofi Annan, hopefully grilling the man as he would an American politician about OIL 4 FOOD. What did he know and when did he know it? How much money did he personally receive?

Russert also talks to Joe Wilson, who is beginning his book tour. His initial claim-to-fame -- talking about Yellow Cake -- have proven inconsequential, and he's surviving in the spotlight on his wife's real name, Valerie Plame.


On FNS, host Wallace will talk to Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell,,, and the one and only Bob Dole, who is evidently still alive. It's still strange to think of the former majority leader as a Senate husband.


On FTN, Schieffer's going military. He'll talk to the Top Gun, Representative Randy "Duke" Cunningham, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Richard Myers, and Senator Max Cleland, who will probably talk about patriotism. He's Kerry's point man on that.


On TW, Steph will talk to John McCain, Arlen Specter, and Howard Dean. "Hey Moe! Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk!"


On LE, Blitzer will talk to John Edwards then do a dual discussion with Nebraska's Chuck Hegel and Michigan's Carl Levin. I do not know what productive can come of that.


I've been doing this for five years. There has to be a better way.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Steven Taylor's Toast-O-Meter is back at his PoliBlog, and he promises a "tweaked format." Check it out here.
0 comments

5/01/2004

 

The Times digs Koppel


Of course, I did not protest Ted Koppel's recitation of the war dead. It rang, to me, gimmicky, and attempt to lure otherwise serious people into watching his infotainment program. To that extent, I thought it a cheap use of the names of those fallen.

My gripe was with McCain using his position as chairman of the Senate committee which oversees the FCC to threaten Sinclair Broadcast Group, the company that owns eight ABC affiliates and opted not to show Koppel's program.

The NYTimes' Allessandra Stanley wrote a bit of fawning prose about the Koppel program. And to her, it was a protest:
When "Nightline" could not obtain a portrait, the show ran a Department of Defense photograph of flag-covered coffins at Dover Air Force Base, one of many such images that were published over the objections of the Bush administration.
But again, she can write whatever she wants in her The TV Watch column. (This one is dated Sunday.)

But I have no patience for ditzy reporters who scribble on things about which they know nothing. It would have been easy to fact check this.

She writes of some conservatives who viewed Koppel's game as a protest.
Not all conservatives agreed. "Your decision to deny your viewers an opportunity to be reminded of war's terrible costs, in all their heartbreaking detail, is a gross disservice to the public, and to the men and women of the United States Armed Forces," Senator John McCain wrote in a letter to the chief executive of Sinclair that was published Friday. "It is, in short, sir, unpatriotic."
McCain is not a conservative.

0 comments
 

Saddam's boyz are back in town?


While Iraqi's cheered, according to Canada's CBC, the United States military turned over operations in Fallujah to Saddam's Major-General Jassim Mohammed Saleh. a commander of the erstwhile "elite" Republican Card under the now-imprisoned former dictator.

Pierre Legrand at The Pink Flamingo Bar and Grill has several posts criticizing the move; to wit:
Too bad the Democrats suck so hard because if they didnt this would be the perfect opportunity to nail President Bush to the wall for going wobbly. We have the guys causing all the trouble bottled up in a city the marines are ready to take them down and we BACK DOWN! What sort of bloody bullshit is THAT???? This is pitiful and what we are seeing signals the deathknell of the US chances for victory. Whats next we replace Bremer with Saddam?
That may note be fair. US Marine Commander General James Conway acknowledges that Saleh and his officers have not yet been fully vetted.

Saddam's not coming back. Most people who served under Saddam were making a living, probably not engaged in torture and genocide. Saleh did not make the deck of cards, and it is likely that he was not on any pre- or post-war arrest lists.

I think this had to be done, to put an Iraqi face on the Fallujah security situation. It is the start of what could be a greater trend of allowing the Iraqis to secure themselves for the first time ever.

Let us hop Saleh is the right man for the job.

0 comments
 

Gen. Abizaid names names


Army General John Abizaid, head of the U.S. Central Command, urged other countries to step in with the policing of Iraq:
"I do favor the inclusion of more international troops, especially more Muslim troops," Abizaid told reporters via teleconference from his base in Doha, Qatar. "For example, Morocco, Pakistan, Tunisia -- they all have very capable and very professional forces that could be added to the stability equation once we move into this new level of political future that develops after negotiations in the U.N., or wherever they may take place."
Pak has said that they would send troops if the U.N. Security Council (UNSC) agreed to a resolution. (Pakistan is the president of the UNSC this month.)

Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero had vowed to remove his troops by June 30 if there were no UNSC resolution authorizing the use of troops, but he changed his mind and pulled them out beforehand. He did not wait for the UNSC to act, drawing a speech of stinging rebuke at the National Assembly from Mariano Rajoy, head of the opposition Popular Party on Tuesday. In the speech, which recorded by C-SPAN, Rajoy accused Zapatero of not playing well with others, dashing international coalitions, ignoring the United Nations, and harming Spain's reputation for trustworthiness. (Note that those are precisely the things which the opposition Democrats have said, erroneously, of President Bush.)

Fortunately, Abizaid did not use JF Kerry's tactic to entice other nations into helping secure Iraq. Several weeks ago, the Democrat candidate said that soldiers from other nations should be dying instead of U.S. soldiers. While none of us would disagree with that on principle, it is just plain stupid diplomacy.

0 comments
 

Late Derby Prediction



Read the Footnotes...

(...and wait for the news in the history books.)
0 comments
 

The PRC reports on prison atrocities


Xinhaunet.com, the web site of the PRC's news agency Xinhua, has finally reported on the treatment of Iraq prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad between last October and December. It seems they got ahold of an article in the May 10 New Yorker which printed what it found in an internal U.S. Army report.

It happens every day in the PRC's prisons and Laogai. The United States military is stopping it and punishing, not rewarding, its perpetrators.

0 comments
 

Assaulting Justice Souter


Last night at 9p, jogger/Justice David Souter was jogging near the Potomac River waterfront in southwest Washington when someone clocked him. He was treated and released in a DC hospital, and the motive is unknown.

So remember, don't take your Constitutional arguments concerning Roe v. Wade or campaign finance into your own hands…

0 comments
 

Touching the Screen


Touch the screen and vote. There is no paper trail thus no means to recount, and California Secretary of State Kevin Shelley -- a Democrat -- has banned it in four California counties, and is now calling for an investigation into Texas-based Diebold Election systems, which company makes the machines.

On any given time, at any given hour, I can walk into a Sheetz convenience store and order an M.T.O. To do this, I walk up to a screen and touch it for various options. I want a cold sandwhich , Italian hoagie ; check lettuce, pickles, cucumbers, green peppers ; provolone , No fries , no drink . I pay for it and one of the Sheetz staff makes the sandwich sets it on the counter. They're inexpensive and Made To Order (M.T.O.), utilizing touch screen technology.

I should have ordered tomatoes and voted for Dennis. Could I have written in dead fish for my hoagie? Not .

0 comments
 

Space Shuttles to Again Fly


NASA tells us that the Space Shuttles -- with their technology from the 1960s and '70s -- will be pasted back together in time to resume flights by Spring of 2005.

Privatize the space industry. No self-respecting company trying to earn a bottom line would tolerate this nonsense. The Board of Directors wouldn't allow it, and the CEO would hopefully be embarrassed to bother. The stockholders would have bailed ages ago, thus the incentive to put the best, safest program together. Competition would keep it cutting edge.

0 comments
 

Mission Accomplished


Good morning. One year ago today, the President landed aboard the U.S.S. Lincoln off the coast of California, gave a congratulatory speech to the soldiers who had just helped topple Saddam Hussein, and mentioned the work yet to be done. Since then, the media have gone to laughable lengths to portray that occasion, that speech, as a: "We're all done in Iraq, safe here" statement by a reckless President. For the longest time, they would not concede that the President did not say that the war was over; rather, he said that "major combat operations in Iraq have ended." That's because it looked as if major combat operations had ended, but the mission in Iraq had not yet been accomplished. So the press stressed the latter.

Troops are once again seeing what could be termed "Major Combat," especially in and around Fallujah and Najaf. The left has now rolled out the "major combat operations" line in his speech, hitherto untouched.

Let me be clear, when the President spoke, major combat operations had ended. The crew aboard the U.S.S. Lincoln, and all those who served in the initial phase of the war, had accomplished their mission of liberating Iraq.

The President has been faulted for not foreseeing or preparing for what has happened in Iraq since. Those faulting him do not understand sociology, psychology, politics, or -- most importantly -- war. There is no way to plan human history before it is ready for the history books. Or even the newspapers.

In his Foundation series, author Isaac Asimov developed a fanciful science which could predict sweeping events of human actions; he called it "Psychohistory." Even in the controlled and planned universe of Asimov's creation, psychohistory was not an exact science. Humans cannot accurately predict the actions of other humans; to one extent or the other, we are all complex, sophisticated individual entities who band in groups, our cohesion to the purposes of which vary.

Is this a case of the press believing that the powerful United States should be able to map the actions of the heathenish Iraqis? Or do they merely fault the Administration for not having planned for the various possibilities?

Preparing for situations does not necessarily prevent them. A suddenly freed people is going to revert to the principles they have know, not to those of the liberators, They adapt the Saddam culture to other circumstances, thus you have the barbarity of the murders of the contractors in Najaf. The mindset has to be changed, and that takes time, which varies from individual to individual, group to group.

This mission is being accomplished.

0 comments

4/30/2004

 

Koppel and the war dead


TacJammer tells Ted Koppel what he thinks -- "BITE ME" -- and lists the names Ted should have listed: those who were slaughtered on 9-11.

They have been listed on TV, at least in part, but that was done long after there were people still dying on September 11. Our troops are still in danger in Iraq.

0 comments
 

Sharpton invited to speak at the DNC


Courtesy of Erick Erickson at Confessions of a Political Junkie -- who has been dreaming that this would be so -- I've learned the great news that candidate JF Kerry has told BET News that the Reverend Al Sharpton is invited to speak at the Democratic National Convention in Boston this July. [BET press release]
On Rev. Al Sharpton as a Speaker at the DNC ...

Kerry: "I hope so. Sure ... That's my call ... If he wants to do it, he can do it ... Let me just say to you ... if he wants to do it, I'd like him to do it. I think he'd do a terrific job. I think he'll add something ... there's no plea necessary. It's my invitation."

On Rev. Sharpton's Impact on the Presidential Campaign Season ...

Kerry: " ... He certainly earned the right to be part of this process, and I think he can be very, very helpful in motivating people, in helping to register people."
And, by the way, Howard Dean fancies himself the next Oprah.
0 comments
 

New Column on the RSN site


The latest column by Jan Ireland, Score Pat Tillman American Hero, Rene Gonzalez Cowardly America Hater, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site:
Words so often reveal more than the writer intends, and truth can find its way out of the craftiest planted propaganda.

Puerto Rico and the University of Massachusetts were shamed yesterday when their lamentable son Rene Gonzalez sought to wound America as it grieves for football great turned elite Army Ranger Pat Tillman.

Racism and envy were part of the reason Gonzalez called Tillman a "pendejo" (idiot) and a "Rambo" soldier who deserved to die. But the biggest reason of all was the personal cowardice of America hater Rene Gonzalez. [MORE]

0 comments
 

Al Gore and the Young American


Al Gore and other investors purchased Newsworld International from Vivendi Universal, the struggling French media giant, and plans to turn it into a public affairs and entertainment outlet for the 18-34 demographic.

Al Gore says he's not targeting the nation's most popular cable news network, the FOX News Channel, despite rumors to the contrary.
"This is not going to be a liberal network, or a Democratic network in any way, shape, or form,'' the former vice president said.
Is there a wink we're missing?

There are a few that claim that while the FOX News Channel claims to be "fair and balanced," they wink when the say it. It's not true, the claim goes.

Gore no doubt buys into this sloppy line of thinking, so he might be thinking along the lines of: "Well, if Murdoch and Ailes can claim to be fair and balanced, so can the Al Gore News Network!" (NOTE: I invented the name for the new network; what he actually calls it is his business.)

After watching Gore on the stump for the past several years, I cannot imagine the man reserving his fiery vitriol from certain aspects of his life. Unless he is a brilliant actor and genius compartimentalizer, which would make his political life an ingenious fraud.

0 comments
 

John McCain and Ted Koppel


Ted Koppel has decided to use his ABC new infotainment show Nightline to recite the names of the 532+ K.I.A. in the Iraq war and reconstruction effort. Sinclair broadcasting, which eight ABC stations, is not going to air it. From the Sinclair web site:
The ABC Television Network announced on Tuesday that the Friday, April 30 edition of "Nightline" will consist entirely of Ted Koppel reading aloud the names of U.S. servicemen and women killed in action in Iraq. Despite the denials by a spokeswoman for the show, the action appears to be motivated by a political agenda designed to undermine the efforts of the United States in Iraq. [emphasis in orig]

[ . . . [
We understand that our decision in this matter may be questioned by some. Before you judge our decision, however, we would ask that you first question Mr. Koppel as to why he chose to read the names of 523 troops killed in combat in Iraq, rather than the names of the thousands of private citizens killed in terrorist attacks since and including the events of September 11, 2001. In his answer, we believe you will find the real motivation behind his action scheduled for this Friday. Unfortunately, we may never know for sure because Mr. Koppel has refused repeated requests from Sinclair's News Central news organization to comment on this Friday's program.
Fair enough. Senator John McCain (R-Arizona) -- who chairs the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, which oversees the FCC, which controls Sinclair's ability to broadcast -- sent a letter to Sinclair Chairman and CEO David Smith, saying, in part:
There is no valid reason for Sinclair to shirk its responsibility in what I assume is a very misguided attempt to prevent your viewers from completely appreciating the extraordinary sacrifices made on their behalf by Americans serving in Iraq. War is an awful, but sometimes necessary business. Your decision to deny your viewers an opportunity to be reminded of war’s terrible costs, in all their heartbreaking detail, is a gross disservice to the public, and to the men and women of the United States Armed Forces. It is, in short, sir, unpatriotic. I hope it meets with the public opprobrium it most certainly deserves.
Smith replied, in part:
It is "Nightline's" failure to present the entire story, however, to which Sinclair objects. "Nightline" is not reporting news; it is doing nothing more than making a political statement. In simply reading the names of our fallen heroes, this program has adopted a strategy employed by numerous anti-war demonstrators who wish to focus attention solely on the cost of war. In fact, lest there be any doubt about "Nightline's" motivation, both Mr. Koppel and "Nightline's" executive producer have acknowledged that tonight's episode was influenced by the Life Magazine article listing the names of dead soldiers in Vietnam, which article was widely credited with furthering the opposition to the Vietnam war and with creating a backlash of public opinion against the members of the U.S. military who had proudly served in that conflict

In closing, I would like to quote for you the words of Captain Kate Blaise of the U.S. Military. Captain Blaise served in Iraq as a member of the 101st Airborne Division and suffered the loss of her husband Mike who was killed while also serving in Iraq. In commenting on exactly the type of practice which "Nightline" intends to employ, Captain Blaise had this to say:

"I was watching the news, watching this anti-war demonstration and they were reading off names of soldiers who had fallen in Iraq and they read off my husband's name. That made me very angry because he very strongly believed in what he was doing and they were using his name for a purpose that he would not have approved of."
I've heard the theory that McCain enjoys tweaking the President, a notion which he dismisses, and this seems to be evidence of that. Sinclair owns no stations in Arizona, so McCain should not have interfered in a business decision by Sinclair Broadcasting. That a chairman of the committee overseeing the FCC would so such a thing is disgusting and reprehensible. The government is neither empowered nor does it belong anywhere near such things. The rest of this matter is trivial.

Like Koppel's motivation. He might be protesting the war by taking the ridiculous step of listing the dead before the action is finished. He might also be trying to gather attention for his infotainment show. (I haven't seen his ratings.) Either way, he is dishonoring the dead. His show began as a nice little thing with news of our hostages in Iran in 1980. I do not know why he is still on the air.

Sinclair is a private company.

People, including Koppel, have a right to protest the war, even to dishonor the dead. I have a right to note what they are doing. Sinclair has a right not to air his stunt. John McCain has no right or power to use his elected position to bully a private corporation.
0 comments
 

The French: "Canadians Hate Bush"


This stuff from the French wire AFP is always stimulating.

A new Ipsos-Reid survey conducted for the CTV , the remnants of the government-owned Canadian television system, and the Toronto Globe and Mail newspaper had concluded that 83-percent of Canadians responded in agreement to a statement that President Bush "is not necessarily a friend of Canada and doesn't really know anything when it comes to Canadian issues." The French translated the Canadian reaction to that statement as: "[m]ore than eight in 10 Canadians harbour [sic] a strong dislike for President George W. Bush." It cannot be thusly translated, but the French are getting sloppy with the strong dislike they harbor.

Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin is meeting with President Bush as I type, trying to undo the damage do to the U.S.-Canada relationship by former Canadian PM Jean Chretient. To be certain, Martin opposed the war; the difference is that he does not fear or hate the United States.

And that's my honest analysis.

0 comments
 

Joe Wilson's Book


Ambassador Joe Wilson's novel, The Politics of Truth: A Diplomat's memoir, was due out today. The NYTimes the damned thing today. You can read that by clicking on the cover, here:



He promised that he would disclose the name of the person in the White House who leaked his CIA operative wife's name, Valerie Plame, to columnist Robert Novak and according to the AP, he names three of them: Cheney Chief of Staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby, the NSC's Elliott Abrams, and Karl Rove:
"The workup on me that turned up the information on Valerie was shared with Karl Rove, who then circulated it in administration and neoconservative circles," Wilson writes.
White House Press Secretary Scott McLellan had previously ruled all three men out as possible sources.

Wilson's motivation? Book sales, of course, but he wants to "frog-march" the Bush Administration out of the White House. He runs with Rand Beers and Dick Clarke, and has spoken at MoveOn.org events. He's one of the mini-assassins of the organized ABB crowd.

We'll find out soon enough if it contains anything new or interesting.

0 comments
 

Those Pictures of prisoner humilation


On Wednesday night, CBSNews.com, on one of the infotainment shows (60 Minutes II, aired photographs of Iraq prisoners being put in goofy poses by their US military guards at the Abu Ghraib prison. As a CBSNews.com story relates, former CIA Bureau Chief Bob Baer told Dan Rather
"I visited Abu Ghraib a couple of days after it was liberated. It was the most awful sight I've ever seen. I said, ‘If there's ever a reason to get rid of Saddam Hussein, it's because of Abu Ghraib,'” says Baer. “There were bodies that were eaten by dogs, torture. You know, electrodes coming out of the walls. It was an awful place."
Now prisoners are made to assume goofy and humiliating poses.

At the White House, from Reuters:
"We cannot tolerate it and the military is taking strong action against the individuals responsible for these despicable acts," White House spokesman Scott McClellan said.
According to the Associated Press, Army Reserve Staff Sergeant Chip Frederick, one of those implicated in the humiliation, told his family in an e-mail that "[w]e've had a very high rate with our styles of getting them to break; they usually end up breaking within hours." Barely authorized psychological warfare?

Britain's lefty broadsheet Guardian Unlimited Friday complains about the lack of coverage this has received but argued that the photographs "could prove a tipping point in the war in Iraq."

Just like the Sixteen Words, Dick Clarke's book tour testimony, and Valerie Plame-gate could destroy the President. Yeah.

We have some overly enthusiastic soldiers who conducted themselves in a way contrary to the code observed by U.S. servicemen. Punish them and avoid hyperbole. It may be reprehensible, but it is most certainly not barbaric.

0 comments
 

New column on RSN site


The latest column by Dennis Campbell, Candidate Reaffirms his Support of Slavery, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter site:
WASHINGTON - We caught up with Sen. John Kerry as he prepared to debate fellow Democrat Stephen Douglas for the right to challenge likely Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln in the 1860 presidential election.

We wanted to clarify Sen. Kerry's position on slavery, the most divisive issue in American politics. Republicans will campaign on a strong anti-slavery platform, while Democrats are equally staunch in their support of the "peculiar institution."

Yesterday at a noontime rally, Sen. Kerry defended the rights of slaveholders in the face of
mounting criticism from Christian clergy, who call slavery immoral and an affront to Christianity. [MORE]
A little bar will open to the left of your screen when you visit the page with the column. Close it. It's harmless but useless, someone's "bright idea."

0 comments
 

Ronald Reagan U.


The school will be 200 miles northeast of Denver, but Nancy's nixed the name. It's not their name to use, and his name remains private for such purposes for as long as the President or Mrs. Reagan lives.

0 comments
 

Air Support


Good Morning! Last night, a good friend stationed with us USAF at the Ali Al Salam Air Base wrote me (on his distribution list) apologizing for a virus he might have inadvertently passed around:
"Go figure, we spend zillions of dollars and have Anti Virus software running all the time but this crap slips through.
I tried to be reassuring:
Think of it this way. For all the trouble which can be caused by computer viruses and Iraqi insurgents, they don't get air support. - Mark
It's true.
0 comments

4/29/2004

 

To win (reelection), the Prez has to lose (Iraq)


That's an interesting assertion made by Daniel W. Drezner, whom we might know from his exactly eponymous weblog, in Thursday's TNR.com.

The operative graph [link]:
Ordinarily, presidents are rewarded for doing their jobs well. In Bush's case, however, quiet in Iraq would allow Americans to focus on their pocketbooks. While the economy--and Bush's approval numbers on the issue--have rebounded from lows, the president remains far weaker on domestic issues than on international affairs. Democrats can still claim that Bush is the first president since Herbert Hoover to preside over a decline in the number of jobs. The latest Gallup poll shows a 54 percent disapproval rating on Bush's handling of the economy. Bush's best hope for reelection is for the electorate to focus on his leadership abilities--and one way for that to happen is for there to be trouble in Iraq.
I'm afraid not, though it does make sense. If he is going by the worn tradition that Republicans poll worse than Dems on the economy, that is a part of the conventional wisdom which he earlier suggests might not be operative this cycle.

If the economy continues to rally, his concomitant numbers will rise. As far as the Dems pointing to the total job loss for the entire administration -- "Herbert Hoover, maaaan" -- that argument is already flat on its face. Kerry harps, Pelosi spits, but with an job creation like the nation is currently experiences, and 9-11 and the bursting of Clinton's bubble on which to blame the previous losses, the President will be fine.

The argument that the President needs things to go poorly in Iraq so that he can demonstrate his leadership ability is also, I think, faulty. Remember, if things do go poorly in Iraq, candidate JF Kerry and his allies can more forcefully use the dread Q-Word: QUAGMIRE. They can sing the Vietnam song, and few voters are going to wait for the nuance.

If the President can successfully give Iraq to the Iraqis and the economy says strong, he has the election in the bag. (He may anyway, should the Democrats go through with nominating JF Kerry.) The President can then score his leadership points through the war on terror and maybe -- this one is sweet, in a perverse way -- forming some global alliances to wave in JF Kerry's face.

Life ain't so bad. We don't have to lose an arm to win.

0 comments
 

New Column on RSN site


The latest column by Justin Darr, Liberals are Unpatriotic, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site:
There they go again. Another Liberal has decided that loud must somehow equal right. This time Hillary Clinton has decided to join the ranks of Al Gore and Howard Dean by screaming herself into a hysterical frenzy at a pro-abortion rally. Other than making America finally understand why Bill looked outside his marriage for companionship, Hillary's tirade about how she is tired of Republicans calling Liberals "unpatriotic" makes no sense. No Republican has called the Democrats unpatriotic. They have questioned the Liberals dedication to national defense, their commitment to the War on Terror, and the motivations for their Socialist policies, but not their patriotism. Liberals may want to blame the Republicans for their public perception of Anti-Americanism, but the Democrats actually are having a problem with common sense. [MORE]


0 comments
 

The Testimony of the President


To be fair, the 9-11 Commission appeared behind the President and Vice President this morning, rather than them appearing before the commission. In the Oval Office, with all that the power the room implies, the commissioners had a "conversation" with the President.

From his remarks afterward:
I want to thank the Chairman and Vice-Chairman for bringing the commission here and giving us a chance to share views on different subjects. And they had a lot of good questions. I'm glad I did it. I'm glad I took the time. This is an important commission, and it's important that they ask the questions they ask so that they can help make recommendations necessary to better protect our homeland. It was -- I enjoyed it.
Do not forget that just a month ago, the press had the Dick Clarke book tour appearance crushing is chances at reelection. That did not work out, so they determined that Condoleezza Rice's testimony would make or break his reelection chances.

Evidently the President answered most of the questions and did so authoritatively. The perception pretty much all around is that it went well, as the opposition has resorted to its fall-back position of continuing to question why the President and VP were questioned together. (I suspect that EJ Dionne will have some other sort of criticism and sniping. I have to credit him with a superior imagination.)

What I hope can happen now, and it can, is that the commission put this circus which began with the public hearings and the Dick Clarke book tour behind them. They took a lot of substantial testimony before that circus, and some afterwards. If they can concentrate on that and eliminate Jamie Gorelick's fingerprints as much as is possible, this could be productive.

0 comments
 

New Poll (Manet still has brush in hand)


From VOA:
The New York Times-CBS News poll found that 47 percent of those surveyed believe the United States did the right thing in invading Iraq, down from 58 percent in March and 63 percent in December.
The same poll has his general approval rating down and the one for his handling of the war in Iraq down as well.

Take the poll when we've finished.

No one took a survey of art lovers to rate Edouard Manet halfway through The Execution of Maxmillion. Wait 'til Saddam's work is undone.

0 comments
 

New Column on RSN site


The new column by Isaiah Z. Sterrett, No Doubt About It: Muslims Can Handle Freedom, is live on the RSN web site:
LAST WEEK I wrote a column in which I argued that liberals have started addressing conservatives as neoconservatives because the word conservativewithout the divisive prefix of neono longer frightens the American public. By labeling the Bush Administration neoconservative, rather than merely conservative, liberals are trying to undo all of the positive steps conservatives have taken to improve our image. [MORE]


0 comments
 

Patterns of Global Terrorism Report


In their annual report, the State Department reported that the last year in which there were fewer terrorists incidents than in 2003 was 1969, some twenty years before the fall of the Soviet Union facilitated the rise of modern terrorism.
[Top State Department counterterrorism official, Cofer] Black also said al-Qaida "is no longer the organization it once was. ... Most of the group's senior leadership is dead or in custody, its membership on the run and its capabilities sharply degraded." He said more 3,400 al-Qaida suspects have been detained worldwide.
The war on global terrorism is being won, and brought together by President Bush using the good will after September 11, the world is winning it.

0 comments
 

Testifying in Private


The French wire AFP reports today:
The president, who initially fiercely opposed the commission's creation, grudgingly agreed to the session on condition he not be sworn to tell the truth, that Cheney accompany him, and that there be no transcript or recording.
That's the French, who report:
But a poll published Thursday showed Bush's approval ratings in a slump, his race with Kerry a dead heat, and highlighted growing doubts about his handling of the war in Iraq.

And former counter-terrorism aides have publicly called into question Bush's response to the growing threat from Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network after he took office in January 2001.
That's French analysis, and it's so misguided that it is almost stunning. But it's what the French people are led to believe, and the mullahs are saying similar things to their charges in the mideast.

Back to the testimony. Fred Barnes stated earlier this week that the President should not testify at all, that the panel was too discredited. I think the President's testimony will give the panel some of the credibility it has lost since it kicked of the Dick Clarke Book Tour last month. The circus we saw was only a small portion of the work they did, so if they could put that aside and excise, to the extent possible, Jamie Gorelick's participation from the final report, they could offer something potentially valuable.

One should not throw the baby out with the bathwater, even if such bathwater is particularly putrid. I hope the President and Mr. Cheney can allow them to get serious again.

0 comments
 

Election Law Broken in South Dakota Senate Race


Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-South Dakota) ran a phone ad campaigning pointing fingers and blaming Republican challenger John Thune for starting the negative campaigning.

Daschle did not include a message stating that he approved of the message, as required by federal election law to distinguish for the public between soft and hard money advertising.

Democrats said oops, while Republican called it blatant hypocrisy with Daschle's initial pledge to run a positive campaign:
"Their hypocrisy is unbelievable," said Thune's campaign manager, Dick Wadhams. "It's either blatant disregard for the law or incompetence."
How stupid is Daschle's campaign? Every official political ad, seemingly but Daschle's, has contained the disclaimer.

The ads were pulled.

0 comments
 

The state of the nation is…


John Kerry just finished spreading his message of malaise to enraptured audiences in West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan, talking not of the current job situation, but of the jobs lost since the burst of the Clinton bubble, especially those in manufacturing.

President Bush heads to Michigan and Ohio next week to talk about the current condition of the economy.

The Democrat is appealing to defeat, while the Republican is reflecting victory.

Meanwhile, the economy grew 4.2% between January and March, as businesses invested money in their infrastructures. Growth was 4.1% in the fourth quarter of 2003, and this is the first time we have had three straight quarters with 4%+ growth in a decade.

But Kerry reports that we are miserable, and he has an half-baked index to "prove" it.

0 comments
 

Gore gives $4m to the DNC


Like most Democrats, Al Gore is not excited about his party's presidential candidate, JF Kerry.
"I didn't support John Kerry. President Carter didn't support John Kerry. President Clinton didn't support John Kerry," Gore said. "John Kerry earned the nomination of this party. He won it the hard way."
He claims to have $6.5-million left from his failed 2000 Presidential run. Of that money, he's giving $1-million each to the DCCC and the DSCC, the party committees which work on winning House and Senate seats respectively.

He's giving $4-million, he says, to the Democratic National Committee in order to help Kerry's Presidential effort, simply because the candidate is not President Bush. DNC spending this year is restricted by the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law, so it will not help Kerry as much as the numbers claim.

No word as to whether he gave the maximum $2,000 to Kerry's campaign machine. He could also have paid his subordinates, if such he has, to donate $2,000, thus skirting the law and increasing the assistance to Kerry.

0 comments

4/28/2004

 

Infiltration


Super-secret Dem bratty protestors are seeking to infiltrate the ranks of volunteers for this Summer's Republican National Convention in NYC.
"I think they don't understand either just how much of New York City is not prepared to welcome them," said Amanda Hickman, who described herself as a community gardener from Brooklyn. "I don't think that has clicked."
Some aging kid, age 37, has a web site designed to get troublemakers to infiltrate both the RNC and the Democratic National Convention in Boston. The Boston boys are seen as virtually immune, as they already have their volunteers.

0 comments
 

PA Redistricting Plan Stands


We ALMOST got the courts out of the legislative function of redistricting.

After the 2000 census, the Pennsylvania legislature redrew the maps of Congressional districts to reflect the loss of two seats. The Republicans controlled both chambers of the legislature, so the maps were redrawn to reflect the will of the people through their representatives.

That's my Republican way of saying that they redrew the districts to favor the GOP. The Democrats complained that Pennsylvania voter registration is about evenly split between the two parties so the redistricting should have reflected that.

The Supreme court decided 5-4 in the case of Vieth v. Jubelirer that Commonwealth Senate Pro Tem Bob Jubelirer get his way and the plan stands.

Justice Antonin Scalia -- writing for Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Clarence Thomas -- upheld the Pennsylvania redistricting map and wanted to overturn the Court's 1986 redistricting case of Davis v. Bandemer, 478 US 109 (1986), which allowed the courts to meddle in legislative redistricting. (Rehnquist and O'Conner had dissented in that case.)

The view had only four votes, but Justice Anthony Kennedy sided with them to allow the Pennsylvania redistricting to stand but to keep Davis v. Bendemer.

The ACLU, arguing against the plan, maintained that the Constitution does not allow for such plans which might let a minority of voters to control a majority of Congressional seats. The plan, of course, does not such thing, and the Constitution makes no mention of political parties.

Last week, the SC declined to hear an appeal of Texas' redistricting plan.

0 comments
 

McDermott's Pledge


Representative Jim McDermott (R-Washington) was seventeen when President Eisenhower signed the bill into law adding the words "under God" to the Pledge of Allegiance in 1954. He said he had forgotten and gone back to saying the pledge as he did "in the 6th grade" when explaining why he recited the Pledge for the House of Representative, Tuesday, without those words. But roll the tape, McDermott paused briefly while other members said "under God," then resumed "with liberty."

Representative Jeff Sessions is vocally chastising McDermott, who gained the appellation "Jihad Jim" when visiting Baghdad in late 2002. Last December, he said that the capture of Saddam Hussein was politically timed.

It seems to me that the old man is a tad mean-spirited and a bit disconnected with reality. There are people in most groups the size of Congress who cause trouble merely to watch the effects.

He should not lie about his motivation.

0 comments
 

WANTED: People who aren't there


I thought it would be nice to Al Jazeera, public access for terrorists.

Something called the Islamic Resistance in Iraq has offered a $15-million reward each for the capture of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, US Commander in Iraq, Lieutenant-General Ricardo Sanchez, and his spokesman, Brigadier General Mark Kimmit.

They're distributing leaflets in Fallujah, and some of the deadenders are no doubt looking for Rummy behind the mosques.

0 comments
 

Clinton's Vial of Powder


Someone not identified sent a letter and a vial of powder to former President Bill Clinton's in Harlem. It was not anthrax.

No comment from this end.

0 comments
 

Hot Judicial Nomination


The President is not backing down to Schumer or to any of the other liberal Senators on the Judiciary Committee. The President has nominated Brett Kavanaugh to sit on the United States Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit.

Brett Kavanaugh is the White House attorney who helps select the President's judicial nominees, somr of whom were labeled right wing ideologues, dead on arrival. Ken Kavanaugh was one if Ken Starr's lead Whitewater attorney.
Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah and the committee chairman, extolled Mr. Kavanaugh as a graduate of Yale Law School and a law clerk to three judges. Mr. Hatch also said the American Bar Association had rated Mr. Kavanaugh "well qualified" for the judicial post, on the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Mr. Hatch said it was wrong of opponents to portray Mr. Kavanaugh as a right-wing ideologue. He has devoted a majority of his career to public service, not ideological causes, Mr. Hatch said.
If Kavanaugh's nomination tracks like the President's past "controversial" nominees, there's an outside chance that he might not get his hearing until next year. Arlen Specter will be chairman of Judiciary.

0 comments
 

Thursday's Joint Appearance


This little AP piece says it all:
White House -- President Bush says Thursday's appearance before the 9-11 commission will be a "good opportunity" to help in the panel's work. He says he looks forward to what he terms "the discussion."

Bush will not be under oath, and there'll be no recording or transcript, when he and Vice President Cheney are questioned together behind closed doors at the White House.

Bush says he expects the panel to ask about "what happened leading up to" 9-11 and administration anti-terror efforts in general.

Questioned by reporters as he met with Sweden's prime minister, the president side-stepped a question about the lack of a transcript. And he wouldn't say why the White House insisted he appear jointly with Cheney.
The 9-11 Commission was empanelled, according to their web site to "prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, including preparedness for and the immediate response to the attacks." Despite the three rings added for the circus when the Dick Clarke book tour kicked off last month, this is not an investigation of wrongdoing. For the President to participate, it should not be a game of political gotcha. This is the President of the United States of America, and despite the antics of Administrations left behind, the job is not that of a male lead in a dark comedy film.

He and the Vice President will be there to describe what happened and what is being done to prevent future attacks. If this effort is to be successful, we can't have we can't have pests like EJ Dionne and David Corn dealing faux-indignant to covert what was intended to be a serious effort into a slapstick attempt to shoot substance into flailing campaign.

0 comments
 

UN Resolution on WMD


I am linking to the story from the French wire AFP to prove a broader point.
The United States could get a major victory at the UN Security Council on a new resolution aimed at keeping weapons of mass destruction (WMD) out of the hands of terrorists.
I can write "Working with the international community, President Bush is asking for approval…" What else is new? Our President has always shown internationalists tendencies, short of surrendering sovereignty, even in the face of obstruction.

The French do not report that Great Britain is a co-sponsor of the legislation.

Pakistan, an erstwhile (?) purveyor of nuclear tech through citizen A.Q. Khan, has expressed its concerns that one of the five permanent members of the UNSC could us its permanent veto to exempt itself from the resolution.

From the AFP:
But the measure would still pass with 14 votes in favour on the 15-nation council, even if Pakistan abstains. The United States has called for a vote this week, before Pakistan takes over the Security Council presidency in May.

Hoping to get Islamabad's support, the United States revised language to make the measure non-retroactive so that Pakistan would not be held accountable for the spread of the technology by its nuclear mastermind A.Q. Khan.
In a way, this is a positive sign. President Bush took a necessary risk when he brought Pakistan into the world community after 9-11, and it is good to see them calculating their interests and behaving responsibly. After all, the United States would not sign off on a resolution proscribing the sale of military secrets to the People's Republic of China if it were not non-retroactive so that we would not be held accountable for the facilitation of a sale of such secrets by President Clinton.

0 comments
 

On Wictory Wednesday


It has been established that JF Kerry threw/didn't thrown his/someone else's medals/ribbons over a fence/onto some stairs to protest the Vietnam War/display his love of country. But he'd sooner suddenly bring up the President's already-documented service in the Alabama National Guard.

… tick, tick, tick, tick…

Click RIGHT HERE to be directed to the page where you can become a Bush Team Leader, an official part of the campaign. You can also join by donating at the campaign's SECURE SERVER.

This effort is undersigned by WW founder PoliBundit and the entire cast of Wictory Wednesday bloggers (page a bit to item, to #3).

Let's see this through.

0 comments
 

The Mod Squad


Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter has fended off a Republican primary challenge from the "Republican wing of the Republican Party," conservative Representative Pat Toomey. Specter had led the race all evening by about a 52% - 48% margin, but the gap narrowed to 51% - 49% by morning.

Specter is a member of the Senate GOP Mod Squad, so called because of their self-proclaimed MODeration, with Maine Republicans Susie Collins and Olympia Snowe, Ohio Senator George Voinovich, and Rhode Island Senator Linc Chafee. (Vermont's Jim Jeffords was a premier Mod Squadder until he quit the party for a big deal and subsequent anonymity in the Summer of 2001.)

Specter faces Democrat Representative Joe Hoeffel, who makes Philadelphia Representative Chaka Fattah look like a rabid right winger in the Pennsylvania Dem delegation. There should be no problem there, and hopefully the Doomsday scenarios of Specter at Judiciary will prove false.

In another close race, Representative Bill Shuster (PA=9) fended off a GOP primary challenge by Mike DelGrosso to pull off his own 51% - 49% squeaker. There was no real reason for DelGrosso's challenge, as both candidates were self-proclaimed conservatives, but he was running in a district tickled to have a bona fide primary election after having been represented virtually unopposed by Shuster's dad for 25 years.

Specter, in proclaiming his victory early this AM, said that the party should put its little squabbles in the past and unify to reelect President Bush. We'll reelect President Bush despite Specters troublesome governance, but now Pennsylvania has a lame duck old man, possibly the Republicans; answer to Howard Metzenbaum, all but certain to return to Washington. They do not call him Snarlin' Arlen entirely in jest.

0 comments

4/27/2004

 

The latest...


With 43% Statewide, Specter leads Toomey, 52%-48%.

It's over. The "T," as we call it -- Top and down the middle of the Commonwealth -- is not carrying Toomey by the margin he needed.
0 comments
 

The latest...


With 30% Statewide, Specter leads Toomey, 52%-48%. Toomey's support in the conservative center of the Commonwealth, however, is softer than he had hoped.

The Dems are seeing a surge by candidate Lyndon LaRouche, but it's too little/too late.

0 comments
 

PA Senate...


With 11-percent of the Commonwealth's precincts reporting -- all in the Philadelphia area -- Arlen Specter is leading Pat Toomey 53% to 47%. Specter has to pretty much dominate that region, his strong spot, if he is to match what Toomey is expected to do in central and western Pennslvania.

Of course, no totals of votes were given. Turnout was said to be light, and if it was, that also works against Specter.

0 comments
 

early Pennsylvania results...


Okay, the results are coming in from the east of the Commonwealth -- Philadelphia, etc. -- and Shuster is leading Toomey by eight points. This is the liberal part of the State, of course...

In the Democrat primary, results from the same area, Kerry is leading with 60-percent of the vote. The party's nominee has to do better than this.

Early, early results.

0 comments
 

During the Vietnam War


The Associated Press has published what President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and candidate JF Kerry were doing at the time of the Vietnam war. It's not an overtly biased account, but it is problematic.

There might be an inaccuracy, though. The AP concludes of Kerry:
Kerry's three war injuries -- all minor -- were enough to allow him an early return to stateside duty. After petitioning for honorable discharge six months early in 1969, Kerry ran for a House seat in Massachusetts, but later gave up his bid for the Democratic nomination. He joined Vietnam Veterans Against the War and became its leading spokesman. During a protest in April 1971, Kerry threw his war ribbons over a fence at the Capitol.
Has it been established whether Kerry threw/didn't throw his/someone else's medals/ribbons over a fence/onto some stairs?

0 comments
 

The high cost of gasoline


Saudi Oil Minister Ali al-Naim deputy U.S. Secretary of Energy Kyle McSlarrow duked it out at a public energy security conference over whether the high price of gasoline was caused by the overregulated and overburdened U.S. refining system or by the high prices of crude oil. The United States, of course, took the Kerry approach and blamed the Saudis and the price.
``There is no general shortage of crude oil in today's market -- supplies are readily available,'' Naimi said.

Instead, he pointed to ``balkanized gasoline markets'' that required dozens of different gasoline blends to meet local clean air U.S. requirements.

To increase refining capacity in the United States, Saudi Arabia is prepared to spend $70 million to $100 million to obtain environmental and regulatory permits required to build two new U.S. oil refineries, the first such construction in decades.
The last refinery built in the United States, the Lousiana Refining Division, began production for the Marathon Oil Company in Garyville, Louisiana, in 1976.

McSlarrow argued that the high cost of crude oil has taken the incentive to refine from U.S. Companies.

The following is from Alexander's Gas & Oil Connections - December 6, 2001 [link]:
No new refineries have been built in the US in the past 25 years. And petroleum industry experts say anyone would have to be crazy to launch such an effort -- even though present refineries are running at nearly 100 % of capacity and local gasoline shortages are beginning to crop up.

Why does the industry appear to have built its last refinery?

Three reasons: Refineries are not particularly profitable, environmentalists fight planning and construction every step of the way and government red-tape makes the task all but impossible. The last refinery built in the US was in Garyville, Louisiana, and it started up in 1976.

Energy proposed building a refinery near Portsmouth, Virginia, in the late 1970s, environmental groups and local residents fought the plan -- and it took almost nine years of battles in court and before federal and state regulators before the company cancelled the project in 1984.

Industry officials estimate the cost of building a new refinery at between $ 2 bn and $ 4 bn -- at a time the industry must devote close to $ 20 bn over the next decade to reducing the sulphur content in gasoline and other fuels -- and approval could mean having to collect up to 800 different permits. As if those hurdles weren't enough, the industry's long-term rate of return on capital is just 5 % -- less than could be realized by simply buying US Treasury bonds.

"I'm sure that at some point in the last 20 years someone has considered building a new refinery," says James Halloran, an energy analyst with National City Corp. "But they quickly came to their senses," he adds. [note: They claim their source as Investors Business Daily]
I doubt the Treasury Bond analogy is still applicable, but the point has to be taken.

We have a problem, and cheaper crude oil is not going to solve it.

0 comments
 

GOP economic Priorities


Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) and the House Republicans tody outlined their legislative agenda for spring and summer: cutting taxes and slashing regs. It sounded like a campaign promise of good things ahead, but they will be in a position to write and pass actual legislation to do these things.

We'll figure it out then; as for now, it's talk...

0 comments
 

Kerry's Nowhere in Ohio


Ohio is a battleground, almost certainly a must-win for candidate Kerry, where the Cleveland Plain Dealer reports he has nothing.
He has no field offices. No paid staff. And Kerry bumper stickers are harder to spot than faded "Gore-Lieberman" ones.

Cuyahoga County's Democratic Party headquarters - down the street from the Slovenian National Home in Cleveland, where Kerry appears this afternoon - displays placards in its windows reading, "Elect Dennis Kucinich President."

By contrast, President Bush's re-election campaign, which has had the luxury of time and money to get organized here, fills a Columbus office with 12 paid staffers and acres of signs and bumper stickers. The campaign says it has already signed up 24,000 volunteers, ready to pound on doors for the president.
People are telling Kerry he doesn't have to party 'til after Boston in August.

Things do not look good for the Kerry juggernaut.

0 comments
 

Charlie Cook on Toomey-Hoeffel


What if. Say conservative Representative Pat Toomey upsets incumbent liberal/moderate Senator Arlen Specter in today's Pennsylvania GOP primary. He would then take on Democrat nominee Joe Hoeffel, whom we can assume Specter would defeat easily, but against whom a nominee Toomey and the Republicans would have to work, expending time, money, and effort.

In his Off to the Races e-mail column today, National Journal's Charlie Cooks looks at such a scenario.
[M]ost Democrats… argue -- and most independents observers agree -- that Hoeffel would have an advantage over Toomey if the Allentown Republican knocks off the incumbent in today's GOP primary.

Apart from the simple fact that the state seems to be trending Democratic, Hoeffel would begin with a strong advantage in the Philadelphia suburbs, including his homebase of Montgomery County, as well as Bucks and Delaware Counties. Historically, this has been Republican territory. But Al Gore won all three counties in the 2000 election and Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell won
them in the 2002 gubernatorial contest.
It seems to whom to be trending Democratic? Sure, Pennsylvania voters elected a Dem governor, Ed Rendell, in 2002, but that was more a contest between a good campaign and a bad one. Toomey should not have the problem against a bland Hoeffel.
Like so many suburban counties outside the South, social and cultural issues are driving many suburban voters away from the Republican Party. This is mirrored in the way those same issues tend to be pushing small town and rural voters away from the Democratic Party.
That may be a decent national observation, but… In Philadelphia, this may possibly be true to an extent, but I doubt it is so in the Pittsburgh area in the west.
The tough question for the Toomey campaign in a general election is this: Where outside of your congressional district will you do better than George W. Bush did in 2000, when he took 46 percent while running as a much less ideological candidate than you are today? Where will Hoeffel do worse than Gore?
Put Bush vrs. Gore 2000 away. This race bears no resemblance to that one save the general party labels. (Hoeffel comes from the left of Gore, and Toomey from the right of President Bush.)

Where in the Commonwealth should the campaigns best allocate their resources? That was Mr. Cook's larger question, and if I were in Toomey's campaign, I'd push in the region surrounding the Lehigh Valley and in the West, near Pittsburgh. Hoeffel ought to focus on Philadelphia, its suburbs, Harrisburgh, Erie, urban PA. Or he can go sleep if off in Pennsylvania Dutch country.

0 comments
 

Afghanistan Executes One


In Afghanistan, one Abdullah Shah was convicted of, according to the Associated Press, "killing one wife by pouring boiling water over her body and murdering his infant daughter by bashing her repeatedly against a wall." He was a nasty guy -- read the linked story -- and he was executed with a bullet to the head on April 20. It was first reported today.

The execution itself is not the big story, as I see it; more significant is that that it took place at all. The United Nations officially considers the death penalty to be a violation of human rights, and the first post-Taliban government in Afghanistan was set up by our good friend, U.N. special envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, and Algerian Sunni who brings to mind Henry Kissinger for reasons of the man's maddening aura.

This means that Lakhdar Brahimi can rightly (for him) say that Lakhdar Brahimi has blood on his hands.

What goes around…

0 comments
 

Kerry Lost It


"YAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!"

As I noted last night, Kerry's feeling the heat from the medal/ribbons mine/his thrown/not thrown adventure. He melted down ABC's Good Morning America, and blogger J.B, Corrigan has the play-by-play HERE. You don't want to miss it.

0 comments
 

The Future of the Party?


We have seen it written that today's primary race between liberal Republican Arlen Specter and conservative Representative Pat Toomey is about the future of the Party, who is welcome in the Party, universes colliding in a majestic spectacle of magnificent plumes of fire cascading across the splendiferous hegemony of one-size-fits-all political hegemony.

To be decided by the 35% of Pennsylvania Republicans who are motivated to go to the polls, Which opened at 7a. We voted in a fire hall at 8 o'clock, then my wife purchased one of their apple dumplings for $2.50.

"I'm glad it is not raining," said my wife as we left the building, referring to what the prognosticators had served her the night before, sufficing as a forecast.

I nodded instinctively.

The sun was out, the skies were largely blue, and we had left the polling place ladies chanting: "I think that I shall never see/ A poem lovely as a tree…" They had gone to school when such literature was taught. These days, that poem would be assigned only to establish that it's okay a man, in fact, to be named "Joyce." (Never mind that my ancestor died in World War I and was not married to someone named Ken.)

World changers? Nah. But the "conventional wisdom" again seems too myopic. "Toomey can't beat Joe Hoeffel in November." It was the thesis of the Specter campaign in the waning days, and it did not work for us. It left me hearing music from another time: 1976, when we were told that Ronald Reagan was too conservative to beat the Democrat nominee.

Reagan did beat that same nominee, albeit four long years later. We, as a nation, had to live through four years of President Carter before we proved the conventional wisdom wrong. I am not of a mind to sit through four more years of Arlen Specter…

0 comments
 

Powell never considered resignation


Fueled by the questionable reporting in Bob Woodward's latest novel, the Washington press decided on its own that Secretary of State Colin Powell considered resigning over purported disagreements on the matter of the Iraq invasion. Remember, they've carefully painted Powell as the lone man of principle in a sea of neocons, ultimately duped by "the man."

Powell has already rejected the racist theory of his being a stupid go-along, and he has now said that he did not consider resigning. [Reuters link]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~```

Taegan Goddard links a report that Powell might be moving to run the World Bank after the President's first term.
0 comments
 

Part of the Revolution


Good morning! It's almost time for my wife and I to travel to a firehall to vote. This sun is out, things look find, and the revolution is almost underway.

0 comments

4/26/2004

 

Deaths in the hunt for WMD


If you are part of the top-secret unit designated to search for Saddam's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) -- the Iraqi Survey Group, Iraq is too often a deadly place. At least three were killed when a bomb went off, according to Iraqi witnesses, when they entered a house.
The military initially claimed that a detail of U.S. Army soldiers were about to raid a suspected bomb making factory when two were killed after an explosion.
But the search must go on. Good luck and godspeed. [UPI link]

0 comments
 

Kerry has been hit


When the media raised questions about the President's National Guard service, JF Kerry took the high road, saying that it was not an issue and he was not going to make it one. Perhaps this was because he had something in his closet that he did not want his opposition to extract to counter National Guard questions from the candidate himself.

When the media raised questions about Kerry and his (or someone else's) medals or ribbons being thrown, or not being thrown, by Kerry on his own or at someone else's request, Kerry began to demand proof of "whether or not he showed up for duty in the National Guard. Prove it. That's what we ought to have."

The media raised the questions about the medals. His commanding officer in Vietnam brought up the Purple Heart.

Kerry has been hit, and badly. A campaign built on patriotic service in Vietnam being the ability to lead has nothing if that already questionable justification is removed. MAYBE.

You see, Kerry's campaign is centered around his state of not being George Bush. That has not changed, so he still has his campaign, for what it was worth. But he might soon lose all semblance of being about anything else.

What Kerry can do is wear those medals with pride. That would be political dynamite, speaking at campaign events wearing his military awards.

But where are they?

0 comments
 

Another new column on the RSN site


The latest column by Barbara J. Stock, Muslim Terrorists--Are They Arabian Knights?, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site:
Oh, for the days when knights wore shining armor and came to the rescue of damsels in distress. They slew mythical dragons and searched for the Holy Grail. The world has a different kind of knight these days. King Arthur would take an axe to the Round Table if he were alive today.

Today, there is a kind of "knight" in Middle Eastern countries that is held in high esteem but he doesn't don armor--he wears a bomb-vest. He doesn't mount a magnificent steed but steals a police car and stuffs it with explosives. This noble knight tricks ten year old boys with gifts of toys and sends them off to become unknowing, tiny-mobile- killing-machines. This "knight" is not a brave and honorable man, but a coward who kills children and then celebrates his great victory. [MORE]


0 comments
 

New Column on RSN site


The latest column by Judson Cox, Questioning Kerry's Patriotism, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site:
John Kerry has accused Republicans of questioning his patriotism. Why not question Kerrys patriotism? Should not a candidate for the Presidency of the United States be patriotic? Should he not love and be loyal to the land he hopes to lead? I say yes, and I will question Kerrys patriotism.

Sen. Kerry has a record of engaging in activity that falls just short of treason; he has aided and abetted enemies of the United States. [MORE]


0 comments
 

Veep smacks Kerry around


Vice President Richard B. Cheney today assumed the mantle of Kerry Critic-in-Chief. This is good for several reasons, the most obvious being the unseemliness of the President replying in kind to candidate JF Kerry's political attacks. Another reason is that it forces the Democrats to return fire against the vice president, not the President, which is not what a campaign wants to do.
"It's time for Dick Cheney to call off the Republican attack dogs," said Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe.
Okay. McAuliffe's a lame duck as it is.

Cheney's day before the Supreme Court, including Justice Antonin Scalia, in that bit about his energy panel notes is tomorrow, so he could also be taking the offensive now so as not to seem defensive. An aggressive ticket is better than a purely reactive one.

This makes Kerry's choice of running mate all the more important to Democrats. When Kerry wishes to seem Presidential, even on the campaign trail, he'll turn to the bottom half of the card. If this is to be his main factor, he will want to take a close look at Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, who will brutally attack anything.

0 comments
 

Clinton Book


Former President William J. Clinton (impeached) will see his book published in June.
"It is the fullest and most nuanced account of a presidency ever written, and one of the most revealing and remarkable memoirs I have ever had the honor of publishing," Sonny Mehta, president and editor-in-chief of Alfred A. Knopf, said in a statement Monday.
As progressive is to liberal, nuanced is to b*llsh*t.

Go into the bookstore and check for JF Kerry's name in the index. Legend has it that Clinton was impatient with indecisive politicos.

0 comments
 

Doomsday in Fallujah


I posted earlier about Coaltions plans for bringing Fallujah forward: hospitals, highways, etc. All they have to do is eliminate the resistance.

I did not mean to diminish the significance of the battle, especially for those who will be fighting it. My prayers are with them.

The Jewish scripture (Old Testament to Christians) tells of the early battles for the Promised Land, wherein the Israelites would wipe out tens of thousands of pagan warriors without losing a single man, which sounds incredible, and it requires belief. The circumsances now are different...

Once Fallujah is won, America will be able to focus on what is going right in Iraq. Living in a short-attention-span theater, this country will again have its massive positive injection, the first since the capture of Saddam Hussein last December.

And none of the returning soldiers will ask candidate JF Kerry to throw their medals around.

0 comments
 

No Elections for Hong Kong


Hong Kong's sorta-constitution, "The Basic Law," guarantees a move toward full Democracy starting in 2007, a year after the Brits gave the region to the ChiComs. Now, the Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of the People's Republic of China, all 800 dead souls, voted that there will not no elections in 2007 or for the foreseeable future.. Current Chief Executive Tung Chee-Hwa is an aging boyfriend of Beijing,

0 comments
 

"ticked-off radicals"


That was my term for the ladies who marched on Washington in support of the practice of aboriton last weekend. I've just read a nifty piece by Kathryn-Jean Lopez in NRO, and I feel as they were upon us:
At a pre-march rally on Saturday night at the D.C. Armory by RFK Stadium, California congresswoman Maxine Waters told George W. Bush to "go to hell." Going to hell with him, said Waters, should be John Ashcroft, Don Rumsfeld, and Condi Rice. In a brief, non-impromptu speech, that's what a member of the United States Congress chose to say. (You'll be amused — or horrified — to know she was introduced as "the future president of the United States.")
Have they escaped their ideological compartment? Nah.

Read the Lopez piece HERE.
0 comments
 

Kerry's own religion


The Vatican defines what is an is not the Catholic Church. The Vatican states that pro-aborts should not ask to receive the Eucharist. JF Kerry is pro-abort and asks for (and receives) the Eucharist on Sunday in direct opposition of the Vatican's ruling. Kerry is a Catholic in direct opposition to the Catholic Church.
The Paulist Center attracts Catholics uncomfortable with some of the Vatican's orthodox teachings or who otherwise feel alienated from the Roman Catholic Church.

The congregation includes gay couples, whose adopted children are baptized there, unlike in some other Boston parishes. In November, its leaders refused to read aloud during Mass from a letter opposing gay marriage, as requested by the Massachusetts bishops.

The congregation is not geographical, but ideological, drawing people from as far as away as New Hampshire, said Drew Deskur, the center's music director and a parishioner for 25 years.
The Catholic Church is not a "big tent," to use Lee Atwater's phrase for the Republican Party.

Kerry needs to make like Henry VIII and form his own church, with Teresa and Teddy.


0 comments
 

In Fallujah…


From this Knight-Ridder piece Monday, we learn more of what is happening in and around Fallujah, scene of bitter battles, Bush's last stand, make-or-break for US forces, costing him the election, etc.
Marines at the office, set up between the Marines' base at Camp Fallujah and the city itself, were issuing new identification cards to Iraqi police and civil defense officers - 600 have been given out so far - in a bid to get the Iraqi security agencies functioning again.

Nearby, about 100 sets of shovels, wheelbarrows and axes were piled in a dusty courtyard - part of a Marine effort to, slowly, spread some cash around Fallujah and put the idle back to work. The idea is to hire Fallujans, paying them perhaps $2 a day, to clean up the rubble around the city of 250,000 left by the street battles.

Later, if it's safe, Navy engineers called Seabees will sweep in with front-end loaders to clear out major damage, such as bombed buildings and walls.

Bigger American plans include a new bridge over the Euphrates River, two large secondary schools, two new clinics, an addition to the Fallujah General Hospital and a bypass to the so-called Cloverleaf Highway that links Baghdad to Ramadi and other parts of the province.
But, of course, the American forces must still take full control of the city:
Commanders at 1st Marine Expeditionary Force headquarters describe their campaign to re-establish control over the city in a more nuanced way than using superior air and ground power to storm inside.
We've heard the term "nuanced."

So has the LATimes' Ron Brownstein, who decries candidate JF Kerry lack of nuance when he told Tim Russert that, yes, he supported the President's promises to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon:
So jaws dropped across Washington when Kerry responded with just one word after host Tim Russert asked him on "Meet the Press" whether he supported Bush's promises to Sharon.

"Yes," Kerry said.

"Completely?" Russert followed.

"Yes," Kerry said again.
So Kerry is lacking nuance in Brownstein's book, and, as I noted yesterday, the WashPost's Dana Milbank accuses the President of "skillful use of language and images" in selling the Iraq war to the public. This despite that the President has been derided as unpresidential for his lack of such skill.

0 comments
 

Kerry's Medals/Ribbons



In a 1971 interview with WRC-TV, archived by the Nixon Administration, candidate JF Kerry said, according to the NYTimes:
On the program, an interviewer asked Mr. Kerry to explain what was happening in a photograph of a man hurling a medal, apparently during a protest. Mr. Kerry responded that the veterans had decided that the best way to "wake the country up" about the war was to "renounce the symbols which this country gives, which supposedly reinforces all the things that they have done, and that was the medals themselves."

"And so they decided to give them back to their country," he added.
How many of the "medals themselves" did Kerry say he gave back?

"I gave back, I can't remember, six, seven, eight, nine."

The Cybercast News Service (CNS.com) does a good job of describing what happened on ABC's Good Morning America this morning:
"I never asserted otherwise," Kerry said on Monday -- moments after ABC played part of the 1971 interview in which Kerry indicated he threw his medals over a fence.

"And back then, ribbons, medals were absolutely interchangeable...We all referred to them as the symbols..." Kerry continued. "So the fact is that I have been accurate precisely about what took place. And I am the one who later made clear exactly what happened."
Medals and ribbons used interchangeably, he threw his medals and not his ribbons, and Kerry's starting to feel the heat.
"Good Morning America" anchor Charlie Gibson said he was there 33 years ago when Kerry threw medals over the fence. "I saw you throw medals over the fence, and we didn't find out until later (interrupted) that those were someone else's medals," Gibson said.

Kerry, not listening to the end of Gibson's statement, said, "Charlie, Charlie, you're wrong. That is not what happened. I threw my ribbons across. And all you have to do..." [Gibson tried to clarify that Kerry threw someone else's medals over the fence, but Kerry would not give him an opportunity.]

Kerry eventually clarified that he did throw two medals (not his) over the fence at the request of two veterans.
The story that he threw someone else's medals over the fence, not his own, has been around for a while. But here he says he threw his own ribbons and someone else's medals, though I assume the statement that the terms "medals" and "ribbons" are used interchangeably was still in operation. In fact, Kerry said this to Gibson:
Kerry said what he did in 1971 was unpopular and polarizing: "I threw my ribbons over; I threw the medals of two veterans who asked me to throw them over -- after the ceremony, completely separate. And I'm the one -- if I had something to hide -- I'm the one who made it known exactly what happened. To me, it's one and the same [ribbons, medals] -- and I'm proud of it."
Again, ribbons and medals are "one and the same" to Kerry, yet he distinguishes between tossing his own ribbons and the medals of others.
"We threw away the symbols of the war. I'm proud I stood up and fought against it -- proud I took on Richard Nixon. And I think to this day there's no distinction between the two [medal/ribbons]."
suppose it depends upon what the meaning of the word "is" is.

Kerry called this a "phony issue" and blamed it on the Bush campaign seeking to cover for the President's National Guard service. In its story, the NYTimes carries Kerry's water::
Republicans, nervous about questions regarding President Bush's Air National Guard service, have raised the issue to revive accusations by some veterans that the discarding of medals dishonored those who served and died in the war.
With Gibson, Kerry seemed to agree with the accusations:
Kerry said he didn't want to throw medals or ribbons over the fence to begin with. "I thought we ought to lay them on a table and put them in front of people in a way that wouldn't be as challenging to many Americans. Other veterans felt otherwise. They took a vote...they voted to throw. I threw my ribbons. I didn't have my medals."
Ribbons, medals, what's the difference 'twixt friends?

This is relevant especially because Kerry has made his service in Vietnam and the awards awarded therefrom

As the Amish might tell us: Throw the candidate over the fence some medals/ribbons.

… tick, tick, tick, tick …

0 comments
 

High-Tech Stuff


Good morning. This is the President's "high tech" week, when the President will promise to give everyone high speed internet access and hydrogen fuel tech.

This is something one does to win votes, as this crippled society has been condition to expect love and largesse from their government, which means from the taxes of corporations and other individuals.

Some good:
On broadband, the name for the high-speed Internet connections over phone, cable and satellites, Bush said in a speech last week that America is "lagging a little bit." To encourage more broadband connections, he believes users should not be taxed, and that the government should encourage competition among providers.

Bush has already signed into a law a two-year extension of the Internet Access Tax moratorium, which expired last fall. Now, he's calling on Congress to pass legislation that would extend the moratorium to broadband and make it permanent.

The House has passed a moratorium on user taxes levied against consumers who subscribe to broadband; the Senate is scheduled to address the issue this week.
It's not quite my notion of an unassailable Wall of Separation between 'Net and State. Taxation is arguably the most important part of this.

0 comments

4/25/2004

 

Democrat Outrage!


This one is amusing.

The NYTimes ran a story about a KKKlansman who murdered a black sharecropper. Ugly stuff. Well, the accompanying photo in the paper was not a snap of the klansman; rather, it was a shot of Colorado Senatorial candidate Pete Coors, a Republican.
“It could have been worse,” Watson added. “Pete could have been identified as John Kerry.”

Chris Gates, chairman of the Colorado Democratic Party, demanded an apology.
So, she joked that it was better for a candidate to be compared to a racist murderer than to candidate JF Kerry. It's hyperbole, sarcasm.

The Colorado Democratic Party demanded an apology. The Kerry campaign said that this type of comment turns people off from politics.

Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan said of American politics this Sunday morning on CNN's Late Edition: "You guys are going through your tribal warfare, and it doesn't make sense to talk logically until after November." When we're getting it from Bandar, it must look pretty dang bad.

0 comments
 

Pro-Abortion March


Several hundred thousand ticked-off radicals marched in Washington, DC today in support of the practice of abortion. One account had TV star Whoopi Goldberg waving a coat hanger.

President Bush supports the right to abort only in cases of rape or incest, which is a line he draws, or when a woman's life is in danger. Vice President Dick Cheney talked to the press Saturday:
"It doesn't matter if you're Republican or Democrat, liberal or conservative, male or female, black or white, ... north or south, east or west, all that matters is your respect for the claim of every life," Cheney said in a 10-minute speech to the National Right to Life Committee Educational Trust Fund.

"To be part of this cause is to believe that every mother carrying a life, that every child waiting to be born deserves understanding," he said.
If a society becomes more enlightened as it develops, why are we still having this debate in the year 2004? Why have we made the capital punishment of the most evil of murderers a relatively painless affair while we have some fighting in court for the right to kill babies as a ghastly way as they are being born?

I truly hope, for the sake of humanity, that this debate is not about women's rights or male domination or any of that. I hope beyond hope that it is about a difference of opinion over when human life begins.

0 comments
 

Ahmed Chalabi


This Iranian National Congress boss can be trusted even less than can be Bob Woodward or Saudi Prince Bandar. Someone said that it was the neocons at the Pentagon who so trusted him before the war, but this was from the people who talk of "the neocons at the Pentagon."

At the end of his appearance on Fox News Sunday this AM, he said that the "Iraq people do not understand occupation." I'd counter that many of them do not understand the balance of rights and responsibilities of living in a semi-free society

He said that the President's biggest mistake was not setting up an Iraqi authority in Iraq from the start. This was when the "neocons at the Pentagon" trusted him, and thus he could have been the man in charge, the heir to Saddam Hussein. He wanted that one.

Chris Shays (D-Connecticut) came on FNS next and remarked of Chalabi: "He's not trusted in Iraq, yet he's part of the government." And his nephew is slated to lead the prosecution of Saddam.

0 comments
 

The greatest team in baseball this season


It's safe to say that, come October, the consensus choice of baseball fans from Tokyo to Tampa, Boston to the Bronx, will be the New York Yankees. It will be obvious.

It's early.

That being said, as a Yankees fan, I feel nothing but humility as I type this. Last weekend, the lowly Boston Red Sox defeated the Yankees, three out of four. This weekend, the Sox swept.

The Red Sox have whipped the Yankees in 6 of 7 games this season.

The catcher and a centerfielder who wasn't even supposed to make the team this year are the only ones hitting the baseball. The only decent starter is a 40-something. Sure, Mo Rivera remains the greatest closer in baseball, but he can't do his job -- protecting leads -- if there is no lead to protect.

So I humbly direct you to this post from major Red Sox fan Jaws at JawsBlog. He writes:
Sox Win! Sox Win! Red Sox win 2-0!

The Bronx Infidels™ have been defeated again!

Thus, the Boston Red Sox have swept the Bronx Infidels for the first time in the Bronx since 1999!

Time to get out the brooms to sweep the Bronx Infidels™ (and their fans) away!

Yankees Suck!
He is entitled his jubilation, and I cannot begrudge him that.

It has been a long time since 1999, and it has been even longer since 1918.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ADDENDUM: As Jaws noted in the comments, he is not Red Sox fan; rather's he's an Indians fan. My dad was a Cleveland Indians fan in the '50s, partly to be different from his father, a big Yankees fan. It's from my late grandfather that I got my love of the Bronx Bombers.

So, Jaws and I are conservative bloggers who root for different baseball clubs. Hey, Lee Atwater said we were in a big tent.
0 comments
 

They Chat on TW


I'm back, returned from the drippy gray which hangs like a suspended hazy dome over a landscape which appears to want out of it as badly as do I.

Uh, yeah.

Picking up where we left of, after Steph's chat with Lakhdar Brahimi, it was the TW panel discussion. These things are interesting, as its usually a few government officials sitting with George Will and Fareed Zakaria. Facing the panel is George Stephanopoulos, who can call up video clips by tapping the flat panel sitting in front of him like a raised classroom desk.

Senators John Kyl (R-Arizona) and Joe Biden (D-Delaware) were the guests, and Kyl immediately took on Brahimi's assertion that one should never use military force: "It is the case that at the end of the day [in Iraq], there is going to have to be military action."

Biden suggested that Najaf has to be liberated in such a way as to remove the bad guys without damaging the mosques. He called this "physically impossible" then, without prompting, allowed that he did not know what he was talking about.

He also wants to get Sistani to speak up, assumedly against Moqtada al-Sadr.

George Will opined: "We know who the enemy is: 2,000 to 5,000 insurgents."

Fareed Zakaria countered that the real problem was "not the 2,000" insurgents; rather, it was the ordinary Iraqis who cheered them on.

Will returned that the celebrants are not the problem: "It is the men with rocket launchers and machine guns."

Biden then remarked that Iraqis were afraid to go to the market or to cross the street. He suggested that if a "massive infusion of power is necessary to increase to increase security for the average Iraq," we should use "everything" we have now so that our soldiers can come home later.

This is the world of JF Kerry, where very little is relevant to the actual topic at hand, and thank God that President Bush sits in front of the decision-making process. Whether he makes occasional mistakes or not, he has the course plotted. All systems go.

0 comments
 

Steph talks to Lahkdar Brahimi


They sat in facing chairs in a darkened room, with Lakhdar Brahimi, U.N. Special Envoy to Iraq, striking me as a Eurocrat in the same way that Henry Kissinger. Brahimi, though, is a soft-spoken Algerian. Neither are Eurocrats.

Brahimi is fresh off a loosely anti-Semetic remark last Wednesday, though Steph did not inquire. He did, however, offer that "Israeli policy is war; Israeli policy is brutal, repressive. They are not interested in peace." He passed this off, however, as the feelings of some people. He had said basically the same thing himself on Wednesday.
"There's a lot of hatred because the very violent and repressive security policy of the Israeli government as well as this determination to occupy more and more Palestinian territory."
He said it was not up to him whether Ahmed Chalabi was a member of the new Iraqi government, but he offered his own opinion that people like Chalabi with political parties "should stay out of government." (The United States did not have political parties at the beginning of our Republic, but factions are bound to form in any healthy democracy.)

"There is never any military solution to any problem." This sounds similar to what was said last year by M. Chirac and the poet de Villepin, except that Chirac promptly sent several additional battalions to the Ivory Coast. But Brahimi is a dreamer: "I am a diplomat. I believe that there is always a better solution than shooting." Which may be so if you can convince a group of angry-to-the-death people that his is the case.

He explicitly refused to answer Steph's question concerning whether the U.S. military could act, as in any future Fallujah, without permission from Iraq's new government.

Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani greatly impressed Brahimi, and his description of the man surprised me. I expected a glorified mullah, but Brahimi described Sistani as "highly respected… highly learned…highly well-informed." Sistani is a voracious reader, he explained. "He sounds like somebody who would like to help Iraq stand on its own."

Steph pointed out that Brahimi is involved in these negotiations between the various Islamic sects in Iraq, while he himself is a Sunni. Brahimi answered, "It doesn't come into my thinking that I am a Sunni. I am a U.N. man." (It sounds almost Kerry-esque, though for not for Kerry's reasons. Brahimi assures Steph that he is a believing Sunni. There is a certain intellectual quality to Brahimi that is just not there with Kerry, but that's not a per se compliment.)

Steph noted to Brahimi that: "You must see Sisyphus" in your efforts. Brahimi said, "Yes that rock does seem to want to stay up there."

Sisyphus, according to the Greeks, was that mythical fellow sentenced by the Gods to spend his eternity rolling a rock up a hill only to see it roll to the bottom after the goal had been achieved. But as Homer had it, Sisyphus was also a clever man who outsmarted the PTB for a time to avoid his punishment. That's the Sisyphus I see in Brahimi.

0 comments
 

The Rightsided Newsletter is Posted


The Sunday Rightsided Newsletter, with the summary and analysis of the Sunday shows, has been sent to the various global Inboxes -- and its live on the RSN page: HERE. A little John McCain and Carl Levin, a lot of Bandar, etc.

There was no room left for Steph's interview with UN dude Lakhdar Brahimi -- Bandar's a bulky guy -- so that comes up in this space soon. I'll write it up now, listening to the Yankees. I can report that they are not yet losing to Boston, in the bottom of the 3rd.

0 comments
 

Bandar on Clarke on MTP


Real quick, this is taken from the RSN (rough copy), with Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultain talking to Tim Russert on MTP:
Russert hassled Bandar about the 150 Saudi relatives of bin Laden who flew out of the United States after 9-11. Russert insisted that this occurred when Americans were still under the flight ban. Bandar said that they were not. Bandar explained that he had called the FBI to ask if it could be arranged to fly these people out lest they be the victims of natural hostility. The FBI put him in touch with an Administration official named Richard Clarke, who saw no problems with the request. Russert did not follow up at all on Dick Clarke's role in this.

But Bandar characterized the books that have been written about the Saudis flying out of the United States: "In French, it's 'hogwash.'" Pardonnez-moi?


0 comments
 

The President Becomes Articulate


After his recent press conference, we heard the chatterers declare it the most inarticulate, clumsy even in the history of the republic. But some Americans adored Bush, they lamented, despite his awkward and backward mode of communication.

I sighed myself.

Dana Milibankof the WashPost seized me unprepared this morning when he opined:
With skillful use of language and images, President Bush and his aides have kept the American public from turning against the war in Iraq despite the swelling number of U.S. casualties there.
Do you get it? The President cannot communicate well; however, when people like him despite the way he is botching all that he touches, it has to mean that he is articulating skillfully.

It's an impossible dichotomy which cannot be actual.
Political strategists and public-opinion experts say a good part of this resilience of public support for Bush and the Iraq war stems from the president's oratory. They say Bush has convinced Americans of three key points that strongly influence overall support for the war: that the United States will prevail in Iraq; that the fighting in Iraq is related to the war against al Qaeda; and that most Iraqis and many foreign countries support U.S. actions in Iraq.
Which strategists and "public-opinion experts"?

The United States has prevailed in Iraq; the fighting in Iraq is crucial part of winning the war against terror; and most Iraqis and many foreign countries not only support U.S. actions in Iraq but participate in it. It did not take our newly eloquent President to make these things obvious to me, but it did take him to make them so.

Bookmark the Milibank article so that you can retrieve it the next time some doltish goof begins to lampoon the President's communications skills. Milibank thinks the President is a masterful communicator using his impressive gifts to fool us all.

They cannot have it both ways.

0 comments
 

The Sunday Morning Talk Shows



KEY:
MTP: NBC’s Meet the Press with Tim Russert
FNS: FOX’s Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace
FTN: CBS’s Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer
TW: ABC’s This Week with former Clinton staffer George Stephanopoulos
LE: CNN’s Late Edition with Wolfgang Blitzer

And that's the KEY I use for my Sunday review and analysis of the Sunday Morning Talk Shows, mercifully inimitable, for the free Rightsided Newsletter. If you are interested, please visit our web site or send a blank e-mail to rsn-subscribe [AT] tripod.com.


This is interesting.

On Friday night, I noted that journalist Bob Woodward and Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan were telling different stories about the same series of events: Whether or not Bandar was told about the invasion of Iraq before was Secretary of State Colin Powell. One of them as lying, but which one? Bandar or Woodward? Woodward or Bandar? Neither often tells the truth.

Well, Bandar and Woodward will be host Tim Russert's guests on MTP this morning, and they will hopefully end this insufferable intrigue.


On FNS, host Wallace talks to Representative Chris Shays (R-Connecticut), that New England Republican whom I remember most recently for having penned a letter detailing Dick Clarke's insouciance regarding the terrorist threat during the Clinton Administration, but Clark is yesterday's news.

He has dueling campaign chairs, Marc Racicot for the President and Jeanne Shaheen for Kerry.

His final guest will be Iraqi National Congress president Ahmed Chalabi, who is an arguably more noisy liar than is Woodward, who is also yesterday's news. His nephew, however, was named to prosecute Saddam Hussein for war crimes.


FTN promises to be a dismal affair, with Senators John McCain (R-Arizona) and Carl Levin (D-Michigan). Perhaps McCain will liven things up by tearing someone limb-from-limb.


On TW, it appears that Stef will lead with one of those panel discussions, with Senators Joe Biden (D-Delaware) and John Kyl (R-Arizona) and anti-Semitic U.N. moderator Lakhdar Brahimi. (I can hear Brahimi now: "No, George, I was not being anti-Semitic. However, you see, the Jews…" A global government is bound to be populated by unelected anti-Semites.)


Wolfgang, on LE, will have Senate Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Dick Lugar (R-Indiana) and ranking Dem Joe Biden (D-Delaware). (I haven't seen Biden since he told Schieffer on FTN a few Sundays ago that he had convinced Chirac to join the coalition given certain conditions were me. That went nowhere, and Biden crawled under a rock.)

Another guest will be Bandar. Also, Qatari (pronounced: GUTT-ER-ee) Foreign Minister Hamad Bin Jasim will talk about something. And Blitzer will talk to Karen Hughes, I assume as a contrast to Bandar.

~~~~~

I also want to talk about a story in which President Bush is accused of using brilliant oratorical skills. This from Dana Milibank of the WashPost. These are the same people who accused the President of being a linguistic dunderhead after his press conference.

More on that this afternoon.

0 comments

4/24/2004

 

To whom does the world look?


Take Palestine, the land of the perpetual feud played out by young men with rifles on the one side and young men with bombs strapped to their bodies by cowardly old men they call leaders. From out the chaos, they allegedly look for a solution, but to whom do they look?

The United Nations? The European Union?

From tomorrow's New York Times Magazine:
[Palestinian cabinet member Dr. Saeb] Erekat is a moderate figure and claims to remain hopeful, but even he admitted that without a commitment from the United States for renewed negotiations -- few Palestinians I spoke with during the month I recently spent in Israel and Palestine said they believed the European Union or the United Nations could play a central role -- neither Israelis nor Palestinians would get any closer to peace.
Contrary to what Kerry and the Democrats have repeated for over a year, the United States is respected globally like never before. There is an element of fear, perhaps distrust of our motives, but we are the most capable diplomatic entity in the world, much moreso than under the previous administration.

I don't know that Erekat is a moderate, unless compared to Hamas, but he's most definitely not a Paul Wolfowitz neocon. (Which, by the way, is a term the media has abused to the point of obliterating its actual meaning.)

To whom does the world look? Unless they want oil for food, and the accompanying revenues, it is not to the United Nations. Or to France.

0 comments
 

New on the blogroll


Welcome The Oracle of Jim, fallen from the firmament on this 24th day of April, to the Political Annotation blogroll. So far, he has looked at the ACLU and the chip on its shoulder, as well as the myopia and paramnesia of liberals concerning economic history.

And Jim put this blog in his blogroll, which I noticed in my referral log. I appreciate this.

If anyone here reading would like to exchange blogroll lnks, let me know.

0 comments
 

New Column on RSN site


The latest column by Dennis Campbell, Teflon-Free Clintons: A Lot Sticks, But Little Comes of It, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site:
Remember Pat Schroeder? She was a congresswoman from Colorado during President Ronald Reagan's administration.

What she is best-remembered for is her frustration at the inability of Democrats to make charges of misconduct against Mr. Reagan stick.

"He's the Teflon President!" she lamented.

Well, Bill and Hillary Clinton definitely are not Teflon-coated. They are just the opposite: Lots of stuff sticks. What distresses is that so little comes of it. [MORE]
This one should have been live this morning, but there were sever problems, which reminds me that I ought to do something else with that. In due time.

The Red Sox have now taken five our of six games from the Yankees so far this year. I'm hurting.

Do you or don't you get what you pay for?

0 comments
 

Kerry's Health


ABCNews.com's "NOTED NOW" informs us:
Senator Kerry visited Dr. Zarins at Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Saturday morning, as a follow-up to his shoulder surgery. Campaign staff claimed to be unaware of Kerry's appointment earlier today, but spokesman David Wade now says he had "an appointment" and insists Kerry's shoulder is "doing great."
Meanwhile, according to a Kerry '04 press release, the Navy did not include his medical records with the batch they sent him, so the candidate "reconstituted the military medical records from his personal files." Which means, they are whatever he wanted them to be at the time.

Dr. Gerald R. Doyle, Kerry's personal physician since President Reagan's second term, reviewed these records Kerry had put together, and declared that Kerry was okay.

I want to know about his prostate cancer. Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell (R-Colorado) told Coloradoans several months ago:
Doctors have assured me that after treatment for prostate cancer, the recovery rate is 98 percent. But I believe Coloradans deserve a 100 percent guarantee of service."
Kerry does not mention his cancer, which is a legitimate concern. We know he earned a Purple Heart for being scratched, but not about his more serious current problem.

0 comments
 

Kerry and Church Law

:
Not naming names, the Cardinal at the Vatican who oversees sacraments like the Eucharist, Francis Cardinal Arinze, declared of pro-abortion politicians seeking to take communion: "If the person should not receive it, then it should not be given. Objectively, the answer is there."

Ted Kennedy pronounced: "This is an opinion by one member in the Vatican circle … but he's not speaking for the Pope. That's a major difference." On matters involving the sacrament, Cardinal Arinze is not merely "one member in the Vatican circle," and in the most common sense, he does speak for the Pope.

Then we get this quote from an LATimes story:
Some Catholics argued that Kerry must live to the letter of church law, in public and in private, supporting the prohibition on abortion — or lose the right to Communion and other church privileges. Others accused church leaders of taking too narrow a view of Christian values, saying Kerry proves his faith in other ways, including his support for the poor.
Catholic clergy and the church hierarchy do not oppose abortion merely because it is "church law." It's not "because the Pope says so." And it's not a matter open to debate.

I've heard priest after priest, friar after friar, bishop after bishop, Cardinal after Cardinal explain that innocent human life is fundamental to Christ and thus to the Church. The Eucharist, in which Catholics believe, through a process called transubstantiation, they partake of the actually body and blood of Christ, is their most holy sacrament. This is fundamental, the say, to Catholicism.

The Times article, as exemplified by the paragraph above, is so troublesome precisely because it treats this matter as a secular controversy and church opposition to abortion as a political choice. The Eucharist is treated as just another thing that Catholics do.

I'm going to suggest again that JF Kerry do what King Henry VIII of England did before him. He has a dispute with the church, so he should start his own. The Anglican Church at its inception was identical to the Catholic church save that it was led by the king who could do whatever he wanted. That sounds right for Kerry.

0 comments
 

Socialists who dislike taxes


The BBC runs a story about Scottish socialists protesting a "Council Tax." One would think that a socialist would favor any form of tax, just as a devout libertarian would reject any form of tax on its face, but the case is that the Scots-socialist want only the wealthy to pay the tax. Which sounds a bit like the Democrat Party here in the States, or Arlen Specter.

0 comments
 

Teresa Heinz's tax records


Erick Erickson of Confessions of a Political Junkie and I have been discussing what to do about Teresa Heinz's tax records. His argument was that we should see them, to check her donations to tax-exempts which could be benefiting her husband's campaign. We should know how she is using her ketchup-derived largesse in ways which circumvent campaign law.

My take was that she was not seeking an obvious, not obviously breaking a law, and taking part in the political process in a way in which very wealthy people sometimes do.

His post on Confessions, is an admission to himself that, yeah, she's entitled to some privacy, but he can't help it: he wants to see the records anyway.

Erick's one of the sharpest bloggers going, so I don't feel bad when I admit that part of me agrees with him. Let's see 'em, te-REH-za! If you're Ken Mehlman, you want them to be released, as it is an issue that can only play in your candidate's favor. With the Kerrys attempting to portray themselves as your average, American couple (see this Saturday Washpost piece), this type of behavior on Ms. Heinz's part blows the lid off that strategy.

Plus she'd be playing to the political campaign culture of blah, blah, blah, blah -- get out your flags and photographs of John McCain.

So I've no objection to Mehlman or Erick, or anybody else, requesting that Theresa show us her slip. If not, we can ask why not.

0 comments
 

Kerry's Anti-War Record


Earlier, I posted that candidate JF Kerry still carries the shrapnel from yesterday's battle, and injury he took while fighting for his country. The New York Times continues to fan the flames surrounding his latter, less-than-honorable activity after he received his third Purple Heart and shipped home.

The talk, of course, is of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, a band not so much of brothers, but of misguided Maoist punks. Kerry's latest on this matter was on last Sunday's Meet the Press, when he said he disagreed with some of his harsh language, missed his dark hair, and was, at the time, honest.

The Shrum planned seemed to be to use his war record to take his anti-war record off the table. It did not work, so we'll see what's Shrum's Plan B.

0 comments
 

Kerry Carries Shrapnel


Candidate JF Kerry still carries shrapnel from the wound which earned him his second Purple Heart award, his doctor tells us after reviewing 35 pages of the candidate's medical records.

The story indicates that the records relate that Kerry's first wound, for which he received his first Purple Heart, "was treated with an antibiotic dressing after the shrapnel was removed."


0 comments

4/23/2004

 

Woodward says Bandar lies


Bob Woodward wrote that Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld told Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan about our war plans before anyone had told Colin Powell. Powell call this "insane." Rumsfeld denied it. And then Bandar denied it. Then Woodward asserted that Bandar had called him in the middle of the night to chastise him for the book, but Woodward finally convinced him that the story was accurate. Bandar told Larry King that Cheney and Rumsfeld had told him that the plan was not yet final.

Woodward then told CNN's Wolf Blizer Friday that Bandar was a liar.

Who is lying, Bandar or Woodward? Woodward or Bandar? Bandar or Woodward?

Whom should we trust, Bandar or Woodward? Woodward or Bandar? Bandar or Woodward?

What a choice, and if I had to make it, I'd hope that there were a small capsule hidden in my watch in case of capture.

0 comments
 

Brahimi's problem


UN envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, the man entrusted with working out an interim government for Iraq, told the France's Inter radio Wednesday:
"There's a lot of hatred because the very violent and repressive security policy of the Israeli government as well as this determination to occupy more and more Palestinian territory," said Brahimi, a U.N. undersecretary-general and Annan's top envoy on Iraq.

Brahimi stressed that an eventual solution to Iraq was tied to the situation between the Israelis and Palestinians.

"The problems are linked," he said. "There is no doubt that the great poison in the region is this Israeli policy of domination and the suffering imposed on the Palestinians as well as the perception of all of the population in the region, and beyond, of the injustice of this policy and the equally unjust support ... of the United States for this policy."
U.N. General Secretary [sic, mine] Kofi Annan on Friday tried quickly to distance himself a millimeter or so from his lieutenant's remarks through spokesman Fred Eckherd:
The U.N. spokesman was pressed several times on whether the United Nations believes Israel is spreading "poison" in the region.

"It's a politically complex issue," Eckhard said. "Mr. Brahimi was expressing his personal views. ... The secretary-general's views, as expressed over the last seven years, do not contain the word `poison.'"
Brahimi was merely stating what would be the official views of the United Nations Security Council if the United States did not exercise its veto on anti-Semitic resolution upon anti-Semitic resolution.

Israel will protest.
Israel's deputy U.N. ambassador Arye Mekel said his country was "very disturbed" by Brahimi's statement which "puts the objectivity and fairness of the top U.N. officials in question and increases Israel's suspicion about the motivation of the United Nations."
The United Nations has not been objective and reasonable for several decades, and it has gotten much worse since the fall of the Soviet Union. Failed states seeing no counter to U.S. power sometimes seek to band together and obstruct for its own sake.

Artificial world bodies with prefabricated powers are antithetical to human progress. Brahimi is a symptom.

0 comments
 

Flag Draped Coffins


If the families find it violative of their privacy, or the President finds it same, it is certainly President Bush's prerogative to do so.

The world does not seem to end when the pictures are published.

My wife noted, "The war is worth fighting, but it most certainly isn't cheap." The left have accused the President of banning the publication of the photographs to keep the pictures of flag draped coffins out of the press, lest we become impatient with the war.

When I see a flag-draped coffin, I'm both saddened and proud. And grateful.

Why do I always then have to think of Michael Moore and those whom he dishonors with his breath through his many necks?

0 comments
 

From the Weekly Australian


Roy Eccleston, Washington correspondent for the Weekly Australian writes in Saturday's edition:
WITH large areas of Iraq in chaos, more than 700 US troops dead, and intense criticism of his failure to do more against al-Qa'ida in the first months of his presidency, George W. Bush might have expected to see his re-election campaign take at least a temporary hit.

Instead, Bush appears to have weathered one of the worst periods of his presidency with aplomb, and even increased his margin over Democrat challenger Senator John Kerry, according to two polls this week.
Well, what is the President running against? Does anyone truly know? (The Ultimate Null)

0 comments
 

"Conservatives attack Arlen Specter"


From the NYTimes:
Many conservatives have attacked Mr. Specter for voting against the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, against the nomination of Robert H. Bork to the Supreme Court, against school vouchers and against some tax cuts. He has also angered conservatives by supporting abortion rights, opposing a federal constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage and pushing for what they consider wasteful spending.
So, many conservatives have attacked Mr. Specter for being a liberal.
Many liberals have attacked Mr. Santorum for voting for the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, supporting ANWR, supporting President Bush's conservative judicial nominees, favoring the lives of the unborn, and voting for the President's tax cuts.
That second quote is mine -- having just typed it -- and it makes as much sense as does the Times quote.

Conservatives attack liberals, liberals attack conservatives.

0 comments
 

The War is Kerry's Conundrum


Many in the ABB ("Anybody But Bush") crowd, who make up the largest part of candidate JF Kerry's supporters, want out of the war yesterday. They see the Democrat candidate's position/s as being "fuzzed" (Nader's term) at best, pro-war at worst, as reporters this piece in the Boston Globe.
Leaders of progressive [liberal] groups who are backing Kerry despite reservations about his Iraq stands say they doubt Nader will peel away significant support from Kerry in the fall election.
So does Kerry jettison Nader by going full-fledged anti-war, thus assuring that he loses the election? Or does he continue vacillating, thus hemorrhaging more to Nader and assuring that he loses the election?

It's quite a conundrum.

0 comments
 

A Dichotomy of War


To paraphrase Iraqi pseudo-cleric Moqtada al-Sadr: "If you don't leave me alone, my friends are going to intentionally kill themselves."

Then there is Arizona Cardinals safety Pat Tillman, an Army Ranger.

Never has the difference between punks and men been made more clear.

0 comments
 

Catholic Kerry maintains pro-abort stance


At a rally Friday morning, candidate JF Kerry said that religion and politics do not mix. This was his defense of his pro-abort stance in the face of Frances Cardinal Arinze, the Vatican's prefect of Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments.

At a news conference Thursday, Cardinal Arinze was asked whether priests should refuse the sacrament of the Eucharist (communion) to politicians who are favor the legal practice of abortion. Arinze answered:
"Yes," he replied. "If the person should not receive it, then it should not be given. Objectively, the answer is there."
On the EWTN television network's Web of Faith program this week, Father John Trigilio, PhD, answered a general question regarding a Catholic politician who maintained that he was pro-life personally but pro-choice in governing circumstances.

"I think that person is fooling himself," Tiriglio answered. One cannot compartmentalize his basic beliefs.

Dr. Tiriglio pointed out, also, that a person who votes for any pro-abortion candidate commits a "culpable sin."

To keep this in context, Tiriglio is an expert on the church, the author of several books, and abortion is not on his lips often. Like Cardinal Arinze, he's a Catholic.

As I have suggested, I think it time that John Kerry follow in the footsteps of England's King Henry VIII and form his own church. It will be more difficult, because unlike the old English monarch, Kerry has no followers and cannot compel anyone to join his church. But at least he'll leave the Catholics alone to be Catholic.

0 comments
 

Toomey vrs. Specter - let's do this


Pennsylvania's primary election will be held on Tuesday, and NRO has stepped up its attacks on liberal Republican Senator Arlen Specter, who faces a difficult primary challenge against conservative Representative Pat Toomey.

On their page Friday, we see a new article, Timothy P. Carney's “We Remember Our Friends”, about Specters past and present campaign contributors, including Richard Ben-Veniste, Denise Rich (Marc's ex, Clinton girl), and Teamster's boss Ron Carey.

Then they devote a full section of the NRO page, Election 2004: PA, to links to stories on this race. Carney's Specter Hurts Bush and John J. Miller's piece on Toomey's recent surge in the polls from Thursday, Paul Kengor's Thursday piece casting the primary contests in the terms of the abortion debate. And reprints of John J. Miller's report on Specter from last September, as well as Ramesh Ponnuru's call to arms from March.

To be sure, Tuesday's Pennsylvania primary is a major event in the recent history of modern conservatism, with implications which reach right into the heart of the federal judiciary. Tuesday's outcome could conceivably be felt decades from now.

The nightmare scenario amongst some establishment Republicans has lib Dem Representative Joe Hoeffel knocking of Toomey in November. Even if this would be the case, and Pennsylvanian's choose a radical lefty over a solid conservative, the Commonwealth's Senate delegation would move slightly to the left and the nation would have a more conservative Republican as chairman of Senate Judiciary.

The ranking Republican on Judiciary is Chuck Grassley, who could be chairman of Judiciary only if he gave up chairmanship of the Finance Committee. That's not going to happen, and Specter is next. Knock Specter off, and we have Jon Kyl (R-Arizona). Kyl's life ACU is 97 of 100, to Specter's 43.

To my fellow Pennsylvanians: Let's do this.

0 comments
 

The ban on Ba'athists


With the coalition lifting its ban on some Ba'athist army officers and teachers from serving in official capacities, our old friend Ahmed Chalabi tells us that it will "create major problems in the transition to democracy."

It's understandable bitterness like Chalabi's which created the "bad information" problems with which the Bush Administration is currently being taunted.

The problem with eliminating these people from service -- from throwing the baby out with the Ba'ath-water, so to speak -- is that it removes talented, unideological people from a mix wherein their talents are needed.

Chalabi likens it to "allowing Nazis into the German government immediately after World War Two." That's a simple analogy which I'd buy if you could compare Iraq to Nazi Germany from top-to-bottom, but part of what separates Nazi Germany from other dictatorial regimes is their ideology of pure hatred directed against a particular group of people, the Jews. If Chalabi can show me a system of Ba'athist death camps designed to eliminate a hatred group, and a body of harsh and cruel law applying against that group, then we're looking at a particular, irascible hatred and the Ba'athists must not serve as punishment and prevention from the hatred and anger remaining. If these people were mundane cogs in a workaday dictatorial regime, they can be rehabilitated by opportunity.

And I've not yet had my coffee.


0 comments

4/22/2004

 

A call for Gorelick to testify


Eleven Republic Senators -- Kit Bond (Missouri), joined by Bob Bennett (Utah), Conrad Burns (Montana), Saxby Chambliss (Georgia), Norm Coleman (Minnesota), John Cornyn (Texas), Pete Domenici (New Mexico), Trent Lott (Tennessee Mississippi), Mitch McConnell (Kentucky), Don Nickles (Oklahoma), and Ted Stevens (Alaska) -- have signed a letter Thursday calling on 9-11 Commissioner Jamie Gorelick to testify before the commission about her role in strengthening the wall between the CIA and the FBI during the Clinton Administration.

Meanwhile, Gorelick's role on the panel was questioned early in the panel's work by former acting FBI Director Thomas J. Pickard, who had asserted that Gorelick "resisted efforts by the FBI to expand the counterterrorism effort beyond simple law enforcement tactics and agencies."

And according to this Thursday Washington Times piece, Gorelick can still take part in writing the final report:
Al Felzenberg, spokesman for the commission, said Ms. Gorelick's recusal applies to the time she was deputy attorney general at the Justice Department, so she is free to take part in the investigation and drafting of the report for anything that happened after she left.
I think they are taking seriously this "brethren on the commission" nonsense. It is a temporary investigatory body, it seems, not the SCOTUS.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`

As a nice lady named Charlotte pointed out in the comments below, Senator Lott represents Mississippi, not Tennessee. I know this well, and my mistake has nothing to do with the former GOP leader being from Mississippi and the current from Tennessee. Rather, it is something dysfunctional in my brain. It has to be. I have made the mistake in the past, sometimes in time to catch it myself. Not always. It depends on how many things I am doing or thinking at once; when this reaches the double-digits, mistakes are sometimes made. I'm sorry, Charlotte.
0 comments
 

Kerry Crashes Pool Party


At a Tuesday night pool party in Miami, John Edwards was billed as the featured guest, but candidate JF Kerry crashed:
Looking out at the audience as Edwards stood several paces behind him, Kerry offered up some humor as well: "What a gathering of talent, good looks, brains ... I'm just talking about John Edwards and me."
It's been said that Edwards is a good looking guy, but there could be boisterous debates about Kerry's true intellect.

0 comments
 

John Kerry's SUV


Candidate Kerry, newly remade as this season's Captain Planet, INSISTS:
"I don't own an SUV."
Oh, no? Who owns that Chevrolet Suburban?
"The family has it. I don't have it."
Teresa bought it with her ketchup fortune. Besides, it's a Chevy.
"We're going to keep jobs in America and help the industry be more competitive with foreign manufacturers that are building those cars today."
Splunge.

0 comments
 

New to blogroll: Café Hayek


An Alex Singleton post at the Adam Smith Institute weblog has alerted me to the Café Hayek blog:
Cafe Hayek is run by two lecturers from the Economics Department at George Mason University in Virginia: Prof. Russell Roberts and Prof. Don Boudreaux
.
Their blog is topical, covering topics like how the market will correct overzealous offshoring [outsourcing], and why with trade policy why we should avoid Keynes's phrase: "In the long run, we're all dead."
The outsourcing post is a take I had not heard: that outsourcing sometimes leads to higher costs, and the market will naturally sort it out.

Capitalism is a fundamental law of nature.

0 comments
 

Dem's know: no one knows Kerry


It is becoming obvious to people of both political stripes: though not all would use this term, candidate JF Kerry is the Ultimate Null. He has no personal base of support -- his following made up almost entirely of the A.B.B. crowd -- because he isn't anything. He has promised to define himself, but he is doing so only by attacking the President.

In his WashPost column column today, bearded liberal columnist Richard Cohen insults the President ruthlessly, remarks that Kerry is stalled, and laments:
But so far he [Kerry] has yet to articulate a message and get into rhetorical fighting shape.
Never fear. Cohen has some advice for Kerry:
If I were running the Kerry campaign, I would simply show over and over again Bush's response at his news conference about why he insists on appearing at the Sept. 11 hearings with Vice President Cheney. Bush had no answer -- none whatsoever -- and even a follow-up failed to get a response. (My follow-up would have been to ask if they were going to dress identically.) The look on Bush's face was both telling and scary. He simply had no acceptable answer.
Would that be Kerry's self-definition?

That the President and Vice President are testifying together before the 9-11 Commission, and in fact the 9-11 Commission itself, are not making its appearance on the voters' radar screens. (Note the military metaphor.) The President could render the commercial moot by simply answering. Maybe it is because, as Bob Woodward said on Hardball, it is because Dick Cheney is a genuine conservative and thus has a low opinion of human nature. (Woodward said it. That's his opinion regarding conservatives.)

Either way, at least Cohen is looking at his party's candidate and seeing: NOTHING. The Ultimate Null.

0 comments
 

A new column on the RSN Web site


The latest column by Justin Darr, John Kerry and the UN: an Army of None, is live on the RSN site:
John Kerry's speaking style has all of the excitement and appeal of listening to electric egg beaters. While Mr. Kerry's supporters may call his style "nuanced" (meaning if you do not like it, you lack intelligence), everyone else who has been forced to sit through one of his sleeping pills of a presentation calls it boring. However, when Mr. Kerry speaks of the United Nations, he gets so enthusiastic that he will actually break from his normal droning monotone, and show some verbal inflection! It sounds something like this, "Bzzzzzzzzzzz The U.N. is good, and America sticks! Bzzzzzzzzzzzz." Another fine speech, Senator. [MORE]


Check it out.

0 comments
 

Bush and Missouri


Charles Hammond Jr. wondered aloud in a comment below about how the President will fare in Missouri: "It's also been considered as quite important to any campaign." It has been a bellwether State, to be sure.

I have heard it said that if Kerry were to select Missouri Congressman Dick Gephardt as his running mate, he would win the State. I don't think Gephardt can deliver the State; perhaps Dick can deliver his St. Louis district, but that would probably go Kerry anyway.

Gephardt is not a Statewide candidate, and his ability to deliver union support is questionable after what happened to him in Iowa.

Bush won Missouri by 3.3% last time, March was the month of greatest job growth in the State since Ronald Reagan was in the White House. If I had to call it right now, I'd put it in President's column. And that's 11 electoral votes.

And, Charles, don't write off Illinois. Chicago is problematic, of course, what with Daley and the dead vote -- but the most powerful federal elected official from the State, Speaker Hastert, is a Republican who will be on the campaign trail for the President. That's 21 electoral votes.

It's easier than the media make it sound.

0 comments
 

About that NYTimes Editorial


A Thursday editorial in the NYTImes feebly chastises JF Kerry for not releasing all of his military records from the time he served in Vietnam, and it blasts his wife, Teresa Heinz, for not releasing her tax records.

The tax records are irrelevant, but the military records are not.

The Times editorial opens:
Senator John Kerry's two tours of combat duty in Vietnam should have prepared him well for the political firefight…
I knew that he had served five glorious months on a boat, but I was not aware of his second tour. Was this when he got back on the boat, after having gotten off?

The final paragraph is bothersome:
One of the few sources of comfort for voters in this endless presidential campaign is that there is time to learn what they need to know about the candidates before the conventions in late summer. As the newcomer to the national election stage, Mr. Kerry has more to tell, and more to lose by not doing so early enough that any questions can be asked and answered before his nomination. Why delight critics, and irritate supporters, with a bout of stonewalling that's hardly worth the fight?
Okay, "what they [voters] need to know about the candidates before the conventions in late summer." There is nothing the voters need to know about the candidates before the conventions in late summer, when they become their parties' nominees. What the Democrat voters needed to know was what they needed to know about Kerry before the nominating process was essentially complete. Terence McAuliffe, unfortunately for the Dems, removed that opportunity with his insane frontloading of their primary process. They need a new nominee.

The editorialist could also have meant by that statement that the voters have already learned everything they needed to know about the candidate by the time of the conventions, that there is nothing else they need to know. That puts an arbitrary time limit on the discovery process. After all, voters did not learn that then-candidate George Bush was arrested for D.W.I. when young until the election was almost upon them. (Okay, that was a little bitter sarcasm.)

I don't see the big deal about the ketchup-coated tax records of that woman, Ms. Heinz. Unless there might be an F.E.C. violation, in which case, it should be prosecuted forthwith.

0 comments
 

Mary McGrory: R.I.P.


Syndicated columnist Mary McGrory, 85, died Wednesday night of unspecified causes at George Washington Hospital in DC.

Easily stereotyped but doubtlessly talented, her passing was mourned by such luminaries as WashPost grand-articulator E.J. Dionne and NYTimes wordsmithstress Maureen Dowd.

Also, in a move which some have called racially motivated, America voted Jennifer Hudson and Fantasia Barrino off the island, or whatever, on the popular television program American Idol.

0 comments
 

Happy Earth Day!


Erick Erickson at Confessions of a Political Junkie links a San Francisco Chronicle Op/Ed by a co-founder of Greenpeace who thinks that, until the enviro movement gets the science right, there is "no reason to celebrate Earth Day for millions of people around the globe."

Eric notes: "Like Secretaries Day a/k/a Administrative Professionals Day, Earth Day is a crap holiday."

0 comments
 

Sierra Clubs Survives, Still Goofy


The 112-year-old Sierra Club, purporting to be concerned primarily with the world's natural environment, avoided an attempt by anti-immigration forces to garner seats on the quasi-political group's board. With a record 22.7-percent of the group's members actually voting, the anti-Bush forces retained control of the board, defeating the anti-Bush, anti-immigration crowd. The latter group wailed that population control was a major environmental issue, so we can assume that they are also part of the "save a tree, kill a baby" collective.

Five of the board's 15 seats were contested in the voting which began in March. One could vote via USPS or e-mail, and the results were announced yesterday.

0 comments
 

New column on the RSN site


The latest column by Isaiah Z. Sterrett, Use of Term 'Neocon' is Good Sign For Bush is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site:
THE DIFFERENCE between liberals and lemmings is becoming increasingly unclear. Left-wing columnists, especially, have a mysterious gift for writing exactly the same things as their colleagues. If one writer decides to start shrieking about a certain issue, so will all the others. It is a perpetually hilarious phenomenon.

For the past few weeks, the liberal argument has consisted of calling President Bush and members of his Administration "neocons," or, "neoconservatives." Neoconservatism, of course, is the movement which calls, in part, for an activist foreign policy aimed at spreading freedom throughout the world. (Just from that definition, you can see why liberals don't care for it.) [MORE]


0 comments
 

Specter and Electoral Myths


In this morning's NRO, Timothy P. Carney examines some of the myths behind the GOP Establishment's painfully myopic support of liberal Senator Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania) in his primary bid against conservative Representative Pat Toomey.

Is the party for conservatives? Or must we all move to the middle to retain our place?

0 comments
 

Who will be the Dem nominee?


Good morning. As we've discussed, John Kerry is an unfit presidential nominee. The Democrat Party PTB may be beginning to rue the day they let Terence McAuliffe frontload their nominating process, leaving them with an untested dud candidate.

With that in mind, President Bush might not face Kerry in November. Kerry could implode on his own, or the Democrat PTB could force an implosion, leaving the party free to pick an emergency candidate at their convention this July.

Who will that be that Democrat candidate? Some have suggested Hillary. I have held in the pat that she would not be the nominee since she is not electable, but I think the dynamic has changed slightly. Hillary motivates the ABB crowd, as they are mostly Clinton partisans, and she is capable of attracting voters on her own, something which Kerry is seemingly unable to do.

What of New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson? He can start fresh, the GOP will have limited time to check his record for anything, and he is a bright man to that extent. But he's Hispanic, and typical Dem voters might not go for that.

John Edwards? The Democrat PTB obviously don't think he's ready, but the impression that he could win would override that.

Al Gore? My gawd, no! He's a disgruntled Howard Dean these days, and I'll leave it to you to form that image.

Who do you think?

0 comments

4/21/2004

 

Bob Woodward's Novel


This is from tomorrow's Rightsided Newsletter


Bob Woodward's novel. Of his latest novel, Plan of Attack, Bob Woodward tells us that he has written history. He has certainly had the White House's cooperation, but what he has written is another of Bob Woodward's books. He retrieves individual perceptions of events from half-baked interviews and weaves them into a tale designed to titillate rather than report.

Take the beginning of his interview last September 20 with Don Rumsfeld[transcript]:
Rumsfeld: Okay, a couple of things before we start. I am not great with dates or times and I don't have a lot of notes that can be helpful. The last time we met you asserted things, saying, "You did this or you said that," as though you knew what I did, and you were wrong a lot.

Woodward: I apologize for that. It was based on NSC notes and what other people said.

Rumsfeld: Other people, exactly. And your assumption is, if somebody says that to you, that it is correct. Therefore you assert it to me. That causes me a lot of problems, because then I have to stop and say, "No, that's not right." Almost everything you asked me was premised with an assertion that was either incomplete or wrong, and it changed the whole nature of it. You'd be better off with me if you asked those questions about the premises in the question you want to ask.
In the interview, though, Woodward continued to lead with assertions extrapolating what he chose from Rumsfeld's reaction or lack thereof.

In his book, Woodward alleges that the President began planning the war in November on 2002, showed the plan to everybody but Colin Powell by January of 2003, had Rumsfeld and General Richard Myers brief Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar without telling Powell.

Powell denies it -- "This is becoming insane," he said -- but his problem is that it fits the media's preconceived notion that a distinguished "minority" like General Powell would serve the likes of this administration only as a house servant. Powell, they cried and Woodward is too happy to try to confirm, ambled through his job clueless to the machinations of Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz. The press can say, "Told you so." And its based on dubious work by Woodward.

Also in his boo, Woodward asserts that President Bush secretly and illegally diverted $700-million which Congress had earmarked for fighting the war in Afghanistan to planning the war in Iraq. On FOX News' Hannity & Colmes show Tuesday, Rumsfeld told Sean Hannity this about that [transcript]:
That’s wrong. It’s just his – for whatever reason – has written something that isn’t so. It is a misunderstanding of the situation. The funds that come from the Congress under the Constitution have to be accounted for and in this instance I am sure they were. It is – there are a whole set of complexities as to how it’s done – what they’re authorized for. Some have quite narrow purposes, others have much broader purposes. We have a wonderful group of people in the (sic comptroller) shop in the Department of Defense who spend an enormous amount of time consulting with members of the Congress and the appropriations committees in the House and Senate and their staffs making sure that they understand what we’re doing.
Congressmen from both sides insist that there was nothing illegal, let alone unconstitutional, about using money designated for the war on terror for such preparations.

Woodward insists in his book that Bandar promised to lower oil prices in order to help President Bush in November's election. Or at least that is what candidate Kerry insists. Bandar has denied it. The White House has denied it. And Bob Woodward said that this is not what he wrote.

There is a problem when something like Woodward's book, as well as the media's "gotcha" interpretation of it, are taken as historical fact. Woodward conducted interviews with 75 people and invented history based on his interpretation of what they said. There was no historical fact checking or scholarly comparison of sources. The author took what he had and contrived what he wanted based on this.

This quote from CTV.com sums a media misperception:
Woodward's book follows a number of other scathing insider accounts of the Bush White House, including one by former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and another written by former counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke.
Woodward's book is not a "scathing insider account." Woodward is not an insider. Woodward was not present when these events occurred. He was not present for the conversations for which he invents the dialogue.

0 comments
 

New column on the RSN site


The new column by Jan Ireland, Liberals, Abortion and the Least Among Us, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site:
Children are the least among us, and unborn children the least of those.

To continue abortion in America, liberals must be willing to deny or forget that abortion ends a life - a tiny life of one of the least among us. [MORE]


0 comments
 

What Spain has to say for itself


The French wire AFP tells of new Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos marching to Washington to meet with Colin Powell.
"We are looking to the future," Miguel Angel Moratinos said after meeting US Secretary of State Colin Powell. "The decision to return the troops (from Iraq) is the decision of yesterday."
But Spain is still in on the war on terror:
The main concern of Secretary of State Powell and myself (is) to convey this message that Spain and the United States will be very, very close allies in order to defeat this blight on humanity.
Statements like these undercut the Democrats' contention that President Bush has squandered the world's good will after 9-11 by liberating Iraq, thus harming the war on terror. Even as unfriendly (to the President) government as Spain wants to fight this war.

0 comments
 

Continuity of Congress


House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-Wisconsin) is pushing a measure which would require special Congressional elections to be held within 45 days if 100 or more Representatives are slaughtered en masse, as by a terrorist strike.

Representative Brian Baird (D-Washington) says 45 days is too long if Congress is needed to declare war against someone. He wants a Constitutional Amendment which would allow each Congressman to name a successor who would serve in his stead should he be one of the 100+ killed.

Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R-California) wants a Constitutional Amendment requiring each general election candidate to name three to five "successors-in-the-event," in ranked order, so the voters could vote for that, as well.

Senate vacancies can be filled by the State governors.

My own take is, if we lose 100, the quorum will be smaller until the vacancies are filled by special election. If they're all killed, we don't need a Congress.

0 comments
 

"Kerry's lack of openness may benefit his campaign"


According to Carlos Watson, writing for CNN.com:
A discussion about Kerry's military service would also persuade many voters to take Kerry's military policy more seriously. Indeed, in pointing out that he personally understands what it means to fight and defend the country -- and even to kill -- Kerry could ease any doubt that he would be soft on terrorism or enemies.

[ . . .]
Further discussion of his record, contrasted with the National Guard records of President George Bush and the military deferments of Vice President Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and others, might make the emergence of such a voting bloc that much more likely and give Kerry just the political gift he's looking for.
Kerry's record has been discussed ad infinitum and compared to that of President Bush. Rove's is not relevant to the race, and Cheney's only peripherally.

Kerry's already fought against the "soft on defense" line, and John McCain has partially marginalized it.

The release of his remaining records can help him only if they paint him as the war hero his campaign claims. Anything less will reduce the impact of that issue for him.

Is there some any other actual analysis?

0 comments
 

Beige Book is out!


According to the Federal Reserve's April Beige book report on current economic conditions:
Economic activity increased across the nation from mid-February through early April. The growth was widespread as retail sales moved up noticeably, and manufacturing, mining, energy, tourism and services all grew. In addition, new home construction is strong in a number of districts.
But Kerry sees this country struggling through an economic disaster area, burying the economic dead.

It is morning, not mourning.

0 comments
 

New Bush Ad


The new TV ad for President Bush can be viewed at GeorgeW.Bush.com, and it is called "Doublespeak."

The premise, as stated, is that "John Kerry's problem is not that people don't know him; it's that people do."

Alternating male and female voices read lines regarding Kerry's all-encompassing and varied policy positions from the Boston Herald, Wall Street Journal, and the Manchester Union-Leader regarding the candidate's seemingly congenital vacillation. Then, of course, we hear that "the non-partisan National Journal magazine" has rated him Most Liberal Senator.

Kerry need not define himself. We already know him as the Ultimate Null.

0 comments
 

The Washington Times online


It has not updated since 3:32p Saturday. Strange.

0 comments
 

Bush Leads Kerry in Pennsylvania Poll


Pennsylvania, with 21 electoral votes, is a major "battleground State" in the 2004 election. The State went to eventual the eventual loser, Democrat Al Gore, in 2000. At this early date, the President is leading Democrat John Kerry.

Quinnipiac University Polling Institute
-- April (March) --

Bush - 46% (44%)
Kerry - 42% (45%)


Bush - 45% (44%)
Kerry - 39% (40%)
Nader - 8% (7%)


Twenty-percent said that they could change their mind by November, indicating that there is no 50-50 split in Pennsylvania. (The 50-50 split nationwide is also a fiction, but this poll spoke only of PA.
The institute surveyed 769 registered Pennsylvania voters by telephone between April 13 and April 19. The sampling error margin for the survey is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
This was after Dick Clarke words which were forecast to trash the President's numbers. This was after allegations of this, that, and the other. And it was before candidate Kerry too the time to define himself. Which he is set to do, he tells us.

0 comments
 

Woodward's interview with Rumsfeld


The WashPost has put the transcript of Bob Woodward's interview with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, which took place last September 20.

Rumsfeld begins the interview describing a standard Woodward book much in the same way I have.
Rumsfeld: Okay, a couple of things before we start. I am not great with dates or times and I don't have a lot of notes that can be helpful. The last time we met you asserted things, saying, "You did this or you said that," as though you knew what I did, and you were wrong a lot.

Woodward: I apologize for that. It was based on NSC notes and what other people said.

Rumsfeld: Other people, exactly. And your assumption is, if somebody says that to you, that it is correct. Therefore you assert it to me. That causes me a lot of problems, because then I have to stop and say, "No, that's not right." Almost everything you asked me was premised with an assertion that was either incomplete or wrong, and it changed the whole nature of it. You'd be better off with me if you asked those questions about the premises in the question you want to ask.
The interview itself was a curiosity, and there were few historical facts exchanged, Woodward made statements and Rumsfeld had to either confirm or deny them, and if he didn't know, he had to be clear that his silence would not be interpreted as comfirmation.

The interview is punctuated by Woodward's assertion that he is a "neutral journalist," just trying to "get it right." Then he goes off into a room and spins it into whatever he wants it to be.

It sells books, but I don't buy them.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ADDENDUM: Since Woodward is now releasing his material, when is he going to tell us that Deep Throat was a composite of John Dean, Al Hague, the guy who played "Rollo" on Sanford and Son, David Gergen, and Don Rumsfeld?

0 comments
 

Awards and Vietnam


NRO's Kate O'Beirne, writing in favor of candidate JF Kerry releasing his complete Navy records, including those serrounding his awards, mentions those of the late Navy Admiral Mike Boorda:
[I]t's veterans who are raising questions. The ribbons we civilians admire as colorful adornments represent far more to veterans. Admiral Boorda recognized the importance of an award's integrity to men in uniform.

In 1996, a left-wing news service raised questions about two small "V" clips that the chief of Naval operations wore over two of the medals on his chest full of them. The clips are awarded for valor under fire, and there was some doubt about whether Boorda's two tours in Vietnam aboard combat ships qualified him for the awards, although the Washington Post reported that a 1965 Navy manual appeared to support Boorda's right to wear the clips. Unlike Kerry, the awards did not provide grounds for Boorda to shorten his tours of duty.

Hours before he was scheduled to meet with Newsweek reporters to discuss the controversy, the admiral went to his home at the Navy Yard and shot himself in the chest. The CNO had been in command of the Navy during a troubled period and his leadership was being criticized by its senior officers. Still, among the notes he left was one to "the sailors" expressing his fear that the controversy over his decorations might harm the Navy. Boorda had lied about his age to join the Navy and was the first CNO to rise through the enlisted ranks.
How much does Kerry's military service truly mean to him, besides as a political tool?
0 comments
 

Annan tabs Volker


This United Nationspress release from Monday has this to say:
Three persons have been identified on the independent panel that will conduct an inquiry into the Oil-for-Food humanitarian relief effort for Iraq, a United Nations spokesperson confirmed today in response to press questions in New York.

Asked to name the members, Marie Okabe said the three persons who have been identified are Paul Volker, former head of the United States Federal Reserve Bank, Mark Pieth of Switzerland, an expert against money-laundering in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and Richard Goldstone of South Africa, former Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR).
NPR News reports this morning that Annan has named Volker, one of the chief players in President Reagan's economic revolution, to head the investigation.

0 comments
 

Stuck with Kerry


In his latest Off to the Races column, National Journal political scientist Charlie Cook states that:
Democrats are
happy they got a nominee quickly and with minimal divisiveness within the party, but the honeymoon is over, and they realize Kerry is not necessarily the best candidate in the world.
I figured as much would happen.

He offers a question for a hypothetical:
Kerry did not so much "win" the Democratic nomination as survive the murder-suicide pact in Iowa between former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean and Rep. Richard Gephardt of Missouri that effectively removed the number one and two contenders, allowing numbers three (Kerry) and four (North Carolina Sen. John Edwards) to move to the top two positions. An interesting parlor game would be to contemplate who would have won the Democratic nomination had Kerry not mortgaged his Beacon Hill townhouse and been the best funded and organized candidate after Dean and Gephardt savaged each other on the Iowa television airwaves.
I posit that it would have been John Edwards, who emerged not so much because Candidate A savaged Candidate B, or because candidate Kerry borrowed some ketchup money. Edwards emerged because of his faux-gracious tone and his hackneyed "Two Americas" populism.

But we're not in the parlor, not playing games, and the Dems are stuck with Kerry.

0 comments
 

Wictory Wednesday is upon us


This is the day when we remember that it is we who make Bush/Cheney move. The quarterly fundraising record is now owned by JF Kerry, who raised $54.8-million for the January through March period. The President raised $52.9-million.

Click RIGHT HERE to be directed to the page where you can become a Bush Team Leader, an official part of the campaign. You can also join by donating at the campaign's SECURE SERVER.

This effort is undersigned by WW founder PoliBundit and the entire cast of Wictory Wednesday bloggers (page an inch or so to #3).

Remember, a good deal of Kerry's fundraising came from the indigent maxing out their credit cards on the internet in hopes of free government gifts if their candidate is elected
0 comments
 

New Kerry campaign theme


According to the NYTimes, candidate JF Kerry is going to harp on the environment, more so than did candidate Al Gore last time. (Gore gets a pass, they say, because the environment was not an issue in Texas.)

John Kerry as Captain Planet, Lord of the Biosphere! He's got Carol Browner, another ozone freak, ready to speak for him.

0 comments

4/20/2004

 

Insight on Kerry from the left


From a column in Tuesday's Boston Herald Globe from Bush-basher Derrick Z. Jackson:
It is clear Bush has no shame and should be held to account for what he's done and failed to do. But [Clinton's political guru James] Carville's raging letter and the ''Middle-Class Misery Index'' still leave Kerry himself an enigma. The ABB crowd circled around him as the anti-Bush. No amount of circling the wagons will protect Kerry in the fall if the lead message of his campaign is merely that Bush is a misleader. He can win only if the lead message is how he himself will lead.
Even the left is beginning to see what we've known all along, what I've been saying since at least Iowa: John Kerry isn't anything.

John Kerry is The Ultimate Null, and the Democrats are going to rue Terence McAuliffe's bifurcated nominating process from which a true dud could emerge.

0 comments
 

New Column on RSN site


The latest column by Michael Mina, NATO: No Action, Talk Only?, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site:
With the flare up of hostilities in Iraq and the testimony before the 9-11 Commission grabbing headlines, it is not surprising that many Americans reacted to the recent expansion of NATO with indifference, if they were aware of it at all. The addition of Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia brings the number of NATO countries to twenty-seven. [MORE]
Check it out.

0 comments
 

Saddam's Prosecutor


No one knows when the trial of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein will begin, but its budget for 2004-2005 is $75-million. French lawyer Jacques Verges. says he will be representing Saddam at this trial, which he asserts will be unfair.

The prosecuting attorney will be Yale- and Northwestern-educated Salem Chalabi of Iraqi International Law Group, and if he's anything like his uncle, the trial will be a farce. But he is not his Uncle Ahmed.

On March 9, this came from an Erik Swanson column in the University of New Hampshire paper The New Hampshire:
Salem Chalabi is the Iraqi lawyer in charge of the war crimes issue. According to him, "We'll tailor the trial procedures in such a way that shows we learned the lessons of the Milosevic trial. We don't want the tribunal and people like Saddam to be the principal teller of the history here. We want to bring very specific charges. And the defendants would only be allowed to bring witnesses and make their cases in connection with those specific charges."
(Swanson is outraged that, he says, Saddam will not be able to call as witnesses Donald Rumseld and Ronald Reagan, so you see where that was going, but the Chalabi quote is interesting. (It comes from the New York Times.)

It's better than a Hague venue, and I'll see if I can't get us ticks to this thing.

0 comments
 

New Column on RSN site


The New column by Dennis Campbell, Our Immigration Policy Has Gone Beyond Reckless, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site:
New Mexico Magazine has an entertaining feature called "One of Our 50 is Missing," in which readers cite examples of bureaucrats and others in mostly Eastern states who are convinced the state of New Mexico is a foreign country.

When my wife's mother, born in Las Cruces, attended college in St. Louis decades ago, she was asked if people in New Mexico wore shoes, had indoor plumbing and fought off Indian attacks.

For those of you who live east of Texas, New Mexico became the 47th state on January 6, 1912. [MORE]


0 comments
 

Kerry's War Records


Candidate JF Kerry told host Tim Russert that the records of his service in Vietnam were all open to the press at his HQ. As I wrote in Sunday's Rightsided Newsletter: "It was probably news to all but Kerry."

It was news to the Boston Globe. They sent a reporter, who was turned away. Kerry's press secretary, Michael Meehan, told the paper that they were releasing only what the paper already had.

The NYTimes reports that the Kerry campaign relented this afternoon and began releasing the material.
"Our intent is to make all of those records available," Jean Shaheen, a top adviser to Mr. Kerry, said on CNN. "Most of them are — they're all available on the Web site that we have today. John Kerry has a military record to be proud of. He was decorated in Vietnam."
Bush/Cheney campaign manager Ken Mehlman applauded the Senator's change of heart:
"If he's changed again that's appropriate," said Ken Mehlman, the campaign manager, appearing on the same CNN program. "We think it's good. He has always said he believes in public disclosure."
John Kerry has built his campaign about on his military service and preparedness to lead the country in the war on terror. Let's see his superior officers' evaluations of his service performance. The candidate has released a few letters saying that he was a good boy. Wes Clark released hundreds of pages of records, the President provided anything anyone could find for the press to read.

I could be that the Kerry campaign was holding the records as a last-minute trump card because they are laud him from top to bottom. It could be that he was just simply passable, no real bravado. It could be that he did not belong on the battlefield with real soldiers.

Whatever he was, he is to be applauded for serving. But we don't need him to embellish and contrive his record like in a Bob Woodward book.

0 comments
 

President's religion "a concern"


On Monday, William Douglas and Maria Recio of Knight-Ridder Newspapers opined that the President, in his foreign policy, thinks he is "on a mission from God":
"I also have this belief, strong belief, that freedom is not this country's gift to the world. Freedom is the Almighty's gift to every man and woman in this world," Bush said during a news conference last week. "And as the greatest power on the face of the Earth, we have an obligation to help spread that freedom."
The assert that the President's "revelations [that he prays] have made some uneasy," and they cite Ralph Nader as an example.

However, their problem is not with the President's faith influencing his foreign policy; rather, it is his expression of faith.
Bush's mix of religion and policy could be harming the United States' ability to get more international help in Iraq, according to James Hudnut-Beumler, the dean of Vanderbilt University's Divinity School.

"It probably further damages prospects for the internationalization of the Iraq solution," Hudnut-Beumler said. "Almost nowhere else would a head of government actually speak about the Almighty being the reason for the push of a foreign policy aim. While (Bush's) words just about passed unnoticed here, I guess in places as close as Ottawa, they clunked."
A baseless assertion, but an interesting hunch.

The cite a poli sci prof from Catholic University, John Kenneth White, as insisting that the President is "coming up to the very edge" of the imaginary line between church and state. (White is a good poll guy.)

This country has never elected a professed atheist to higher office. Would they have a President barred from speaking about the fact that he prays, or from praying altogether?

The article dealt with Ralph Nader and a few poli sci profs gnawing on angst.

0 comments
 

Quinnipiac poll: Specter in trouble


Liberal Pennsylvania Republican Senator Arlen Specter finds himself in a tightening race for his party's nomination, suggesting that it may no longer be his party.

Conservative Republican Representative Pat Toomey has closed the gap to 5 points: 49 for Arlen, 44 for Pat, according to the Quinnipiac Polling Institute. The April 7 poll showed Specter leading by 15 points.

The President supports Specter because it seems that Karl Rove has convinced him that a conservative cannot beat ultra-liberal Democrat Representative Joe Hoeffel this November. Conservatives see it as a battle for the GOP between the left and the right.

The primary is next Tuesday.

0 comments
 

Bifurcated Blog Roll


I've bifurcated my blog roll into two, pruned some inactive blogs, and added three new blogs:

GeorgeWBush.com Official Blog - The official blog of Bush/Cheney '04. It's pretty good, as official blogs go.

HughHewitt.com - Morning glory, Hugh, and I might be dating myself. This should have been here from the start.

Instapundit.com - One of the first bloggers, very popular.


And THIS is from Boston Herald columnist Howard Manly, with a hat tip to the Bush campaign blog:
Maybe Kerry believes that we are to have blind faith in what he says, and not believe those lying reporters who get things wrong or those evil Republicans sworn to distort his record. But Kerry on Sunday confused more than he clarified. And that's the tragedy at this point of his campaign. The nation needs clarity, and Kerry came across fuzzier than ever.
'T is the case.

0 comments
 

The bi-partisan 9-11 Commission


Tom Kean, the chairman of the dread 9-11 Commission, promised that the 9-11 Commission would "steer through the distractions and write a fair and balanced report." [link] Fine.

Before the circus which was part of the Dick Clarke book tour, the panel was evidently thoughtful, but it has turned into a war since. Perhaps their final produce will be a serious-minded examination of the problems, but it will not be taken seriously. Kean allowed it to become a spectacle, a notorious face. Everyone has chosen a side, why pontificate on the obvious?

0 comments
 

JF Kerry: The Ultimate Null


Candidate JF Kerry promised the 21 Club in Manhattan that he would begin to define himself this week, and Sunday's gig on Meet Tim Russert was to be the start.

From James Taranto's Best of the Web, off of Monday's OpinionJournal.com:


Here's our favorite passage from John Kerry's interview yesterday on Tim Russert's "Meet the Press":
The Republican Party has spent $50 million in a matter of about seven weeks to distort my record, to completely mislead Americans about me and about my record. Now, we're in a position now to be able to respond and introduce myself to the country. I look forward to that. I look forward to Americans getting to know who I really am.

Let me give you an example. George Bush has no record to run on. He has a record to run away from. He can't come to a city and talk about creating jobs, because he hasn't created them. He's lost them. He can't come anywhere and talk about health care for all Americans, because he has no plan. He can't come and talk about keeping the promise to our children and our schools because he broke it and he doesn't fund it. He can't talk about cleaner air or cleaner water because he's going backwards on those policies.
Yadda yadda yadda. So Kerry's self-definition is "George Bush has no record to run on."



Yes. JF Kerry, the candidate, is The Ultimate Null.

0 comments
 

Nader's Military Strategy


Ralph Nader:
"How do you separate the mainstream Iraqis from the insurgents when the mainstream Iraqis now are increasingly opposed to our presence there and increasingly, quietly or otherwise, supporting the insurgents?'' Nader asked.

"The way you do it is you declare you are getting out,'' he said.
He wants to have the U.N. provide security, run elections now, and give them food to shut them up. Nevermind that the U.N. has no troops with which to provide security, they'll need order and some form of constitution before elections can be legitimate, and the main problem with the food now is distribution. It's difficult to hand out bread when you're beging shot at.

Here's the Knight-Ridder LINK.
0 comments
 

Hillary travels like Tyson


Where's Don King? The girl's travelling like Mike Tyson, with more than a retinue.

Vacationing at the at the exclusive Tryall Club in Hanover, Jamaica for a week ending Sunday, Senator Hillary Rodham. According to a piece in the the Jamaica Observer, her retinue -- including Secret Service and staff -- took up 40 rooms.

No, this is not proof she's angling for a Veep slot of Kerry's ticket. She's not.

0 comments
 

New Column on RSN Web Site


The most recent column by Judson Cox, Is John Kerry a Democrat?, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site:
President Reagan said, "I did not leave the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party left me," when explaining why he became a Republican. Reagan's values were incongruent with Democrats of the 1980's. However, many readers may be surprised at how many of the best principles that guided the Democratic Party of the past find their home in Republican values of today.

Consider the following quotes: [MORE]
Enjoy.

0 comments
 

Negroponte to run Iraq embassy


Good morning. The President named U.N. Ambassador John Negroponte to be the new ambassador to Iraq and take over the United States' largest and most populous world embassy. It's the name that has been circulated of late, and it should be a safe choice; though one never knows with the Democrats in today's Senate. Carl Levin could make the confirmation process difficult if he is told he can score points for JF Kerry.

0 comments

4/19/2004

 

The PRC censors the Veep


Geopolitics. Vice President Dick Cheney had the government of the People's Republic of China promise to talk on TV to the Chinese people, live and uncensored. He tried.
But the broadcast received no advance promotion or even listing in the Chinese news media and was not repeated. The authorities promptly provided leading Web sites with a "full text" of the vice president's remarks, including his answers to questions after the speech, that struck out references to political freedom, Taiwan, North Korea and other issues that propaganda officials considered sensitive.

The censorship showed that even a hopeful sign of political progress in China can be more like a mirage. Officials sought to convey a relaxed attitude about what Mr. Cheney might say in public but worked to alter the record. "What they do to control the media is sometimes surreal," said Yu Maochun, a China expert at the United States Naval Academy who noticed discrepancies between Mr. Cheney's speech and the Chinese transcript. "Censorship is a habit they can't kick."
Indeed.

0 comments
 

National Snapshot


The new ABCNEWS/WashPost poll of 1,200 adults taken between last Thursday and Sunday shows that Dem candidate JF Kerry still isn't doing what the press expected.

The President's approval rating still stands at 51%, with 47% nattering nyet.

The poll has 46% of Americans saying the war in Iraq is a mistake, compared to 52% who support it. In June of 1999, 41% of Americans thought the war in Serbia was a mistake, to 55% in support, of the difference in very small. In January of 2002, 93% favored the war in Afghanistan, the President's "other" ground war.

Kerry is slipping:
last month Kerry led Bush by 15 points among all Americans in trust to handle the deficit; today there's just a single point between them. Kerry led by 12 points in trust to handle the economy; today they're even. They were about even on Iraq (Kerry +1); now it's Bush +11. Even on same-sex marriage, a much lower-tier issue, trust has gone from an even split to a 16-point Bush advantage. And Bush's 21-point lead in trust to handle the campaign against terrorism is unchanged.
The above link is to the ABCNews.com piece on the poll results, while THIS will take you to the WashPost piece.

Remember, the survey was adults, not of registered voters. Also recall that national polls do not directly indicate how a candidate would far in the State-by-State Presidential election.

This poll is indicative of two things: President Bush's inherent support among a majority segment of voters and candidate Kerry's lack of personal support.

Let's see how Kerry defines himself. (He's promised…) If his performance on Sunday's Meet the Press was any indication, and it was supposed to be, he's not going to be able to do it. He's still undefined, even to those of us who are familiar with him.

0 comments
 

Kerry, Saudi Arabia, and Oil Prices


Woodward's book again. During his CBS interview Sunday, Bob Woodward told a story about Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan reassuring the White House that his government would not allow oil prices to rise to the point at which they would influence this November's Presidential election.
"That is outrageous and unacceptable to the American people," Mr. Kerry, the presumed Democratic presidential nominee, declared during a campaign stop in Florida, where the price of gas is a serious issue given the state's reliance on the automobile and fuel costs' effect on tourism.
White House Press Secretary Scott McLellan responded that the President believes market forces should determine the price of oil.

The Saudis said that they don't want to influence the election. That Woodward portrayed it as something else has to do with his desire to make headlines and sell books.

I take it Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah is not one of the myriad of world leaders who told Kerry that the world would end if he did not defeat President Bush this November.

0 comments
 

A New Column on the RSN site


The new column by Barbara J. Stock, Through the Looking Glass, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site.
Did you ever have a day when you feel like you are at the Mad Hatter's Tea party? I've had a week like that. I fully expect that White Rabbit to pop up and announce how late he is for that very important date.

This was the week we all heard a plethora of reporters grill the President on such vital topics as, "When are you going to admit you are responsible for the September 11, 2001 attack on America?" and the immortal, "When are you going to admit you've made so many mistakes." My guess is that the enemy passed out popcorn and was rolling on the floor with spasms of laughter over that press conference that gave him a total pass for the 9/11 attack. Those on the left forgot that it was the terrorists, aka--"the enemy"--that carried out that attack. You remember "the enemy"--not George Bush--I'm referring to Osama bin Laden and company--that enemy. [MORE]


Enjoy.
0 comments
 

New Sentencings for Death Row?


In 2002, in the case of Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), the Supreme Court decided, 7-2, that juries rather than judges must make findings of fact that lead to death sentences.

The Supreme Court today decided to hear Schriro v. Summerlin, a case regarding whether the Ring decision applies retroactively to over 100 death row inmates awaiting the penalty.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled in September that Arizona inmates sent to death row by judges prior to the Supreme Court ruling should have their sentences commuted to life in prison.
Okay, that's the nutty 9th, the court which is attempting to rewrite the Constitution in their own image. When the Court hears their cases, they are usually reversed.

If the Court rules -- and the decision is expected in early July -- to uphold the 9th's decision, the sentences will be commuted to life. The Court could also call for resentencing, or it could toss aside the appeal court's decision altogether and let the death sentences stand.

The Court will not be unanimous, of course. Stevens has this thaang about traditional punishment which fits the offense.
0 comments
 

Theresa Heinz and Arlen Specter


From CNN:
[Teresa Heinz] cut a TV ad for [Pennsylvania's liberal Republican Senator Arlen] Specter in 1992 during his tough post-Anita Hill race. She even gave $1,000 to his short-lived White House bid in '95, the same year she married Sen. John Kerry.
No biggie. Teresa was the widow of Senator John Heinz (R-Pennsylvania), the former senior Senator to Arlen's junior.
While current events have cooled relations between Specter and Heinz (she's not backing him this year; he's not backing her husband's prez bid), it's somehow easier to make sense of their bond than the one between Bush and Specter. Sure, both men have Rs next to their names, but they're on opposite sides of many key issues, including abortion, gun control and some tax cuts.
And Teresa and Arlen are sitting in a tree on those issues.

But Specter's primary opponent, conservative Representative Pat Toomey, will need an election night revolution to off the incumbent. It can happen…

0 comments
 

An International Coaltion


The tiny European nation of Albania -- former Soviet bloc -- has offered to increase its number of troops in Iraq:
Albania told the United States it was prepared to send more non-combat troops to Iraq, the government said Monday, in a possible expansion of the 71-member-strong contingent patrolling the northern city of Mosul under U.S. command.
I've heard that the Albanian contingent will go from 71 to 200 non-combat troops, so it will be largely symbolic at a time when such symbolism is important.
Albania, a predominantly Muslim country, was one of the most vocal backers of the U.S.-led war in Iraq. Although it was unable to provide significant military support, it opened its airspace and offered U.S.-led forces the use of its bases.
If the Democrats do not see Albania as part of the international community, the European Union disagrees.
Brussels aims to bring Albania closer to Europe with a view to its entry into the EU.

Brussels is looking to lay down the principles and priorities to be adopted by Albania so that it can accelerate its assimilation to European norms.


0 comments
 

Zapatero's Internationalism


In his brief inaugural speech Sunday, Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriquez Zapatero spoke of internationalism and the need for Spain to work more closely with the United Nations and the European Union.

Candidate John Kerry has pledged the same things for the United States, telling Tim Russert Sunday that he would personally go to the United Nations and apologize for what President Bush has done.

From a Gweilo Diaries entry from March, I learned of a piece in Newsmax.com which reports on Zapatero:
"I think Kerry will win. I want Kerry to win," Zapatero told Britain's Guardian newspaper, just four days before he swept to victory riding a wave of anti-U.S. feeling sparked by the al Qaeda train bombings in Madrid.

Two days earlier Zapatero had blasted Aznar's alliance with the U.S., calling the Bush administration "the most reactionary American administration in recent times."

"We're aligning ourselves with Kerry," Zapatero proclaimed to the International Herald Tribune. "Our alliance will be for peace, against war, no more deaths for oil, and for a dialogue between the government of Spain and the new Kerry administration."
In this context, the internationalist rhetoric is actually an isolationist dodge, in that committing to unelected international bodies not deriving their powers from the consent of the governed is a way to avoid entering into real alliances.

It's the selling of a nation's soul.

Could this be the next big global political movement? The 1980s saw the market-based conservative led by Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. The 1990s saw the "Third-Way" politics of Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, and Deng Xioping.

Can Kerry be beaten on those terms?

0 comments
 

No Spanish-American War


Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero announced Sunday that Spain would not, as he stated after his March election, wait until June 30 to withdraw Spain's 1,300 troops; he is doing it A.S.A.P.

According to a Associated Press story:
For now, Spain will continue with scheduled troop replacements, including 190 troops to head to Iraq later Monday, the Defense Ministry said. About 240 new troops went to Iraq last week, in addition to 165 earlier this month, a ministry spokesman said. Corresponding numbers of troops in Iraq returned home.
Zapatero cited his campaign promise, not some deeper conviction, in announcing Sunday that he really was going to withdraw the troops.

AND:
"This decision should not affect bilateral relations between Spain and the United States," [Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel] Moratinos said. He said aside from the issue of Iraq, Spain's agenda with the United States would be "wider and more attractive" under Zapatero.
Soon, I hope to have a post up about Zapatero's stated internationalist leanings. His statements are to be understood in that context.
~~~~~
AND:
"We will continue our close coooperation with our NATO ally Spain in fighting the war against terror," White House spokesman Ken Lisaius said.

"We will work with our coalition partners in Iraq and the Spanish government and expect they will implement their decision in a coordinated, responsible and orderly manner."

0 comments
 

Is Condoleezza Rice Married?


I picked this one up off Taegan Goddard's Political Wire.

From Deborah Schoeneman's Intelligencer column on New York magazine's web site:
A pressing issue of dinner-party etiquette is vexing Washington, according to a story now making the D.C. rounds: How should you react when your guest, in this case national-security adviser Condoleezza Rice, makes a poignant faux pas? At a recent dinner party hosted by New York Times D.C. bureau chief Philip Taubman and his wife, Times reporter Felicity Barringer, and attended by Arthur Sulzberger Jr., Maureen Dowd, Steven Weisman, and Elisabeth Bumiller, Rice was reportedly overheard saying, “As I was telling my husb—” and then stopping herself abruptly, before saying, “As I was telling President Bush.” Jaws dropped, but a guest says the slip by the unmarried politician, who spends weekends with the president and his wife, seemed more psychologically telling than incriminating. Nobody thinks Bush and Rice are actually an item. A National Security Council spokesman laughed and said, “No comment.”
At least they get along.

0 comments
 

Our Miss Cynthia


In 2002, former Georgia Congress critter Cynthia McKinney (D-Georgia) said the following in a radio interview:
"We know there were numerous warnings of the events to come on September 11th. . . . What did this administration know and when did it know it, about the events of September 11th? Who else knew, and why did they not warn the innocent people of New York who were needlessly murdered? . . . What do they have to hide?"
She lost her GA-4 Democrat primary that year to Denise Majette, also an African American, but Cynthia claimed racism and malicious crossover voting. Her father Bill blamed her loss on "the Jews." (We know where the younger McKinney gets her mindset: it's something lacking in her uprbringing.)

Today, our Miss Cynthia proclaims that the 9-11 Commission has proven that she was right, that President Bush knew in advance of what would happen on September 11.
"The Bush administration keeps giving us answers that don't answer, explanations that don't explain, and conclusions that don't conclude," McKinney said in Friday's interview.

She praised the 10-member commission examining pre-Sept. 11 intelligence failures and said she found "absolutely riveting" the testimony by former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke, who depicted Bush as focused on invading Iraq, even when told that country had nothing to do with the attacks.
Just so we know she's still out there, both literally and figuratively.

0 comments

4/18/2004

 

Al Gore, Dukakis, and Fritz


I saw a headline -- Former Democratic presidential candidate criticizes Bush -- and I hoped for a chuckle or at least a smile. Who could it be? Al Gore? It would be great if he would start attacking the President and campaigning, even uninvited, for John Kerry?

Maybe Mike Dukakis. The penultimate "Massachusetts liberal" (behind Teddy, of course). With Kerry trying to define himself as a centrist, Dukakis on the campaign trail would be solid gold for the President.

What about Fritz? Splendid! Walter Mondale would be the kiss of death to Kerry.

But I read the USAToday piece, and it talked of Wes Clark telling Nebraska Democrats that President ignored the warning signs of 9-11. I feel cheated.

Wes Clark was not even a "presidential candidate"; rather, he was a candidate for the Dem presidential nomination. And I thought we'd long ago established that he was never really a Democrat.

What Kerry's campaign needs is Al Gore, Dukakis, and Fritz. Maybe Jesse Jackson could negotiate them into action.

"Anybody here seen my old friend Al Gore? ..."

0 comments
 

Two Tales of Bob Woodward


CBSNews.com runs its story under the headline: "Early Iraq Plans Confirmed."

The story reports:
The White House confirms a passage in the book about a meeting in November 2001 between President Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld that put the planning in motion, but says that did not mean Mr. Bush was set on a course of attacking Iraq at that point.
It adds:
The Woodward book is packed with previously secret stories out of the mouths of Mr. Bush and his top aides on the year preceding the president's final decision to go to war against Saddam.
If the White House told Woodward this stuff, why were they asked to confirm it?

In the meantime, the NYTimes story runs under the headline: Rice Refutes New Book on Date That Bush Decided to Go to War.
In an interview on the CBS News program "60 Minutes," Mr. Woodward said Mr. Bush first told his senior advisers about his decision in early January 2003. "He told Condi Rice," Mr. Woodward said. "He told Rumsfeld. He knew Cheney wanted to do this. And they realized they haven't told Colin Powell," who was skeptical about the wisdom of invading Iraq.
As I reported earlier, Dr. Rice refuted Woodward's assertion this morning on Face the Nation:
ondoleezza Rice, President Bush's national security adviser, said today that the president decided in March 2003 to go to war against Saddam Hussein, not in January 2003, as a new book contends.

She said she was with Mr. Bush in Crawford, Tex., in January 2003 when he expressed his frustration with how weapons inspections were proceeding in Iraq. "He said, `Now, I think we probably are going to have to go to war, we're going to have to go to war,' " Ms. Rice recalled today on the CBS News program "Face the Nation." "It was not a decision to go to war. That decision he made in March when he finally decided to do that."
I think Bob Woodward is fine for what he does, but we have to be clear what it is that he does.

0 comments
 

Rice on Woodward


When journalist Bob Woodward writes a book, he takes facts gleaned from interviews and extrapolates on them, inventing conversations and scenarios. The books are entertaining to people who enjoy provocative novels are news with a hint of Weekly World News.

On CBS's Face the Nation, the topic of Woodward's interview this evening on the CBS infotainment program 60 Minutes was front-and-center as host Bob Schieffer and Newsweek's Karen Tumulty grilled Condoleezza Rice.

This is from today's Rightsided Newsletter:
Dr. Rice, Bob Woodward, and FTN. Though not physically on this morning's FTN, a Bob Woodward interview will air on tonight's episode of 60 Minutes on the same network, so this was the perfect place to plug it.

They played a clip with Woodward describing to Mike Wallace a conversation between President Bush and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice in which the President is alleged to have told Rice that we had to go to war with Iraq. Rice supposedly told the President that he had better tell Secretary of State Colin Powell. Rice, who had nothing but nice things to say about Woodward, explained that Powell was not in Texas at the time, and that it was not a Presidential decision to go to war. The President was merely pointing out that if the diplomacy was not working, we would have to go to war. Rice told the President -- though she insisted that he of course knew this -- that he should talk to Powell before a final decision was made.

The second item from Woodward's book with which Rice was accosted was that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Joint Chiefs Chairman General Richard Myers had briefed Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar about the war plans before Powell was told of them. Rice explained that Bandar was told because he represented an important regional country, and that Powell knew all of this beforehand.

Karen Tumulty of Newsweek, who had joined Schieffer in asking questions, wanted to know about Woodward's allegation that CIA Director George Tenet had told the President that Saddam Hussein possessing weapons of mass destruction was "a slam dunk case." This was in response to the President asking why the intelligence didn't fit the story.

Rice explained that "everyone believed at that time" that the WMD existed. Tumulty insisted that everyone had been wrong. Rice answered: "The stockpiles have not been found, and no one can account for them." This is similar to what British Prime Minister Tony Blair said later (see below).

Tumulty would not accept Rice's description of events, so: "Mrs. Tumulty, I was there. The President asked why the intelligence did not match what he was told." It was not what Woodward wrote about as if he had participated. This is a Woodward trick which stirs the drama of the book but renders it essentially a work of quasi-historical fiction.

"George Tenet is a fine director of Central Intelligence."
It is foolhardy to report on the contents of these Woodward as pure fact.

0 comments
 

Kerry's Foreign Friends


I missed Kerry's response to Russert concerning the foreign leaders with whom he chats.

The original QUOTE: "I have met more leaders who can't go out and say it publicly, but, boy, they look at you and say 'You've got to win this. You've got to beat this guy. We need a new policy,' things like that."
Russert this morning: "But you have talked to foreign leaders?”

Kerry: "Tim, what I said is true. You can go to New York City and be in a restaurant and meet a foreign leader. There are plenty of places to meet people without traveling abroad.”
RNC Research examined the press and found Kofi Annan at The Four Seasons last September and Jacques Chirac at Daniel in 1999 with Kofi. (Jacques prefers Gallagher's steak house, according to the French wire AFP.)
"I would be stupid if I were to sit here and start saying, 'Well, so-and-so told me this,' because they have dealings with this administration," he said. "This administration doesn't talk about its private conversations and nor will I."

Kerry said it was inaccurate to conclude that trips abroad or foreign leaders' visits to the United States were the only opportunities "where I might be able to meet or talk" to them.

"I invite you ... go to Europe, go to foreign capitals, travel in the world," he said. "Talk to any American businessman who has been abroad. Talk to any of our colleagues who have traveled abroad, and the conversations they've had."

"We're not trusted, and this administration is not liked."
The question is not whether or not the Administration liked overseas. I don't know, having not hobnobbed with the sundry foreign leaders. Kerry says he has.

We're not asking about the conversations of businessmen or colleagues. It was Kerry who made the assertion.

Hey, if Bob Woodward can invent conversations at which he was not present, Kerry discuss President Bush with foreign leaders with whom he has not discussed President Bush.

Kerry had better soon define himself as something other than a _________________.

0 comments
 

Today's Rightsided Newsletter online (finally)


In between a family activities, server problems, and shopping with the wife, I have finally got today's Rightsided Newsletter -- the Sunday Shows -- posted online HERE.

In the header, I neglected to change it from Easter, but it is the Second Sunday of Easter, so I get a bye for that.

Also, I neglected to dedicate it to my late mother, Judith, who was born 64 years ago today. My mom died too young.
0 comments
 

Kerry and Republicans


Last Friday, I posted that candidate JF Kerry had claimed: "There are so many Republicans who have said to me: `You know, for the first time in my life, I'm going to vote for a Democrat. I'm ready to switch over.' " I posited that I thought it safe to say that "Kerry invented them to make a point."

This drew a comment from Daniel A. Munz: "There's very, very little that could improve this post. Except, of course, for it being true." He offered a url -- http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/03/26/moderates/index_np.html, which led to a piece from Salon.com.

The headline is: "Republican for Kerry?" A good question, but what says Salon.com? First, they insist that moderate Republicans feel squeezed-out by the "party's rightward lurch." The same thing was predicted if Ronald Reagan were to win the party's nomination in both 1976 and 1980. Then we heard the same cry throughout Reagan's two terms. And after the "revolution" of 1994. It's nothing new. Some souls are disaffected if the wind ruffles their toupee; all a reporter must do is look.

The President's spending proclivities in some areas should keep the left of the party happy.

From the Salon.com piece:
Few politicians want to admit the split, but it's getting almost impossible to ignore. Former Bush counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke, a Republican who has served four administrations – three of them Republican – slammed Bush this week for a weak response to the threat of terrorism before the Sept. 11 attacks.
Dick Clark never claimed to be a Republican. He claimed to have once asked for an GOP ballot in Virginia's open primary. He was a government employee, serving not party but President. His favorite administration was a Democrat Administration.
Now he's being savaged by fellow Republicans who have, in essence, accused him of working to aid the Democrats.
I've not heard of this. If true, it is from a little pocket of disgruntled souls.
. McCain, the Arizona senator, along with Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel, have made headlines by openly defending Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry, a fellow Vietnam vet, against Bush campaign charges that Kerry's weak on national defense.
McCain said that he didn't think Kerry was "necessarily" weak on defense. He did not mount a rigorous defense, and neither did Hagel. They disagreed, saying that Kerry was alright on defense.
The White House is incensed.
No they are not.

The Salon.com piece was really an empty article. You can't dance to it. Find something else to really document a mass defection, Daniel. And lets hear something of these "so many Republicans" to whom Kerry has spoken?

A Yale man should know better.

0 comments
 

JF Kerry on Meet the Press


Here's the first draft of what I wrote for the Rightsided Newsletter about candidate JF Kerry's pit stop with Tim Russert. The full RSN will be online on its page once I've finished it....

John Kerry on MTP. He promised donors at the "21" Club in New York last week that he would soon begin to define himself for voters, and the process is underway. We give him poor grades for his first move, but it's difficult even for a skilled politician to come into his own while talking to Tim Russert. Kerry said: "We're in a position now to let the American people know who I really am." He then explained that the President has "no record to run on"; rather, the President has a record "to run against." He followed this by accusing the President of lying to his own advisors.

On the diplomatic front, Kerry accused the President of "stunningly ineffective diplomacy" and pledged, if elected, to go personally to the UN and to foreign capitols and beg for support. He was empower his Secretary of State, he said, to be a real Secretary of State. He would go before the U.N. and "rejoin the community of nations," which implies that he will bend his knee and show the contrition to the international community which many Democrats have demanded of President Bush.

Russert quoted the Kerry pledge to include NATO and the UN in the Iraqi process and asked if the UN and NATO would be willing to help. Kerry replied: "Tim, that is the dilemma that the Administration has put us in." He said the Administration has blown three opportunities to get international help: 1. when he refused to give the U.N. inspectors more time, "when the statue of Saddam fell" and Kofi Annan offered to help, and in his speech to the U.N. General Assembly last autumn.

Russert quoted Kerry from a 1970 interview in which he had said that the only just use of U.S. troops was with a U.N. mandate. Kerry laughed and said that those were the words of a 27-year-old who had just returned from Vietnam and was angry. He promised that no country would have a veto over matters of U.S. security, this despite his statements earlier and later on MTP this morning. Sayeth Kerry: "Multilateralism is no weakness. It's strength."

Russert displayed the Kerry quote from FTN last September in which the candidate said that he would vote for the $87-billion to fund our troops in Iraq even if Joe Biden's amendment raise taxes to pay for it were defeat. Kerry voted against the $87-billion, though, and today he accused the President of having threatened to veto the measure if it were changed. He is claiming no to know the difference between a tactical veto threat and an actual vote against a measure funding our troops. Russert did not ask Kerry if he voted against the measure because he was among the Democrats at the time who were perceived to be losing the battle for his party's nomination to Howard Dean.

Kerry reiterated that his feeling that the war on terror was primarily one of intelligence gathering, diplomacy, and law enforcement, not military. Even looking at the nuance, which no one is going to do, it was a insane thing to think and say. And it can only hurt him politically.

Russert quoted Kerry as saying that he would not speak against the war while our troops were in harms way, as it is bad for cohesion and morale. Kerry said that he stuck to his pledge, did not speak out against the war until after our troops had succeeded in their goal. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. So to Kerry, that banner on the U.S.S. Lincoln was accurate, even though the President said in his speech that there was still a lot of work left to do.

Russert quoted Kerry in 2000 as saying that the "politics of Florida" were the only reason the boycott against Cuba had not been lifted. Now that he is trying to appeal to Florida's Cuban-American community, Kerry told Russert that the "politics in 2000 were different" than they are today.

Russert played a clip of a young John Kerry, in military greens, appearing on MTP - April 18, 1971. In the clip, Kerry admitted to personally taking part in the atrocities of war, slaughtering villagers, etc. He condemned his higher-ups for giving the orders. This morning, Kerry laughed and said: "Where did the dark hair go? That's the real question, Tim."

Kerry said his words were "honest, but they were a little bit over the top." They reflected the anger of the time. He did not like the words, but he insisted he was "honest." Russert did not question him about the individual atrocities in which he claimed to have taken part.

Addressing the assertion of his commanding officer in Vietnam that Kerry's first Purple Heart award was bogus, Kerry insisted that he was in combat, there was shrapnel, and the Navy thought at the time that he deserved the medal. He told Russert that all of his military records were available to the press at his campaign headquarters, something which Russert appeared not to have known.

Kerry addressed the claims of several years ago by Kerry's wife, Teresa Heinz, that he still has nightmares about Vietnam. Kerry laughed and said that he did not.

We're still waiting for a definition, and it is questionable if there is anything to define.

0 comments
 

Carl Levin on This Week


Levin just told George Stephanopoulos that the failure of President Bush to go internationalize the war before it began "is bearing heavy costs now to our country and to our troops."

The President costs lives?

He also said that "NATO is not quite an international coalition." (Nuance?)

good stuff.
0 comments
 

John Kerry on Meet the Press


I'm writing about it for the RSN now, but it was interesting. Kerry opened by saying that the President did not have a record to run on; rather, he had a record to run against. He then accused President Bush of lying to his advisors.

Russert later played a clip of Kerry on MTP from April 18, 1971. A young John Kerry admitted personally to have taken part in various war atrocities and blamed his superiors. Kerry did not address this directly, but said his comments were honest but "reflected anger."

...tick, tick, tick, tick...
0 comments
 

Book of the Month


This snippet comes from Korean News: News From KOREAN CENTRAL NEWS AGENCY of DPRK, Friday:
Pyongyang, April 16 (KCNA) -- Leader Kim Jong Il's famous work "The Workers' Party of Korea Is the Party of the Great Leader Comrade Kim Il Sung" was brought out in booklet by the National Education Publishing House of Guinea on April 6.
I'm forever a student of politics, including geopolitics, and this sounds like a must read. I'll be sure to pick up a copy next time I'm in Guinea. If you'd like a copy for your own library, give me a holler.

0 comments
 

It's Sunday morning…


The shows come on in an hour, then I have other obligations, then I'll finish today's Rightsided Newsletter review of the shows….

I found on the FOX New site, this AM, the story of New York's liberal Republican Governor George Pataki essentially blaming Clinton for 9-11.
Pataki criticized the Clinton administration for not properly responding to the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, attacks on U.S. embassies in Africa, the bombing of the USS Cole and an attack on a U.S. military barracks in Saudi Arabia.
Now, some have argued against such claims, calling them mere partisan name-calling and sniping.

Truth be told, any truly intellectual discussion of a problem must have that flavor, in that no worthwhile examination of such a situation does not look at the causes and solutions, each of which might indicate a faction.

Bipartisanship, for its own sake, is dull. It refuses to describe the essence of events and predicaments.

Whether Clinton helped to foster an environment in which anti-U.S. terror could take wing seems to me to be inarguable; however, since he did not do so intentionally, or even knowingly, one cannot reasonably blame him. He simply did not understand and forecast the minds of terrorists years into the future. Perhaps the terrorists themselves could not do this.

0 comments

4/17/2004

 

Sad news from Kosovo


From the Associated Press, we learn that a group of "U.N. policemen" were casualties of Kosovo Saturday -- 2 Americans killed, 10 Americans and an Austrian wounded. The assailant was a Jordanian.
Kosovo became a U.N. protectorate in 1999, after NATO launched a 78-day air war to stop Serb leader Slobodan Milosevic from cracking down on ethnic Albanians seeking independence.
The world is a dangerous place, and whether we are stopping Slobodan Milosevic or Saddam Hussein, it won't be easy.

War is hell, you know.

0 comments
 

The Sunday Morning Talk Shows



KEY:
MTP: NBC’s Meet the Press with Tim Russert
FNS: FOX’s Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace
FTN: CBS’s Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer
TW: ABC’s This Week with former Clinton staffer George Stephanopoulos
LE: CNN’s Late Edition with Wolfgang Blitzer

And that's the KEY I use for my Sunday review and analysis of the Sunday Morning Talk Shows, mercifully inimitable, for the free Rightsided Newsletter. If you are interested, please visit our web site or send a blank e-mail to rsn-subscribe [AT] tripod.com.


If heads could talk, we’d have talking heads. Well///

John F. Kerry gets the full hour on MTP. Before we scream "EQUAL TIME," remember that the President talked to the press last Sunday at his ranch, held his press conference Tuesday, had a press conference with Ariel Sharon then another with Tony Blair, and he wasn't asked many worthwhile questions. Russert at least lends a decent query or two, and I guarantee that there will be one line of questioning about rolling back tax cuts.

Is this where Kerry begins to "define himself"? He promised supporters that it would be soon.



On FNS, host Wallace talks to outgoing Spanish Prime Minister José Maria Aznar the National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice. We will probably get some affirming words from Aznar, "no regrets," which would cast him in a similar category as British Tory Prime Minister Winston Churchill.



Dr. Rice gets the whole half hour on FTN.


On TW, Steph talks to British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Dr. Rice, and… Senator Carl Levin (D-Michigan).


LE features Senators John Warner (R-Virginia) and Joe Lieberman (D-Connecticut), General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and in the lone appearance by a 9-11 Commissioner, John Lehman. Ralph Nader is scheduled, as well, but he's probably second hour stuff.


It looks like a good morning, and the weather will be nice at RSN HQ.

The Yanks lost again today, and the team is unable to hit the baseball.

0 comments
 

"Bake Back the White House


MoveOn.org, an organization funded largely by billionaire George Soros, says it held at least 1,000 bake sales nationwide to raise money, it said, to oust President Bush.

They don't need the money. It is important, though, to make the grassroots feel as if they are needed. This motivates them and makes them feel they have a stake in the movement.

A little psych from the Moveon.org.

0 comments
 

Deaths in the Middle East


Hamas and the al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, part of Arafat's outfit, killed an Israeli border guard, Cpl. Kfir Ohayon, 20, and wounded three others by using a 22-year-old Palestinian as a suicide bomber.

Unrelated, new Hamas chief Abdel Aziz Rantisi was killed when his car was struck Saturday by an Israeli helicopter missile. Late last month, Rantisi declared:
“We knew that Bush is the enemy of God, the enemy of Islam and Muslims. America declared war against God. Sharon declared war against God and God declared war against America, Bush and Sharon,” Rantisi said.

“The war of God continues against them, and I can see the victory coming up from the land of Palestine by the hand of Hamas,” he added.
Like Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, and even moreso, Rantisi was an enemy of peace. However, his death doesn't further the peace process unless the Palestians can find a representative who will negotiate their points in good faith.

Perhaps U.N. special envoy Lakhdar Brahimi can come up with a plan, the Security Council can pass it, and they can all live happily ever after. Right? Was Rantisi a go-it-alone cowboy?

0 comments
 

Tenet should Resign?


A curiousity. An Editorial from something called The Official News and PR Delivery Service asserts that CIA Director George Tenet should resign. Based, in part, on a Bob Woodward novel:
The book, which is due out on Monday, also claims that CIA director George Tenet (shown here), personally assured the president that weapons of mass destruction existed.

Bush, it is claimed said: "I've been told all this intelligence about having WMD and this is the best we've got?"

To which Tenet reassured Bush: "Don't worry, it's a slam-dunk case."

If true, then Tenet should resign and finally accept responsibility for his mistakes. After all, it's a slam-dunk case.

Woodward's book supports testimony by former White House counterterrorism adviser Richard Clarke that the Bush administration was focused on Iraq instead of Afghanistan after September 11, if not before.
From what I've read, Woodward's book does not such thing. And it's a non-sequitur that Tenet should resign because of bad intelligence. That being said, if Woodward heard that conversation, which he did not, the President should long ago have asked for Tenet's resignation for bad advice.

Basing any demand on assertions by Woodward and Clarke is foolish. No matter how reliable they may or may not be on various points, taken as wholes, neither man is entirely credible. One must not base a rash statement on rash charges. Let saner and more credible evidence be heard before taking swings.

0 comments
 

How 9-11 Could have been Prevented


The 9-11 Commission evidently thinks that 9-11 could have been prevented if someone had thoroughly publicized the arrest of Zacarias Moussaoui
A report on the case released this week noted that "publicity about the threat" posed by Moussaoui "might have disrupted the plot." Commission Chairman Thomas H. Kean (R) said the conclusion is based in part on extensive psychological profiles of the Sept. 11 hijackers, who were "very careful and very jumpy."

"Everything had to go right for them," Kean said. "Had they felt that one of them had been discovered, there is evidence it would have been delayed."
The delay caused be a massive media blitz concerning Moussaoui is part one of what could have prevented 9-11. Also, the FBI, the CIA, and the British and French intelligence services would have had to work together to find Moussaoui's al Qaeda ties and to the German terror cell which planned the actual attack.

That's a massive long shot, guys. Try again.

0 comments
 

What Bob Shrum Must Do


The Boston Globe today acknowledges that Bob Shrum runs the JF Kerry campaign. Yeah, yeah, we went through that in this space when he gave Jim Margolis the boot a few weeks ago.

Mary Beth Cahill runs the day-to-day stuff while Shrum is the grand architect, so we've got Teddy Kennedy's people running the show. "I'm a Centrist!" can shriek the candidate, but that's not his record and won't be his message.

Shrum's going to dig up the first President elected from the Democratic Party, General Andy Jackson, and run another "The People vrs. The Powerful" thing: "Corporate America sucks." He did the same for Al Gore in 2000.

John Kerry is no Andrew Jackson.

It's going to require a heck of a lot more than that to defeat a sitting President, especially one with President Bush's human characteristics. Bush has the potential to play as well with union members as did President Reagan in 1984.

As Kerry's chief strategist, though, here is what Shrum should do. He has to get together with the major fundraisers and power brokers within the Democrat Party, get with DNC people like John Sasso and the titular Terence McAuliffe and root through party bylaws and code. They need a brokered convention, by hook or by other hook, and a different candidate.

They need Bobby Kennedy. If Shrum can channel Andy Jackson, then why not Bobby?
0 comments
 

What we learned last night


First and foremost, I think last night established that Tim Wakefield is still a darn good pitcher, not arguably washed up like Pedro. The Sox have assembled a pretty good team this year, which does not excuse Johnny Damon's belief in his physical self as the next Jim Morrisson.

Javier Vasquez was not pitching in Montreal last night; he was pitching in Fenway Park against the Red Sox. He settled down after a while, but unfortunately, the tone of the game was set in the first inning. (The Yanks are as much to blame for that as their pitcher.) Another downside to Vasquez is that we traded Nick Johnson to get him. That leaves us weak at 1B, where Jason did not have a perfect night. Is Travis Lee, when healthy, the answer? Nah. Only Allen Iverson, when healthy, is The Answer, and that's on the hardwood, not on a diamond.

The offense reminded me of the WS vrs. the Marlins, with Posada taking the Giambi Game 6 role. It's nice to have a catcher with pop, but where was everyone else.

It's early. Mussina vrs. Schilling this afternoon. Moose is having a mixed year so far, and there was a time when the Yanks could not hit Schilling. These are different Yankees, and this is a different Schilling.

0 comments
 

Camel Spider


Tech Sgt. Greg Heuston, stationed at the Ali al Salem Air Base in Kuwait, is a childhood friend and a Desert Storm vet. He sends along this photograph of a Camel Spider, with the note: "These are the biggest I have seen yet, and they are still the fastest critters I have ever seen running on 8 legs."



We could deliver a truckload to Boston this summer...

0 comments

4/16/2004

 

Osama bin Laden, JF Kerry, and Halliburton


On Thursday, we learned of a tape from Osama bin Laden on which he said:
This war makes millions of dollars for big corporations, either weapons manufacturers or those working in the reconstruction [of Iraq], such as Halliburton and its sister companies...
This is from Greg Pierce's "Inside Politics," from the April 13th Washington Times:
Kerry vs. Halliburton


"John Kerry loves to vilify Halliburton," James Taranto writes in his Best of the Web Today column at www.OpinionJournal.com.

"In a December 2003 press release, the candidate blasted the company over an alleged fuel overcharge, which remains under investigation by the Pentagon. Kerry waxed indignant about how the $61 million Halliburton putatively overcharged could have been used to buy 40,000 sets of body armor for soldiers — this two months after he voted against funding the war and reconstruction efforts," Mr. Taranto said.

One thing Mr. Kerry does not mention is "the risks that these contractors are taking to help stabilize and reconstruct Iraq."
On BlogsforBush today, David Moore posts the OBL quote and this Kerry ad from Salon.com:



Cute, John-John F. Kerry.

Rush Limbaugh posted a transcript of his radio show on his site, in which he said:
RUSH LIMBAUGH: [I]t's going to make it harder and harder for them to rip Halliburton, Halliburton people are giving their lives here, but just as an example here's John Kerry echoing the bin Laden statement that Halliburton is evil.

KERRY: Those aren't Exxon prices, those are Halliburton prices.

RUSH: All right, so we've got Osama bin Laden, the terrorist leader of the world, echoing the sentiments expressed by the Democratic Party's presumed presidential candidate.
It's simple. Bin Laden wants to damage the President in the eyes of the American people, undermining the war on terrorism. Naturally, he'd borrow lines from Kerry. They will each say anything to harm the President's chances to be reelected.

This does not equate Kerry and bin Laden, by any stretch; rather, they can trade lines and hope for a Kerry victory.

0 comments
 

9-11 Commissioners Defend Gorelick


The call is in for Jamie Gorelick, erstwhile assistant to Clinton A.G. Janet Reno. Her fellow commissioners defend her as "one of the really savvy, nonpartisan of the bipartisan members," "one of the finest members of the commission," and "a valuable member." To underscore the cordial nature of the commission, at least in private where they should have stayed, Gorelick last week referred to fellow Commissioner John Lehman as "Brother Lehman."

In defending her, none of them addressed her clear conflict of interest.

Boston 2 - New York 0. It's still very early.

0 comments
 

John Kerry's Mind, "unmade up" and unkempt



For RNCResearch:


SEN. JOHN KERRY (D-MA) TODAY [Thursday]: "I'm tired of Karl Rove and Dick Cheney, who went out of their way to avoid chance to serve ... I'm not going to listen to them talk to me about patriotism ... See that great stars and stripes? I fought under that flag and I've seen it draped over coffins of friends ... The political bombs may be bursting in air today as they try to distort the truth. But as I look up that flag is still there ..." (ABCNews.com's "Noted Now," Accessed 4/16/04)


JOHN KERRY IN 1992: "The race for the White House should be about leadership, and leadership requires that one help heal the wounds of Vietnam, not reopen them ... We do not need to divide America over who served and how. I have personally always believed that many served in many different ways. ... Are we now to descend, like latter-day Spiro Agnews, and play, as he did, to the worst instincts of divisiveness and reaction that still haunt America? Are we now going to create a new scarlet letter in the context of Vietnam? ... But while those who served are owed special recognition, that recognition should not come at the expense of others; nor does it require that others be victimized or criticized or said to have settled for a lesser standard. ... We do not need more division. We certainly do not need something as complex and emotional as Vietnam reduced to simple campaign rhetoric." (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 2/27/92, p. S2479)


My observation: John Kerry sounded so high-minded and deeply principled in 1992, as if he had finished thoroughly examining nuances and come to the conclusion that insults and painful division at the expense of others as "simple campaign rhetoric" was hurtful and harmful.

He supported his candidate, Bill Clinton, and he was putting his war hero credibility behind the draft evader. The statement was almost presidential.

Now, he's campaigning for President as the ultimate null. He's not anything. And this is what he has to do.

0 comments
 

Plan of Attack


Bob Woodward -- a man who has invented more people than JF Kerry and fictionalized more events than Jayson Blair, with "journalistic license" -- has a new book, Plan of Attack, in which he asserts that the Bush Administration drew up a secret plan to invade Iraq less than two months after we invaded Afghanistan, and that he was afraid to tell anyone because there would be a major fit thrown.
"I knew what would happen if people thought we were developing a potential war plan for Iraq," Bush is quoted as telling Woodward. "It was such a high-stakes moment and ... it would look like that I was anxious to go to war. And I'm not anxious to go to war."

Bush and his aides have denied accusations they were preoccupied with Iraq at the cost of paying attention to the al Qaeda terrorist threat before the September 11, 2001, attacks.
Going by the best intelligence on Saddam Hussein and Iraq, the President, the United States Congress, and half the world save Saddam's contractors in France and Russia, held that Saddam was a danger with which the world had to deal. If the President did not prepare for such an eventuality, he would have been derelict in his duties.

I remember claims from Wes Clark that the Bush Administration had drawn up plans to invade Iraq shortly after taking office.

The press is acting as if it were an event which triggered the war against Saddam Hussein, and that the President was planning to invade even before that event. This was not the case. The President would have squelched the danger in Iraq even sooner if he had chosen to attempt it unilaterally from the start; instead, he spent about six months trying to achieve an international consensus.

More book selling. Joe Wilson's tell-all novel is due next month.

0 comments
 

Jessie Ventura 4 Prez


As you've no doubt heard, former Minnesota Governor Jesse "The Body" Ventura is tweaking the media by suggesting a possible Presidential run in 2008. That's what he tells the Associated Press.
"No party, no nothing," he told the news service, adding that his campaign message would be, "Elect someone who truly is not controlled by special-interest money. With me, you would get a true check and balance."
It's time for someone to ask Donald Trump. Dustin Hoffman. Hillary Clinton.

None of these people will be President, but they make the media hum. (And this is why I've linked to Weekly World News.)

0 comments
 

An admission from Teresa Heinz


John Kerry's wife met and spoke with New York Post gossip columnist Cindy Adams.
"I do my own hair. I washed it myself yesterday. Problem is, in the rain it gets curly. In humidity, it frizzes. As for the dining, some small hotels don't even serve after 10 o'clock. I've already gained 10 pounds from the quick snacks and junk food. My husband doesn't gain because he can go without eating. I can't. I get fuzzy-headed. I discovered you usually can get salad, so for a while it was always chicken Caesar until I had it twice in one day and then it was no, no, can't do that again. I'm thinking of getting a cooler because at least there's juices and good yogurt.

"They call me the Scarf Lady. I never wore scarves before. But throw a red scarf onto a black suit and it's a lift. Change scarves and the outfits change. And dress in layers. Who knows whether you'll be hot or cold."
The woman not only doesn't bake cookies -- there's the help for that sort of thing -- she would also sooner discuss being "fuzzy-headed" than ramble about fuzzy-headed half-concepts like the "politics of meaning."

Plus, she calls her Armani pantsuit, "My Mao suit."

0 comments
 

Parental Notification and Rape


Florida State Senator Larcenia Bullard broke ranks with her fellow Democrats, Thursday, and supported a Republican-sponsored amendment to the State constitution requiring teenaged girls to notify a parent having an abortion performed.
But Bullard said her party had it wrong -- and that she was uniquely qualified to say that because her mother helped her through the tough times.

''I am a victim,'' Bullard said, quieting the room.

``I want you to know that I have something to say and that is to share that I am a victim. I draw my strength from being a victim. Because at the end of the day, the only way I could bring closure to being that victim was to talk to who? My mother -- and eventually forgive my father.''
The Miami Herald berates Mrs. Bullard as having a reputation for "rambling and sometimes eliciting snickers from her colleagues," and the proposal failed, but her story is worth the read. [link]

0 comments
 

Kerry invents more people


Last month, candidate JF Kerry told us that he had "met with more leaders who can't go out and say this publicly. But boy, they look at you and say: 'You've got to win this. You've got to beat this guy. We need a new policy.' Things like that." Who were these world leaders with whom Kerry met? Kerry didn't say, and the reporter's later "correction" was naught be unsubstantiated politicking.

On Thursday, Kerry told a $25,000/plate "21" Club luncheon in Manhattan, "There are so many Republicans who have said to me: `You know, for the first time in my life, I'm going to vote for a Democrat. I'm ready to switch over.' "

Who are these Republicans, and do they exist? Since there are "so many" of them…

I think it's safe to say that Kerry invented them to make a point. That point, of course, is that he is really a fiscal conservative. That's what his new ads are going to claim.

Speaking of the $25,000/plate Kerry luncheon, a Kerry spokesman last month had an interesting response toremarks made by the President's father:
Kerry spokesman Bill Burton said it probably was easy for Bush to say at the $100 a plate luncheon that the economy was doing well, "but if you talk the three million who've lost their jobs since George Bush became president I think they'd probably have a different view. President Bush and his son are both good people who did a bad job with the American economy."
I then observed that Kerry was tricking the "three million who've lost their jobs" into maxing out their credit cards on his web site.

Pretty soon, the candidate will be inventing entire villages. It takes an invented village to raise Kerry's favorable rating.

0 comments
 

Alaska conservative takes on Murkowski


After Republican Frank Murkowski left the U.S. Senate to become governor of Alaska, he appointed his daughter Lisa to fill the remainder of his Senate term. The election for a full term is this November, and conservative Mike Miller, until recently Governor Murkowski's administration commissioner, is challenging Lisa in the State's June 1 open GOP primary. The winner will take on the Democrat candidate, former Governor Tony Knowles.
"Both are liberals, so the only issue would be nepotism - and Lisa Murkowski loses to Tony Knowles," he said. "In a race with Mike Miller, Tony Knowles would have to talk about issues."
Knowles will be tough competition for either prospective Republican nominee, and the Democrats surely sense a good chance for a pickup in Alaska to help offset GOP gains expected elsewhere.

0 comments
 

The WMD Hearings


The 9-11 Commission is nearing the end of its investigation, and some folks -- including Dick Myers, Editoral Director of CBSNews.com -- are becoming aroused at the thought of the Robb-Silberman Commission (WMD Commission) beginning its work. No kidding.

By Executive Order in February, the President created the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction.

The stated purpose:
The Commission shall assess whether the Intelligence Community is sufficiently authorized, organized, equipped, trained, and resourced to identify and warn in a timely manner of, and to support United States Government efforts to respond to, the development and transfer of knowledge, expertise, technologies, materials, and resources associated with the proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, related means of delivery, and other related threats of the 21st Century and their employment by foreign powers (including terrorists, terrorist organizations, and private networks, or other entities or individuals).
Will this be politicized? Of course. CBS's Myers wants the WMD Commission hearings to begin forthwith for political reasons; to wit:
If voters are going to be able to make an informed choice in November, the presidential commission on pre-war intelligence headed by former Senator Charles Robb and federal Judge Laurence Silberman must hold public hearings before the election. The 9/11 hearings that just finished have convinced me of that.
It is the public hearings of the 9-11 Commission, I assume, which have been the most partisan and useless. Likewise, public WMD Commission hearings would be another annoying game of political GOTCHA.

Myers has an even grander circus in mind. He wants the WMD Commission, meeting in public, not only to look for witches in the area of pre-war WMD intelligence; he wants the commission to "assess the whole palette of pre-war intelligence."

This is serious stuff. Let the WMD Commission conduct their business away from the gabby circuit and issue a report. It's that with which the 9-11 Commission should have stuck.

0 comments
 

Director of Intelligence


Good morning. The New York Times reports this morning that the Scowcroft Commission, chaired by Brent, recommended last year, and the White House is considering, a plan to place operation of the nation's 15 intelligence agencies under the direction of a one individual. Also under consideration is the creation within the FBI of a director of domestic intelligence,

These two moves would make the findings of the 9-11 Commission largely irrelevant and would eliminate consideration of a separate domestic spy organization.

The individual agencies would become jealous of turf, but that should be irrelevant. If this is likely to solve the problems of a helter-skelter intelligence conglomeration, then it naturally should be done.

Who to run such an agency? I don't suppose John Poindexter would be acceptable.

0 comments

4/15/2004

 

New Column on the RSN site


The latest column by Justin Darr, September 11, 2001: Surprise! Al-Qaeda Did It!, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site.
If you have spent any time over the last few months reading about the 9/11 Commission, one thing should be readily apparent: America is to blame. Forget the notion that the Commission's goal is to help prevent another 9/11 from every happening again. Laugh away the idea that the Commission wants to objectively look at the intelligence failures that made the attack possible. And, do not even entertain the thought that reality might interject its ugly face into their deliberations. The 9/11 Commission is proving that it would rather be a sound bite factory for the media, where Democrats and Republicans take turns demonizing the other for allowing 9/11 to occur, rather than acknowledging the truth. Neither the Clinton nor the Bush Administrations are to blame for 9/11. [MORE]


0 comments
 

Larry Sabato rules out Ms. Rodham


Not really. It seems some media type asked Larry S. about Hillary Rodham. He answered:
Political analyst Larry Sabato on Sen. Hillary Clinton as a Kerry running mate: “She'd make the blue states bluer and the red states redder. She's a polarizer.”
My own analysis? Not even the Dems want her. She's fine, they say, as a U.S. Senator from New York, but keep her away from the White House.

Surely Kerry's people know that the Anti-Bush crowed is one thing…

0 comments
 

Terrorists love fear…


[HT, Erich at Confessions of a Political Junkie]

From Reuters:
Fabrizio Quattrocchi, one of four Italian security guards abducted earlier this week, was shot to death Wednesday after Italy refused to bow to the kidnappers' demands that it withdraw its troops from Iraq.

Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said a video recording of the killing showed that Quattrocchi was hooded when his kidnappers put a gun to his head.

"When the murderers were pointing a pistol at him, this man tried to take off his hood and shouted: 'Now I'm going to show you how an Italian dies'. And they killed him," Frattini said.

"He died a hero," he added.
Sig. Quattrocchi won a battle for civilization. His lone act of bravery outdoes scores of cowards, from Kennedy to Chirac.

0 comments
 

The $%@& President won't Apologize



[I posted this one on Watchblog earlier.]

A New York Times' writer notes, in what looks like an Op/Ed in effete costume Thursday morning, that President Bushwould not apologize at his press conference. The assembled correspondents offered him, gift wrapped, no fewer than five (5) opportunities to do so.

J.F.K., after all, apologized for the Bay of Pigs in 1961, called a special press conference to take that heat: "There is an old saying, that victory has a hundred fathers and defeat is an opinion. I'm the responsible officer of the government." Kennedy's polls, history records, shot through the roof. Shouldn't then President Bush apologize for September 11? After all, it provided a boost against candidate JF Kerry.

Theatrics! Hey, it worked to sell Dick Clarke's novel. However, the American people should expect their President to be sincere, and President Bush has nothing for which to apologize. He seemed to legitimately struggle Tuesday evening when trying to think of something he would have done differently. He will not force upon himself the blame for something for which he does not think himself responsible.

The Bay of Pigs was a U.S. action, a scheme to liberate Cuba concocted by the administration of President Eisenhower. Why then was President Kennedy responsible for what happened? He was responsible for the execution of the plan: the personnel, the support, the timing, etc. For whatever reasons, it failed to liberate Cuba -- and Kennedy admitted this.

The attacks on America were an action of an international entity, al Qaeda. The President could have staged an apology for not having prevented it, but he could not have thwarted it. It is admirable that the press so wants him to score political points with a disingenuous confession, but this is not in keeping with his view of the presidency.

The Kansas City Star joins in the demand for faux-contrition:
The president acts as if he is being asked to apologize for the terrorist attacks themselves, which is untrue. The attacks were the work of the al-Qaida terrorist network. But it would be reasonable for the president to apologize to the public for the many government failures that left the country far more vulnerable to its enemies than it should have been.

And an apology for the administration's shrill but mistaken assumptions about Iraqi weapons should have been tendered to the public, Congress and the international community a long time ago.
[The editorial can also be read here, on the KRT wire, beneath the Miami Herald editorial.]

In the course of the editorial, the paper opined that the President "fumble[d] questions about past mistakes," was guilty of "confusion, ignorance and buck-passing" and "finger-pointing about the previous administration's mistakes," was behaving "like a schoolboy caught off-guard by a tough question from the teacher," was acting "flustered" and "shrill," and leaving the "impression of extraordinary personal rigidity."

But they are projecting. Witness their offhand reasons why they believe the President should apologize for not doing things differently in Iraq:
- Bush could have demanded better intelligence on Iraqi weapons programs -- or presented the American public and the international community with more realistic appraisals of the uncertain information that was available.
The Administration and the intelligence services, and people from Paul Bremer to Colin Powell, have said repeatedly that they used the "best intelligence available.
- The president should not have issued his premature declaration of victory last year.
He never declared victory. His words aboard the U.S.S. Lincoln were: "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended." They had. Many in the press have been all-too-willing to perpetuate a lie about what was actually said.
- Bush could have done a better job of determining how many troops were needed in Iraq. The current numbers are clearly insufficient.
They are insufficient at least from a journalistic point of view, but have these journalists considered what difference the addition of troops would make? The President filled the military's requests.
- To avoid obvious repercussions in the Islamic world and even in Europe, the president could refrain from citing religious motivations, as he did again on Tuesday, for American actions abroad.
The motivations, however, are religious. The civilized Islamic world knows this as well as does the President. The President cannot stick his head in the sand and pretend things are what they are not, and vice-versa.

This is not the press' finest hour.

Motivation. What do these people think would happen if the President were to apologize, regardless of whether or not he should? Damage. If he apologizes, he loses the backbone of his campaign. A man cannot run for President on a platform of: "I screwed up. Give me another chance." (Jimmy Carter tried this, to an extent, but he was steamrolled in 1980.)

"He's too smug." They want to see the man sweat. It is said that Bill Clinton has privately wished that he had been President on September 11, and that his supporters lament that he "missed his chance for greatness." Perhaps so. Why, then, should Bush have the chance for greatness that was by right Clinton's? (That statement is loaded.)

And this is why President Bush should apologize. Fate gave him President Clinton's opportunity for a genuine legacy. Furthermore, he is handling it nothing like President Clinton would have. Damn him.

Presidential class envy.

0 comments
 

How to lose a war


Kerry press release:
''Secretary Rumsfeld's comment that 'people are fungible' is further indication of this Administration's continuing disregard for the men and women who put their lives on the line every day in Iraq. Secretary Rumsfeld has it wrong. Troops are not chess pieces to be moved on a board, they are real people with families and loved ones who depend on them. From failing to provide our troops with adequate body and vehicle armor to breaking their commitment not to extend assignments beyond one year, this Administration has continually let them down. They deserve more than cold impersonal calculations when their tours are extended, they deserve compassion and understanding of the sacrifice they and their families are making for their country.
A soldier can kill. A soldier can be killed. It is a special employment, and it must not be considered, for the purposes of winning a war, with the terms used for civilians in peacetime.

Mr. Kerry voted not to fund those troops, thus denying them the rights of soldiers.

He is unfit to be Commander in Chief.

0 comments
 

The Race for the Dem Nomination


Lest we forget, the Democrats do not yet have a nominee. The contest is still wide open, in a sense, until their convention in July.

Our friend Hieronymous Bosch received this in his Inbox this afternoon from the Kucinich campaign:
TRANSCRIPT OF AUDIO POSTCARD:

Hi, this is Patch Adams, and I am thrilled to be putting up another postcard for Dennis Kucinich. I've had the wonderful opportunity this year to go around the country and not so much speak for Dennis, but for what Dennis represents.

I never did this before. The idea that a candidate runs on the peace ticket, and getting out of the WTO and NAFTA, and is for Universal Coverage Single Payer health care, and to really try to derail the vulgar greed and power-hungry corporate world.

I'm there for Dennis in every way, and I entreat anyone who wants a country by the people, for the people and of the people to vote for Dennis.
Adams is a doctor/entertainer who was portrayed by Robin Williams in a movie.

Watch your back, I guess, Kerry.

0 comments
 

Air Franken Radio


The Air American radio thing, the Al Franken alternative to right wing hate radio, etc., was dumped from the Chicago and Los Angeles markets
Arthur Liu of Multicultural Broadcasting, owner of network affiliates WNTD/950 AM in Chicago and KBLA/1580 AM in Santa Monica, put Spanish-language broadcasts on those stations Wednesday because, he said, Air America had bounced a check and owed him more than $1 million.
Air Franken attorney David Goodfriend countered that he had stopped payment on the checks for other reasons. He said that they were not going to be bullied, and he's suing to be put back on their air.
"They've been saying, 'We're going to get you the money' for the past two months," Liu said, referring to a security deposit that he said Air America was supposed to have prepaid in advance of its launch. "They're not honoring our agreement."
Meanwhile, in an entry on the blog for their Majority Report radio show (the one with ditzy but cute Janeane Garofalo), someone writes:
One last note. Worry not about the Drudge lies re: checks bouncing. The extra week's worth of publicity will help the station in both the short and long run. Further, unless AAR goes out of business for lack of funds (which we won't), these reports by all these "news" sources will end up being another example of how corrupted and unreliable these sources are.
They have sixteen affiliates, which is not bad for two weeks. And with billionaire George Soros on their side, they do not need an audience.

If you want to listen to their network live, you'll doubtless have to do so from their web site.

I think Jeanine looks perky as a blonde!

0 comments
 

Kerry promises to Define Himself


Next week, Kerry's going to define himself with television ads, he told a group of wealthy donors today.
"A lot of people don't really know who I am," Kerry said at a breakfast where he raised $2.5 million. "The level of communication we need to establish here is enormous."

Kerry has raised nearly $15 million this week. While he lags far behind the nearly $200 million President Bush has raised, the Massachusetts senator said he has managed to avoid allowing the president to use that financial edge to define him.
He will define himself as what, and can he dance to it?

This will be more a feat than a task.

On a side note, the WashPost piece also reports that Kerry will be meeting with the Archbishop of DC, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick. On Fox News Sunday, Cardinal McCarrick expressed a desire to get to know Kerry in order to better understand the candidate's pro-abortion views.

0 comments
 

Another New Column on RSN site


The latest column by Dennis Campbell, Blame for 911 goes back many years, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site:
Much of the folderol associated with the 911 Commission hearings involves assigning blame for the attack on the World Trade Center September 11, 2001.

The Democrats want to blame President George W. Bush, maintaining that what transpired in the eight months he had been in office was more significant than what transpired – or did not – in the eight years of the prior Clinton administration. [MORE]
And if you are interesting in penning an Op/Ed column for the Rightsided Newsletter site, drop me a line.
0 comments
 

New Column on RSN site


The new column by Isaiah Z. Sterrett, The Gift of the Wild-Eyed, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site:
LIBERALS playing the foreign policy blame-game is an irony worthy of O. Henry. It should top the list of absurd inconsistencies, right along with weeping clowns and fire stations engulfed in flames.

But that's what the Party of No Ideas is doing. They're pointing they're blood-stained fingers at Republicans in an effort to discredit Condoleezza Rice, defeat President Bush, and lose the War on Terrorism to radical heathens. [MORE]

0 comments
 

Is JF Kerry Clinton or Gore?


I happened to catch the following headline on Mark Halperin's The Note on Abcnews.com: "Is John Kerry Bill Clinton or Al Gore?" The answer, of course, is neither: Kerry isn't anything. But I was curious, so I read the beginning of the column.

The premise is, I think: If JF Kerry defeats President Bush despite being a "waffler who is weak on defense and an inveterate tax raiser," then he is Bill Clinton. If he loses, he is Al Gore. But again, the answer is neither.

The 1992 election was not about waffling, weak on defense. "It's the economy, stupid." That's the only issue which could resonate with Americans and Clinton put it front and center. Kerry lacks the skills to do this. Period.

The 2000 election was not about any real issue. It was a referendum on the previous eight years, and all the stuff and fiddlesticks concomitant, and Al Gore lacked the skills to change this. Period.

In 2004, the election is about America's security and her place in the world. John Kerry is portrayed as weak on defense and very concerned about France's place in the world. Does John Kerry have the skill to change this? Even if he does, he is not Bill Clinton. If he does not, as should be obvious, he is not Al Gore. The press like to simplify notions so that they can understand them. If something can be equated with a quantified essent, then the sum is known. They know Clinton '92 and Gore '00, so Kerry has to be one of them.

The formula doesn't work. Kerry's got his own course to sail, sink, or swim. He does have some enticing opportunities, but it remains to be seen if he can conjure the conditions to exploit them.

For my part, I still think candidate Kerry is the ultimate null, unfit to conduct this campaign.

0 comments
 

Dodd Apologizes


Two weeks ago, Senator Chris Dodd (D-Connecticut) gave a speech on the Senate floor in tribute to the aging Senator Robert Byrd (D-West Virginia) for his 17,000th Senate vote; he said that Byrd could have founded the nation, written the Constitution, etc.
"He would have been in the leadership crafting this Constitution," he said. "He would have been right at the great moments of international threat we faced in the 20th century."
Those are the words of exaggerated flattery one would expect at a tribute for a doddering, old man. But Dodd wasn't done:
"You would have been right at the founding of this country, right during the Civil War," Dodd continued.
Byrd was a poobah in the West Virginia KKK, a racist. Byrd would have fought for the South.

If Byrd would have helped to draft the Constitution, it is probably that he would have fought for the "rights" of citizens of the United States who traffic in human slavery.

Forget what happened to Trent Lott in a similar circumstance, what Dodd said was reprehensible. And he's sort of sorry:
Dodd said Wednesday he is sorry if anyone was offended by his comments during the April 1 tribute of Byrd after the West Virginia senator cast his 17,000th vote.

"Words can sting and hurt," Dodd told The Associated Press Wednesday. "If in any way, in my referencing the Civil War, I offended anyone, I apologize."
He did not retract his statement. He believes a man who has held racist views should have been in a position of authority at times critical in this country to the equal protection of the laws.

The Senior Senator from Connecticut should volunteer for a course in racial tolerance. He should appear on B.E.T. apologizing for his thoughtless remarks and vowing to consider the effects of racial intolerance of our society today.

Bringing Lott into this, this society should impose the same standards on all men. That is a cornerstone of equality. Dodd should willingly set an example. Do it, Cristobal.

0 comments
 

Kerry playing the wrong card


A Los Angeles Times piece posits that by calling the President a liar, candidate JF Kerry invites "scrutiny of his reputation for vacillation and seemingly contradictory stands."

It seems to me that Kerry is asserting that, as low politics would have it, the best defense is a good offense. His strategists believe that by labeling Bush as untruthful, he shields himself to an extent from such charges.

The paper talked to two Republican strategists, Matthew Dowd and Mr. Anonymous-Criticize-the-President, who is not keen on how the Bush is handling Iraq, and the ubiquitous Stu Rothenberg. The unknown strategist exclaimed:
It's one thing to accuse Bush of playing fast and loose and another to be seen as a viable alternative," the strategist said. "It's two steps, not just one."
Kerry's alternatives on Iraq sound like President Bush's policies with an added dash of U.N.-centric talk.

It is getting close to the time at which Kerry is going to have to have someone smarter than he is come up with a set of concrete policy position and plans, and memorize them and repeat them as his own. Here's the tricky part: Kerry must not waver on these policy positions given to him.

If he does not do this soon, he'll need something unthinkable to win this election.

0 comments

4/14/2004

 

Keep the U.N. out of Iraq


In an era sans the Soviets, a worlds, aside from its lone superpower, has only the United Nations on which to count for what they seem to legitimately fear is a United States governed by a rogue cowboy, stomping other countries beneath its huge, multiple-warheaded feet.

The United Nations thus can give the "gloss of legitimacy" to U.S. endeavors, even if the U.N. lacks legitimacy in its on right.

Michael Rubin just spent over a year in Iraq, most recently advising the Coalition Provisional Authority. He argues in NRO that a U.N. role in Iraq will hamper our efforts in several ways. (Read his piece for the details.)

One paragraph caught my eye. He is writing about the dichotomy between what the world wants (United Nations ruling the United States) and what the Iraqis want.
During the Saddam Hussein's near quarter century in power, the Iraqi government used its media monopoly to shape public opinion. Iraqis saw only what Saddam wanted them to see and heard only what the Iraqi government wanted them to hear. Etched into ordinary Iraqis' perceptions of the United Nations were comments Secretary-General Kofi Annan made at a February 24, 1998, press conference. "Can I trust Saddam Hussein? I think I can do business with him," Annan stated. Iraqi television repeatedly rebroadcast this clip, framed as an implicit endorsement of the Iraqi leader.
Of U.N. envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, who is making littler and less sense these days, he argues: "Perhaps Brahimi is welcome in New York or Kabul, but he is not in Baghdad."

The United Nations is again proving itself to be several layers beneath counterproductive.

0 comments
 

They still don't like Clinton


Counterlibe, Inc. of Washington, DC has received tax-exempt status from the IRS, which will assist the group in raising money to counter the $160-million Bill Clinton Memorial Museum and Amusement Park in Little Rock. The group is looking to build two museums -- one in Little Rock and one in DC -- to counter the Clinton "propaganda" coming out of his museum.

The Associated Press article is a piece of work.
But the tax-exempt status means that [founder Dean] Erickson and co-founder John LeBoutillier, former Republican congressman from New York, will not be able to keep names of contributors or land acquisitions secret for long. Counterlibe Corp. will have to file that and other information with the IRS next year.

Erickson said his organization also needs overt financial and public relations support from prominent Republicans. Erickson already counts on kind words from conservative media personalities like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh and help with documents from insiders including fired Clinton adviser Dick Morris.


0 comments
 

"Choose or Lose" dialogue bubbles


On MTV.com's "Choose or Lose" page, they display a small photograph with words in dialogue bubbles furnished by a site visitor. So it is to be assumed that some young, hip, "totally wow" MTV viewer submits what he or she thinks the candidates pictured are saying in the photo.

I happened by the site this evening. Check it out:



It looks like Kerry has flip-flopped on gay marriage vrs. Domestic Partnership. Groovy.
0 comments
 

Zacarias Moussaoui and The 9-11 Commission


From Reuters today:
Members of the panel this week questioned top FBI, Justice Department and CIA officials over why they failed to capitalize on information they had on Moussaoui before the attacks.

The emerging picture is one in which field agents and others with firsthand suspicions of Moussaoui never connected with higher-ups who might have seen the early outlines of a devastating plot.
And from MSNBC - December 14, 2001:
At the time of his arrest FBI agents found flight manuals for the Boeing 747-400, a flight-simulator computer program, binoculars, two knives, fighting shields and a laptop computer. They later learned that French intelligence officials suspected Moussaoui of involvement with Islamic extremists. The FBI team applied to Washington for a special warrant to go into Moussaoui’s computer but were turned down: as it turned out, a disc contained information about spraying pesticide from a plane. “All I can tell you is that the agents on the scene attempted to follow up aggressively,” FBI director Robert Mueller said this week. “The attorneys back at the FBI determined that there was insufficient probable cause for a [warrant], which appears to be an accurate decision. And September 11 happened.”
The Reuters story lists plenty of evidence on the guy.

Nothing new. What began its public run as the first stop in the Dick Clarke book tour has turned into a grand stage show, funded by the taxpayers. The longer this goes on, the more credibility this panel loses and the more difficult it will be to convince the public that their final product is worth considering.

0 comments
 

Amusements: Kerry's Cabinet


NYTimes columnist Bill Safire has selected a cabinet for a hypothetical President JF Kerry's first term.

Secretary of State - former Clinton U.N. ambassador Dick Holbrooke

Defense Secretary - Senator Chuck Hagel (R-Nebraska)

National Security Advisor - former Senator Gary Hart (D-Utah)

CIA Director - former Senator - former Senator Bob Kerrey (D-Nebraska)

Attorney General - former Detroit Mayor Dennis Archer

Homeland Security - Governor Tom Vilsack (D-Iowa) [NOTE: Safire sees Kerry treating this as a patronage position, as have traditionally been most ambassadorships.]

HHS - former Governor Jeanne Shaheen (D-New Hampshire)

Veterans Affairs - former Senator Max Cleland (D-Georgia)

US Trade Rep. - former Clinton boy Representative Rahm Emmanuel (D-Illinois)

U.N. ambassador - Senator John Edwards (D-North Carolina)

Chief of Staff - former Teddy Kennedy girl Mary Beth Cahill, who runs his coughing-up-blood campaign

And he likes Howard Dean, should Surgeon General open up during Kerry's theoretic first term.


This is amusing, anyway. The only analysis it deserves is: Go Cornhuskers. I wonder why Safire didn't name Representative Tom Osborne (R-Nebraska) as Kerry's stochastic Secretary of Education. (The former Nebraska Cornhuskers coach has a doctorate in educational psychology from… the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.)

0 comments
 

Stand down, Jamie


House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner has joined the growing chorus in calling on former Janet Reno deputy Jamie Gorelick to resign her seat on the 9-11 Commission.
"I believe the commission's work and independence will be fatally damaged by the continued participation of Ms. Gorelick as a commissioner," Sensenbrenner wrote.

"Commissioner Gorelick's memo directing a policy that 'go[es] beyond what is legally required' indicates that her judgment and actions as the deputy attorney general in the Reno Justice Department are very much in question before the commission."
The panel needs to dig up credibility and respect before it releases its final report. As it stands, it is a rated-R joke.

0 comments
 

Onward to Wictory


It's Wictory Wednesday, which is when we talk about how important it is to keep this campaign moving apace. We've seen the battle, and we know it's going to be ugly. We support President Bush.

Click RIGHT HERE to be directed to the page where you can become a Bush Team Leader, an official part of the campaign. You can also join by donating at the campaign's SECURE SERVER.

This effort is undersigned by WW founder PoliBundit and the entire cast of Wictory Wednesday bloggers (page an inch or so to #3).

Let's rock the house.

0 comments
 

The Return (to the news) of Cruz Bustamante


Last August 26, when the weblog was a 10-day-old, I blogged about California Lt. Governor Cruz Bustamante's way to circumvent the campaign law to raise the big money needed to defeat Arnold Schwarzenegger.
California's Fair Political Practices Commission created a loophole by which a candidate can have unlimited contributions to his old campaign committee then roll them over to a new one, thus allowing Bustamante to circumvent the law's $21,200 contribution limit.
Slick, but barely legal.

Not quite. Here's this, today:
Bustamante admitted 44 violations of the voter-approved proposition, which limits individual contributions for candidates for governor to $21,200. He conceded that he improperly raised $3.8 million into an old account with the intention of using it for his governor's race and then, facing criticism, redirected the money into yet another campaign account to pay for ballot measure ads featuring him.
And with that, we conclude today's footnote to the political universe.
0 comments
 

Kerry's Purple Hearts


The Boston Globe reports today that Kerry's "band of brothers" are using the Internet and talk radio to question his service.

Kerry's commanding officer, Lieutenant Commander Grant Hibbard, said that for his first wound, he doesn't even know if the unit took enemy fire. Kerry had a scratch on his arm and held a small piece of shrapnel, and that's that.

Kerry's campaign explained this by saying that it was legit.

But Purple Hearts were evidently given like candy:
"There were an awful lot of Purple Hearts--from shrapnel, some of those might have been M-40 grenades," said George Elliott, who served as a commanding officer to Kerry during another point in his five-month combat tour in Vietnam. (Kerry earlier served a noncombat tour.) "The Purple Hearts were coming down in boxes."
And here's how Kerry got out, according to the paper:
Under Navy regulations, an enlistee or officer wounded three times was permitted to leave Vietnam early, as Kerry did. He received all three purple hearts for relatively minor injuries -- two did not cost him a day of service and one took him out for a day or two.
The Globe piece blames the questions on the bitterness of many veterans over Kerry's anti-war protests. Other veterans, the paper reports, now agree with Kerry's anti-war protests.

This is clearly going to be an issue with some veterans, and it automatically puts an asterisk next to Kerry's "Band of Brothers" rhetoric. If they manage to remove Kerry's service as a campaign tool, his entire strategy is undermined. He cannot run as the military veteran who is thus capable of leading our nation's foreign entanglements.

0 comments
 

Heard at the 9-11 Inquisition


I heard pundit Bill Kristol today speak what I have been saying: Nothing useful can come of the 9-11 Commission's current hearings. What we see is an exercise in partisan entertainment. Hopefully, the 9-11 Commission can do their work on the information they gleaned in private interviews.

The NYC paper Village Voice today published an Op/Ed about the 9-11 Commission becoming partisan. (They fault Attorney General John Ashcroft for yesterday citing Commissioner Jamie Gorelick's memo during the Clinton Administration creating the "wall" between criminal investigations and intelligence agents.

As I called it on the day of Clarke's testimony, the public hearings are "an intense game of high stakes political gotcha." And I have intellectually resolved to treat them as such.


Partisan Democrat Commissioner Roy Roemer today asked CIA Director George Tenet if he had talked to the President in August of 2001. The answer was no, the President was out of town, Tenet was on leave for a time, etc. Roemer faulted the President for not calling Tenet during this time of grave danger, and he asked Tenet if he could have called the President. Tenet's response is informative, re: Dick Clarke's line.

Tenet: "If I wanted to pick up the phone an call the President because 'my hair was on fire,' or whatever, I could have." Clarke had claimed that Tenet was so pumped about the threat and the President's lack of concern that his hair was on fire. Tenet says that this is not the case.


Commissioner Gorelick said to Tenet: "You've had an interesting exchange with Brother Lehman…" She sees the 9-11 Commission as, maybe, a secret society, where the members are referred to as family members. More likely, she sees the commission as being akin to the Supreme Court, where the same parlance has been used.


Something useful might have come out of today's hearing. Tenet noted that the CIA and FBI are often too immediate to the problems to know to correct them, thus they need an outside panel to suggest changes. He added: "The day I retire, I'd be perfect to sit on one of these things, and I'd be happy to do it." It sounds as if he has more to say.

0 comments
 

Dems Seek to Assassinate Rumsfeld


Florida. The St. Petersburg Democratic Club, a partisan organization, took an ad last Friday in the Gulfport Gabber [Associated Press]:
"And then there's Rumsfeld who said of Iraq 'We have our good days and our bad days.' We should put this S.O.B. up against a wall and say 'This is one of our bad days,' and pull the trigger," the ad read under a banner "St. Petersburg Democratic Club."

"Do you want to salvage our country? Be a savior of our country? Then vote for John Kerry and get rid of the whole Bush Bunch!" The ad then directs financial donations to Kerry's campaign headquarters in Washington.
Kerry's campaign expressed outrage and called on the St. Pete Democrat Club to engage in "more productive pursuits." ("Don't just talk about it"?)

0 comments
 

Pay Your Taxes


The federal government has determined that X cents of everything you earn belongs to it. Taxation is theft, but when what you are paying is such a small part of the total, no matter how large or small your payment might be, it doesn't matter. In a more just world, Uncle Sam would have its lips firmly implanted on your posterior for the bill, but this world, this country is imperfect.

The WashPost reports today that President Bush has cut his own taxes by 15-percent; he managed to raise candidate JF Kerry's payment:
The increase in John Kerry's income was almost entirely from capital gains worth $145,805. Those gains came almost exclusively from the March 3 sale of a painting by the Dutch baroque artist Adam Willaerts, which fetched $1.35 million. Kerry's tax payment was $90,575, up from nearly $30,000 last year.
He files separately from Teresa, of course.

My wife and I filed jointly, electronically, and you have until midnight to do so. Do it for Dutch baroque artist Adam Wilaerts, even though he's dead. Death and taxes, indeed.

0 comments

4/13/2004

 

The President's Press Conference


"This been a tough week in that country [Iraq]." And in Washington, so here we go…

From his opening statement, I noted that President Bush is sending Assistant Secretary of State Richard Armitage to talk to Iraq's neighbors, seeking cooperation from them. I do not think it is to shallow to add his name to the list of possible ambassadors to Iraq once the smoke clears, but I suspect he is needed where he is.

"We will finish the work of the fallen."

"Now is the time, and Iraq is the place, when the enemies of the civilized world are testing the will of the civilized world."

That's the script.

The first question was the "quagmire, Vietnam…" thing, and the President replied: "I think that analogy is false." And it sends the wrong message to the troops. He didn't mention that we have already won in Iraq.

He said that on September 11, he was "angry that al Qaeda -- at the time, I thought it was al Qaeda, turns out it was." The first thing out of the White House to the sundry news organizations was Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. Dick Clarke, operating in another zone, claimed that Saddam and Iraq was first faulted.

"This country must go on the offense and stay on the offense." An argument for preemption.

David Gregory of NBC News said that one of the main plaints against the President was that he never admits mistakes The President did not address this in his answer, and he didn't admit a mistake.

Paraphrase from memory and scratches on paper: "I don't want to say I made no mistakes, because I'm confident that I have. I'm just not quick enough to think of one," he said later. He had seemed to struggle mightily, trying to think of a mistake he had made, something he would have done differently.

Skipping ahead, the final question was from NPR's Dan Ganyea, who asked if the President had "failed" to make his case to the American people. The President said that this was what the voters would decide. He'd be disappointed in himself if he changed his opinions based on polls. This is "a conviction that's deep in my soul."

This is confidence, and it also shows that he is not going to admit a mistake for its own sake, or to issue some meaningless theatrical apology, a la Dick Clarke.

When FOX's Jim Angle asked him about the 73 FBI investigations mentioned in the much celebrated August 6 memo, the President noted: "I expect to get valid information…. I can't make good decisions unless I get valid information." No one asked him about the decision to invade Iraq, although he set himself up for it. Of course, he could have answered that intelligence information is of a different nature than objective fact.

He acknowledged that Saddam's WMD "could still be there," hidden some place. Of the people who'd know: "There's a terror still."

Losing his job? "I don't plan on losing my job." He's going to tell the American people that he has a plan to win the war on terror. He thinks the election will come down to who can do best in the war on terror, and who can help create a free Iraq.

"Do we have a duty to lead, or should we shirk responsibility?" That was a nifty way of phrasing Kerry's cries for international decision-making in Iraq: shirking responsibility.

The President was relaxed, confident, and had an aura of honesty. He become flustered, if that's the proper term, only once; again, that was when he seemed to be honestly trying to think of something he would have done differently given the benefit of hindsight.

0 comments
 

Determining Guilt for 9-11


Under the headline Ashcroft blames Clinton, CBS.com opens:
"Attorney General John Ashcroft blamed the Clinton administration for leaving America vulnerable to terrorist attack, testifying Tuesday that the nation was stunned by the Sept. 11 suicide hijackings because "for nearly a decade our government had blinded itself to our enemies."
I don't know that he mentioned Clinton as an individual entity, though he did say that he inherited problems such as underfunding, including for new computers, and some insufficient policy.

Under the headlineSeptember 11 panel slams FBI and Ashcroft, the French wire AFP opens:
The US commission investigating the September 11 attacks criticised FBI readiness to counter strikes on the United States and Attorney General John Ashcroft for not making counterterrorism a top priority.
This was not the case, and I thought his opening statement left them pretty much speechless, in the sense that their attacks were not as pointed as I expected.

Of course, the French hadn't yet seen Ashcroft's testimony or the commission's reaction, as it tells us between the lines in the third paragraph:
The attorney general is expected to face intense questioning when he appears before the commission on Tuesday.
Whatever. The circus continues tomorrow, and I've run out of cotton candy.

As I've pointed out, though, the commission's real product will be based on its work prior to when Dick Clarke testified on behalf of his publisher on my wife's birthday. Perhaps they can compile something useful based on serious work completed before the cages were opened in the zoo. (They have taken private testimony since, so I assume that was mostly serious, though I would not be surprised if its gravity was thrown off kilter by the influence of the nonsense on the commissioners.)

0 comments
 

A Clear and Present Danger


One runs the risk of treating these 9-11 Commission Hearings since Dick Clarke and his book hit the screen as something that they cannot be. This is not an exercise in connecting any dots or discovering a new way of doing things. (This is not an argument about the work of the commission before it went public a few weeks ago.)

Should terrorism be treated as a law enforcement problem or one of national security? Been there, done that. They are two differing strategies, and the former has proven to be an inadequate bandaid. Terrorism must not be treated tactically if the goal is to end it.

Now, if you listen to each question asked today, it is part of the grand game of gotcha. This is happening from both sides. The match moves forward with claims, declassified briefs, intimations, redactions, etc.

If any good is to come of the 9-11 Commission, our hopes must rest on its private activities before Clarke and his book. Everything after has been a pop version of recycled testimony, with some pieces of new material brought along for entertainment purposes only.

John Ashcroft, the attorney general, handled himself well, but we're watching a farce.

0 comments
 

Kerry's Conundrum


John Kerry is not a man behind a movement. He has no base of support. As I wrote early in the primary season, he became the Democrats' frontrunner only because he had won Iowa and New Hampshire, had the best credentials of the group, and seemed inevitable. His inevitability carried him to the nomination, and now the Democrats have him.

ABB is the only game for them.

Witness Howard Dean's words in yesterday's New York Times. He's trying to convince readers not to vote for Ralph Nader:
Voting for Ralph Nader, or for any third-party candidate for president, means a vote for a candidate who has no realistic shot of winning the White House. To underscore the danger of voting for any third-party candidate in elections this close, a statistic from the 2000 campaign may prove useful: a total of eight third-party candidates won more votes than the difference between Al Gore and George Bush nationwide.
Ergo, a vote for Nader is a vote for President Bush. Voting the President from office is the only goal to Dean, and he mentions John Kerry only as many times as he mentions Gore: once.

The Hartford Courant todays takes note:
John Kerry seems to be lost in the argument. Dean tells readers NOT to vote for Nader and that they DON'T want Bush, but he never says who they SHOULD want. In fact Kerry's name is only mentioned once in the column - simply to note who Bush is running against. Bush is mentioned seven times, and Nader is mentioned eight.

Dean's column ends with: "Ralph Nader once said that your best teacher is your last mistake. Too many of us learned the consequences of not standing together four years ago. This November, we can elect a president who fights for average Americans. But we can achieve this goal only if we join together - and don't repeat our last mistake."

And who might that president be?

Beats us.
I can answer the Courant's question: That guy. You know the one. Mr. Ketchup.

0 comments
 

Blair gets What?


The BBC.com analysis piece leads with a statement: "Tony Blair is probably a more popular politician in the US than George Bush is in the UK." That seems probable. Of course, the Brits who are congenitally apt toward childish protest are the same as their genetic brethren in the United States: the unwashed, bitter anti-war crowd. In Britain, they'll protest Bush because he is identifiable with the war and their wild-eyed delusions of American hegemony. In America… whatever.


But Blair is visiting DC:
The dangers [with the British public] are obvious - primarily that some will see the visit as Mr Blair supporting a Republican president against his Democratic challenger, and that he will once again be portrayed as Mr Bush's side-kick.

It is absolutely the case that the Labour Party wants Senator John Kerry to defeat President Bush in November.
The BBC cites a Labour [sic] MP named Oona King as stating that the Prime Minister has to use his influence to get Bush to involve the United Nations more in Iraq and to work on the stalled Middle East peace talks.
So any suggestion at the end of the visit that Tony Blair has used his influence in Washington to encourage a different approach, could well boost the prime minister's standing at home.

The final consideration is that even if this meeting had not already been arranged, the crisis in Iraq would probably have made it essential in any case - no matter how difficult it may be for the prime minister.
It will look good back home, I assume, if Blair can convince Bush of something or other. Maybe the President can take a decision and credit his friend with wielding Churchillian persuasion. It will look good for both men.

0 comments
 

9-11 Commission this Morning


The 9-11 Commission hearings can no longer be considered as objective, fact-finding exercises designed to produce recommendations. The media turned it into GOTCHA, the commissioners fell for the hype, and we could watch the circus this morning on C-SPAN.

Commissioner Richard Ben-Veniste, of the "silver bullet PDB" which wasn't fame, quizzed former FBI director Louis Freeh. He said that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was looking "outward" for threats, as in the Soviet Union, not "inward."

Ben-Veniste is a alpha-partisan, so one could assume he was looking for a specific answer when he asked Freeh: "Was that a failure of the Clinton Administration? Was it a failure of the Bush Administration?" Freeh answered neither, and Ben-Veniste seemed satisfied with this. Perhaps he had fallen off his "Blame Bush/Kerry '04" high horse and was trying to take the high road, trying to illustrate that it was not the fault of a particular administration.

Commissioner Jamie Gorelick, and assistant Clinton A.G. under Janet Reno, recused herself from questioning for that reason. Actually, though, she should be called to testify herself.

Commissioner Bob Kerrey, who repeatedly referred to Condoleezza Rice last week as "Dr. Clarke," promised not to call Freeh, "director Clarke." I'm sure we all had a good chuckle.

I'll have to review a transcript, if one is made available, to see exactly to which meetings he was referring, but Freeh discussed a series of important meetings during the Clinton administration, adding: "Dick Clarke wasn't at any of those meetings." He explained that he did not know why National Security Advisor Sandy Berger did not want Clarke at those meetings.

Remember, Dick Clarke had complained that the Bush people did not utilize his expertise, while he was the most important advisor to the Clinton Administration. And here's Sandy Berger locking the putz out of meetings. This is at variance with Clarke's testimony, but so is reality in general.

Former Clinton A.G. Janet Reno claimed responsibility for the dysfunction of the FBI: "I don't blame anybody. I'm responsible. [I tried to fix it], but I ran out of time." She had eight years! She was front and center for both Clinton terms. She could have trapped the problems, and the terrorists, in a church and set them ablaze. Plenty of time.

But the partisan questioners asked her about her plans having been forgotten -- back to square one -- in the Bush Administration.

Janet Reno expressed "frustration" that the Administration ignored a series of four memos she sent in early 2000 regarding the importance of national security. (One could tell, of course, that her hair had been on fire at the time.)

During the transition to the Bush Administration, she does not recall mentioning al Qaeda to incoming A.G. John Ashcroft. We had been led to believe that the Bush Administration had been inundated with information and warnings, and Reno doesn't recall it at all. Or briefing Ashcroft on al Qaeda cells in the United States.

0 comments
 

Specter's AP Interview


The Associated Press spoke for 75-minutes yesterday with Senator Arlen Specter, who defended himself.
"I am not a flip-flopper," Specter said. "I have voted 8,000 to 9,000 times, and you can find a rare occasion where I may have shifted a position when the terrain has shifted."
Which way blows the wind?

He makes a common argument: "It's very important to the country there be a center of the Republican Party." I agree, if that is what the voters want; better a liberal Republican than a moderate Democrat. The R's next to the names mean something. But there is no metaphysical reason for a sharply divided party.

Maine provides the lefty branch of the Senate GOP in O. Snowe and Susie Collins. (One cannot qualify Linc Chafee, at least so far as I can tell. He's his own noise machine.)

0 comments
 

New Miss USA a Republican


Good morning. Just when looking at Rummy's visage was no longer enough for titillation, the hew Miss USA, Shandi Finnessey [Miss Missouri], is crowned. She is Republican who says that she wants to use her new position to explain US involvement in Iraq. (I want to watch her repeat the name "Karbala" slowly.)



If she were a Democrat and Clinton was President, we could have some fun with it, but we are better off the way things are.

I will make an honest attempt to include her image in every post for now until the election... in 2008.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ADDENDUM: Here is the abstract from Shandi's book, The Furtails:
The Furrtails, a family of rabbits, live in their burrow next to Mr. Villman’s farm. Sammy, is not as quick and smart as his younger brother, and soon finds himself stuck in a cage, unable to get out. Each rabbit must use his or her “special” gifts to help free Sammy from the trap.

This story is intended to teach children that each of us have things that we are really good at and things that we may need help with. One is not better than another, only different. This is what makes us all special and unique.
I'm proud to have Shandi in the party, and my wife will understand why I am putting a framed 12" x 16" of her next to President Reagan.
0 comments

4/12/2004

 

Sadr calling the shots?


Contrary to what I wrote earlier this evening based on what I'd read elsewhere, the New York Times on Tuesday will publish an article saying that Moktada al-Sadr is basically running the show in Iraq.

They have a delegation representing Iraq's most powerful clerics, including Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani's son, meeting with Sadr in Najaf in an attempt to appease him.

The say the "kill or capture" language coming from the Americans is actually a bluff, as Americans are afraid of what will happen if they raid into one of the Shi'ites most holy cities.

The paper has people in Baghdad "locking their doors and planning escape routes" in case Sadr should decide to toy with the Americans by attacking them there.

Other than that, the paper reports calm.

The news is the news, depending on who is reporting it.

0 comments
 

Australia's Exit Strategy


Australia's opposition Labor Party wants an exit strategy for when their troops are to leave Iraq, plus they want out by Christmas.

Read this AAP piece from the Sydney Morning Herald and tell me if it doesn't sound like JF Kerry isn't helping them to deliberate on this nuance versus that universal maybe truth.
0 comments
 

John F. Kerry Today


Eric Lindholm at Viking Pundit tells as that the candidate Kerry made the cover of the latest issue of France Today. He has the graphic.

Eric refers to candidate Kerry as "Senator Splunge." Splunge, of course, means: "[I]t's a great-idea-but-possibly-not-and-I'm-not-being-indecisive!" That's Kerry.

In 1969, Monty Python's Terry Jones spoke the line with great nuance, which might his ramblings about Iraq, published in Britain's Manchester Observer last year.

0 comments
 

Moqtada al-Sadr: Dead or Alive


Perhaps as a testament to the renegade cleric's popularity in Iraq, the end is near for the little mutant punk:
"The mission of the U.S. forces is to kill or capture Moqtada al-Sadr," Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, commander of ground forces in Iraq, said in a video conference from Baghdad with reporters at the Pentagon.
In a country as volatile as is Iraq right not -- not "chaos," reminds General Mark Kimmitt -- this would be insanity. President Bush would again be called a wild cowboy with wanted posters. He might well be anyway, as some folks are painfully wont to do that, but it will be baseless.

On Saturday, I wrote:
I've said it before: Sadr is a punk. He's a little man who got ahead of himself. The real Shi'ite clergy have disavowed him, the Iraqi Governing Council is embarrassed -- all he has are the same militant punks, young and illiterate, who destroy in the name of their god. They can do wonders as Palestinians with bombs strapped to their torsos or sick mutants who fly airplanes into buildings, but not if Allah is taken out of the equation. And he has been.
By removing the religious backing from Sadr, the Shi'ites had removed his leverage.

From the Reuters story linked in the in the first paragraph above:
Gen. John Abizaid, head of Central Command that covers Iraq, on the same video conference said Sadr was being isolated by fellow Shi'ites.

"Moqtada al-Sadr is isolating himself," Abizaid said. "This was not by any stretch of the imagination a Shi'ite uprising."
Thus the open disregard for the punk's life. Capture or kill.

So ends another brilliant career, before he was taken seriously by his would-be peers.

0 comments
 

Gorelick should testify


Partisan 9-11 Commissioner Jamie Gorelick should not be behind the dais grilling those who testify, Ethan Willison argues in today's NRO; rather, the former assistant to Clinton Attorney General Janet Reno should be answering questions.
The questioning can reasonably be expected to focus on steps taken (or not taken) at the Justice Department in the wake of the first World Trade Center attack in 1993 and the 1995 bombing in Oklahoma City — the worst incidents of terrorism inside the United States before the Sept. 11 hijackings. Shouldn't Gorelick provide the commission — and the public — with answers on these topics as well? There is something absurd about the notion that, rather than testifying, Gorelick will instead be asking Reno for information. Are there any questions she can ask to which she does not already have the answer? Gorelick's role with the commission deprives the inquiry of a potentially valuable source of agreement or disagreement with the attorney general's testimony.
What example, what did Gorelick and other of Reno's underlings do about the FBI, which is under the microscope right now for failing to connect various dots?

We hear Chairman Kean, Assistant Chairman Hamilton, and others reassure us that the commission's ultimate produce will be constructive, sensible, and should be taken seriously. I do not think the last suggestion is possible.

0 comments
 

Back on Message


An LATimes piece today reminded me that Karen Hughes will return to the White House payroll in August; and that we needn't hold our breath until then. I sometimes used to think that someone smacked the President upside the head and Hughes appeared. She's that much the air that's clear in the midst of a White House that sometimes seems to trip on its own nuance. (It's not a dirty word if the nuance is legitimate.)

The paper presents the "other opinion":
Laura Flanders, the author of a new book highly critical of the White House, "Bushwomen," contends that the Bush administration is using Hughes and other female appointees to create "a family-friendly facade on an extremist administration … that is seeking to roll back many of the protections and rights that have helped these women advance."
Two questions. Would Ms. Flanders say that to Karen Hughes's face? If so, who'd pick her from the intellectual scrapheap.

Intellect and pretense are not the same thing. Not even close.

Hughes left the post of Counselor to the President for Strategic Planning, Communications, and Speechwriting in 2002. Wrote columnist Cal Thomas at the time:
The loss of Hughes from the White House (she'll still advise President Bush from Texas) removes Bush's top Christian aide from his daily presence. Both Hughes and Bush are serious practitioners of their faith (Hughes and her family church-shopped until settling in at National Presbyterian in Washington). The faith of both influences the way they see the world and policy issues. Most high-profile people in Washington don't get that because most here don't "get" God. Hughes and Bush do and people with sensitive antennae can pick up on that influence in many domestic and foreign policy decisions, especially post-Sept. 11.
From an objective, looking-in standpoint, the President's faith is important to him. There is that, and unlike certain other politicians, President Bush is not one to nullify his faith when engaged in decision-making.

Karen Hughes is smart and effective, a brilliant tailor and conductor of messages. What is most important about her return, though, is that she brings out the best in President Bush professionally. I posit that you could see her return on Sunday at noon, when the President was discussing the memo with reporters.

I am reassured.

0 comments
 

Kerry's Veep


The Washington Times looks at this matter briefly in a piece this morning, saying that Dem leaders are advising him to select "someone who neutralizes his Northeast liberal reputation and doesn't eclipse him in the charm department."That's a tough one. I suppose it wouldn't hurt to ask Al Gore.

Seriously, though, Evan Bayh of Indiana springs to mind. He's not an upstaging kind of guy.
Many Democratic primary voters acknowledged voting for Mr. Kerry with the hope that he'd pick Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina as his running mate.
Oh, maybe they'll come around to supporting Kerry on his own merits. Which are?

Good question.

John McCain told Tim Russert emphatically that he would not take it, noting that the Dems probably weren't going to come to his way of thinking on abortion and national security.

Bayh's got a downside for the Dem nomination, though: He has an anti-abort voting history.

Maybe Kerry will put a fundraiser on his ticket. He could use one.

0 comments
 

New Column on RSN site


The latest column by Judson Cox, Posturing While America Burns, is live on the Rightsided Newsletter web site.
When politicians see television cameras, even the most reasonable and responsible among them become more than willing to sink the ship of our nation with the inflammatory rhetoric spewing from their loose lips. The 9-11 Commission has done nothing to further the prevention of terrorism, but has been a dirty political blame game that must have been very entertaining for Osama bin Laden (assuming he has access to television in the hole he is cowering in). The public hearings have been a dangerous farce, eroding the confidence of some and exposing our divisions to those who wish us ill. [MORE]


0 comments
 

Abortion and Scouting


The American Life League's STOPP International -- an outfit dedicated to enacting a cessation of the pro-abortion activities of Planned Parenthood -- has announced in a press release that their study shows that 26-percent of Girl Scout Councils have connections with Planned Parenthood, and that 79-percent simply won't deny or admit such a relationship.
"Some councils attempted to justify their partnership with Planned Parenthood by having parents sign permission slips," Sedlak explained. "We maintain that, as an organization that purports to provide the best for young girls, it is the Girl Scouts organization itself that should be saying NO to Planned Parenthood. We ask every parent of a Girl Scout in areas served by councils that did not respond to our inquiry to insist the councils tell the truth."

As parents find out about local councils, they can use a link on the web site to send corrections/comments to STOPP, and the site will be updated as new information is received. "It is important to understand," Sedlak said, "we are not at war with the Girl Scouts, but that we are trying to protect young girls from the evils of Planned Parenthood. We are simply asking that Girl Scout councils stop their partnership with Planned Parenthood."
There's nothing per se political about the story, but it makes one wonder… I'll skip the cookies this year.

0 comments
 

The USA, the PRC, and Taiwan


Geopolitics. The quasi-reliable French wire AFP reports today that the People's Republic of China wants the United States to scrap the 25-year-old Taiwan Relations Act, the one which the United States enacted unilaterally to pledge of US defense of Taiwan should the island ever be attacked by the Chinese communists.
"The so-called Taiwan Relations Act, enacted unilaterally by the United States, has infringed on China's sovereignty and interfered in China's internal affairs," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Kong Quan said in a statement on the ministry's website.

"The United States ... should end the implementation of the Taiwan Relations Act and not send the wrong message to 'Taiwan independence' forces, so as not to harm peace across the Taiwan Straits and the steady development of Sino-US relations," said Kong.
The web site for the Chinese wire Xinhua, also quasu-reliable, follows their habit in printed the quotes as the story but without the quotation marks. [that link]

The idea, of course, is the one-China myth, that Taiwan is a part of the PRC. This has been troubling, in that Taiwan is an independent nation everywhere but on paper. Nations will deal with Taiwan, but not officially. Taiwan has its own government, everyone realizes this, but we can't come out and say that we see the obvious.

The Taiwan Relations Act has been a crack in that farce which has, ironically, served to extenuate the spoof.

If the President were to drop the act, he would be conceding his case against the PRC before the UN Human Rights Commission, which would render that also a farce.

It's like a bad novel which never ends.

0 comments
 

The "Real Scandal"


Good morning. Tired of the Blame-Bush mentality which has the opposition -- both media-frenzied and political -- a New York Post editorial points at the old UN Oil-for-Food program for Saddam:
And the U.S. General Accounting Office has estimated that Saddam skimmed as much as $10 billion from the $47 billion program.

It is not yet clear how much U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan knew about the shameful goings-on, including the extent to which program administrators collaborated with the Saddam regime and conspired in the defrauding of Iraqi Ku.
Oil-for-food, suggests a Senator, was a probable cause of the Franco-Russo-German dissent:
Note that France and Russia were the biggest recipients of Oil-for-Food largesse. As Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) pointed out last week, "The corruption . . . almost certainly contributed to the international division over containing and ultimately ousting Saddam Hussein."
Saddam had to pay extra for his weapons and their programs. France, Russia, and Germany sought to protect their extra incomes.

It's worth a thought, anyway.

0 comments

4/11/2004

 

There they go again.


To the media, it passes for a conventional wisdom truism, to be repeated matter-of-factly and knowingly: "The Right can't win elections." Many timid GOP party insiders mumble the same thing, as they push for the moderate they believe can win the general election.

They have forgotten the lessons of 1976 and 1980. In 1976, the media and GOP established deemed former California Governor Ronald Reagan to be something of a freakish, right wing anomaly, certain to get his clock cleaned that November. They nomination was handed to Vice President Gerald Ford, and it all fell to bits.

In 1980, Reagan won the nomination anyway and shocked the world that November.

From the Washington Whispers column in the April 10 US News & World Report comes this:
Senate Democrats are salivating over what they see as the self-inflicted wounds being sustained in the Pennsylvania GOP Senate primary (story, Page 33). They believe their unchallenged candidate, Rep. Joe Hoeffel, will face either a damaged incumbent Arlen Specter or an unyielding conservative in his challenger, Pat Toomey. "We look at this as one of the most competitive races in the country," says New Jersey Sen. Jon Corzine. The Dems' Senate campaign committee chair thinks Specter is bruising himself by moving too far right, but Specter says, "It's too early to focus on Hoeffel."
Corzine's just running his flap, and such talk is part of his job as DSCC chair.

The Commonwealth Republican Party establishment, however, is backing Specter. The National establishment, with the White House in the lead and conservative Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum following close behind, is backing Specter as the only sure thing against Hoeffel.

Joe Hoeffel is a clod. He's less exciting a candidate than is Specter, while Toomey is an excitement-generating campaigner.

In the same issue of the magazine, another article asks perhaps a better question than: Who can beat Hoeffel?
It is a battle with implications beyond the simple calculus of his own race; indeed, the Keystone State primary has become a proxy fight over whether there is still a role for moderates in the increasingly conservative GOP.
There is always room for moderates in the GOP as long as not all States will elect conservatives and the GOP wants its majorities, and this race will not answer any such question.

The race for the nomination is Specter's to lose, and he's leading in all the polls. For Toomey to win the primary, it would take a revolution. However, one should never bet against a revolution when the candidate seems capable of leading one.

0 comments
 

A Quote from Fallujah


While Bobby Byrd, Teddy Kennedy, and Tom Harkin pontificate politics predicated on quagmires of another Vietnam, etc., and while we wait for candidate John F. Kerry to think of something relevant to say, our Marines in Fallujah are doing their thing, which is an exquisite thaang most of us could never do.

From the TIME Magazine article linked above, sprinkled with pock marks of angst, I found a reassuring quote from Marine Corporal Mike Baccellieri, 23, from Portland, Oregon:
"This big fight had to happen at some point," said Baccellieri, 23, from Portland, Ore., as he leaned against a wall of the house during a lull in the fighting. "Let's get it over with, so we can start rebuilding the place and get out of here."
They knew it was coming. For all the shock, horror, and outrage coming from the floor of the Senate and the various and sundry editorial shacks around this country, a 23-year-old corporal has in eye on the proper prize. I'm glad he's over there for us, not a lad with the mind of a Michael Moore or the brain of Byrd.

0 comments
 

McCarrick and Sanctions


Forty-four years ago, John F. Kennedy had to prove that he could be both Catholic and an American; today, John F. Kerry has to prove that he can be a Catholic.

Here's this from Chris Wallace's interview with Washington's Arch-bishop John Cardinal McCarrick on Fox News Sunday this morning:
WALLACE: Should a Catholic politician follow the teachings of the church?

MCCARRICK: Well, as a Catholic, he certainly should follow the teachings of the church. The teachings of the church sometimes give the impression that they don't come from God. We believe that what we [the Catholic Church] proclaim is what the Gospel proclaims.

WALLACE: Some church officials are critical of Senator Kerry because of his stands on abortion and stem cell research. Is that fair?

MCCARRICK: It's fair that some bishops are critical of him, because each bishop makes his own decision. Certainly, I think we all would be critical of anyone who did not agree with us.

WALLACE: Which puts Kerry and his church on a possible collision course. Some Catholic leaders have suggested denying communion to politicians who don't obey their church.

At least one archbishop has said that he would not like to see Senator Kerry take communion there in St. Louis. How do you feel about that?

MCCARRICK: I think every archbishop has the right to make his decision in his own area.

I think that there are many of us who would feel that there are certain restrictions that's we might put on people, that there are certain sanctions that we may put on people. But I think many of us would not like to use the Eucharist as part of the sanction.

WALLACE: Would you, if Senator Kerry were at mass that you were...

MCCARRICK: I think I would want to get to talk to him, get to see him and get to understand him before I would make a decision like that.

If a man said to me, "I don't believe in Jesus Christ, I don't believe in the church, I don't believe in holy communion," and then comes up to me, I wouldn't give him communion.

WALLACE: But what if he said, "I disagree with the church's position on abortion and stem cell research"?

MCCARRICK: Well, I'd have to know exactly what his disagreement is all about.

WALLACE: So you're saying it's an issue?

MCCARRICK: Oh, I'm saying it's an issue, yes. These things [are important] because this is the teaching of the church. So it has to be an issue.
The Cardinal told Wallace: " We believe that what we [the Catholic Church] proclaim is what the Gospel proclaims." That is an important part of Catholicism: Catholics hold that Church teaching comes from God. Likewise, the Church would not pronounce something unless, according to Catholicism, it came from God.

Cardinal McCarrick says that he would prefer not to use something as holy to the church as the Eucharist as a sanction, or a punishment for variance with the church's teachings. It seems he's avoiding politics, though abortion and embryonic experimentation are not political matters to the church.

Either way, Kerry played it smart. He avoided attending a large Cathedral, opting instead to attend his neighborhood place in by an American-founded Catholic order which tends to allow more leeway.

I wonder if they noted that Kerry had taken communion in a Protestant church last week, which does not involved the transubstantiation Catholics see and is violative of Catholic Church rules.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ADDENDUM:

Katherine Q. Seelye of the NYTimes referred to Kerry's Catholic grotto, at which he had his communion this morning, as "a kind of New Age church that describes itself as "a worship community of Christians in the Roman Catholic tradition" and that attracts people drawn to its dedication to 'family religious education and social justice.'" That's his Paulist Center.
Archbishop Sean O'Malley of Boston has not explicitly said that Mr. Kerry may not receive communion, but he has suggested that Catholic politicians whose political views contradict Catholic teaching should voluntarily abstain, saying they "shouldn't dare come to communion."

There were no protesters at today's services, and it was not clear whether Mr. Kerry's receiving communion would bring a response from the church or affect his campaign as he seeks to become only the second Roman Catholic president of the United States, after John F. Kennedy.
New age Roman Catholicism? Somehow, that does not pass the smell test. Neither does Kerry.
0 comments
 

Commended to your attention


Jay Heller, a Arizonan who played his political role, writes an interesting Op/Ed today for the Arizona Republic. His thesis is that Arizona probably won't matter when it comes time to determine a winner